Elhawaz Alaa, Archer Gareth T, Zafar Hamza, Fidock Benjamin, Barker Natasha, Jones Rachel, Rothman Alexander, Hose Rod, Al-Mohammad Abdallah, Briffa Norman, Hunter Steven, Braidley Peter, Hall Ian R, Grech Ever, van der Geest Rob J, Gunn Julian P, Swift Andrew J, Wild James M, Garg Pankaj
Department of Infection, Immunity & Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021 Apr;11(4):1470-1482. doi: 10.21037/qims-20-586.
Left ventricular (LV) kinetic energy (KE) assessment by four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (4D flow CMR) may offer incremental value over routine assessment in aortic stenosis (AS). The main objective of this study is to investigate the LV KE in patients with AS before and after the valve intervention. In addition, this study aimed to investigate if LV KE offers incremental value for its association to the six-minute walk test (6MWT) or LV remodelling post-intervention.
We recruited 18 patients with severe AS. All patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography for mean pressure gradient (mPG), CMR including 4D flow and 6MWT. Patients were invited for post-valve intervention follow-up CMR at 3 months and twelve patients returned for follow-up CMR. KE assessment of LV blood flow and the components (direct, delayed, retained and residual) were carried out for all cases. LV KE parameters were normalised to LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV).
For LV blood flow KE assessment, the metrics including time delay (TD) for peak E-wave from base to mid-ventricle (14±48 2.5±9.75 ms, P=0.04), direct (4.91±5.07 1.86±1.72 µJ, P=0.01) and delayed (2.46±3.13 1.38±1.15 µJ, P=0.03) components of LV blood flow demonstrated a significant change between pre- and post-valve intervention. Only LV KEi (r=-0.53, P<0.01), diastolic KEi (r=-0.53, P<0.01) and E KEi (r=-0.38, P=0.04) demonstrated association to the 6MWT. However, Pre-operative LV KEi (r=0.67, P=0.02) demonstrated association to LV remodelling post valve intervention.
LV blood flow KE is associated with 6MWT and LV remodelling in patients with AS. LV KE assessment provides incremental value over routine LV function and pressure gradient (PG) assessment in AS.
通过四维血流心血管磁共振成像(4D 流 CMR)评估左心室(LV)动能(KE),相对于主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)的常规评估可能具有额外价值。本研究的主要目的是调查 AS 患者瓣膜干预前后的左心室 KE。此外,本研究旨在调查左心室 KE 是否因其与六分钟步行试验(6MWT)的关联或干预后左心室重构而具有额外价值。
我们招募了 18 例重度 AS 患者。所有患者均接受经胸超声心动图检查以测量平均压力阶差(mPG)、包括 4D 流的 CMR 检查以及 6MWT。邀请患者在 3 个月时进行瓣膜干预后的随访 CMR,12 例患者返回进行随访 CMR。对所有病例进行左心室血流的 KE 评估及其各成分(直接、延迟、保留和残余)评估。左心室 KE 参数以左心室舒张末期容积(LVEDV)进行标准化。
对于左心室血流 KE 评估,包括从心底到心室中部 E 波峰值的时间延迟(TD)(14±48 对 2.5±9.75 毫秒,P = 0.04)、左心室血流的直接成分(4.91±5.07 对 1.86±1.72 微焦耳,P = 0.01)和延迟成分(2.46±3.13 对 1.38±1.15 微焦耳,P = 0.03)等指标在瓣膜干预前后有显著变化。只有左心室 KEi(r = -0.53,P < 0.01)、舒张期 KEi(r = -0.53,P < 0.01)和 E KEi(r = -0.38,P = 0.04)与 6MWT 相关。然而,术前左心室 KEi(r = 0.67,P = 0.02)与瓣膜干预后的左心室重构相关。
AS 患者的左心室血流 KE 与 6MWT 和左心室重构相关。在 AS 中,左心室 KE 评估相对于常规左心室功能和压力阶差(PG)评估具有额外价值。