Suppr超能文献

用于认知功能受损但未患痴呆症患者的神经辅助II号(MLC901)(NEURITES):一项双盲、安慰剂对照的随机试验。

NEURoaid II (MLC901) in cognitively Impaired not demenTEd patientS (NEURITES): A pilot double blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial.

作者信息

Chen Christopher L H, Nguyen Trọng Hung, Marasigan Simeon, Lee Chun Fan, Lu Qingshu, Kandiah Nagaendran, de Silva Deidre, Chong Eddie, Venketasubramanian Narayanaswamy

机构信息

Memory and Aging Center Departments of Pharmacology and Psychological Medicine National University of Singapore Singapore.

Neurology National Geriatric Hospital Hanoi Vietnam.

出版信息

Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2021 Mar 31;7(1):e12161. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12161. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of MLC901 in vascular cognitive impairment no dementia (VCIND) patients.

DESIGN

This was a multi-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANT

VCIND patients from hospitals in Singapore (67), Vietnam (19), and the Philippines (17) were recruited and followed-up from March 2013 to April 2018.

METHODS

The primary outcome was executive function as measured by the Verbal Fluency (VF) and 2-part Color Trails Test (CTT). The mean difference in the scores between baseline and week 12, and baseline and week 24, was compared between MLC901 and placebo using a two-sample t-test.

RESULTS

The trial randomized 103 subjects: MLC901 (n = 57) and placebo (n = 46). The mean age of participants was 68.3 ± 8.4 years and 38.8% were female. Improvement in executive function with MLC901 was not significantly better than placebo at week 12 (CTT1 mean difference [md] 3.8 seconds, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -9.0 to 16.5, CTT2 md 10.9 seconds, 95% CI: -0.2 to 22.0), and at week 24 (CTT1 md 2.8 seconds, 95% CI: -8.4 to 14.0, CTT2 md = 4.4 seconds, 95% CI: -8.2 to 16.9). Improvement in VF from baseline was not significantly different between MLC901 and placebo at weeks 12 and 24. There were no significant differences in adverse events (43.5% vs. 56.1%) or serious adverse events (13% vs. 22.8%) in placebo versus MLC901 groups. In post hoc exploratory analysis, the treatment effect of MLC901 on cognitive function appears more apparent in subjects with existing impairment in executive function: CTT2 (md 14.4 seconds [ = .05] and 9.9 seconds [ = .3] at week 12 and week 24, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Whilst MLC901 appears to be safe, there was no significant cognitive benefit from MLC901 in the study population. Post hoc hypotheses generating analyses suggest that VCIND patients with existing impairment in executive function may show benefit.

摘要

目的

探讨MLC901治疗非痴呆型血管性认知障碍(VCIND)患者的疗效和安全性。

设计

这是一项多中心、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照的试点研究。

地点和参与者

招募了来自新加坡(67例)、越南(19例)和菲律宾(17例)医院的VCIND患者,并于2013年3月至2018年4月进行随访。

方法

主要结局是通过言语流畅性(VF)和两部分色词测验(CTT)测量的执行功能。使用两样本t检验比较MLC901组和安慰剂组在基线与第12周以及基线与第24周之间得分的平均差异。

结果

该试验将103名受试者随机分组:MLC901组(n = 57)和安慰剂组(n = 46)。参与者的平均年龄为68.3±8.4岁,女性占38.8%。在第12周时,MLC901组执行功能的改善并不显著优于安慰剂组(CTT1平均差异[md]为3.8秒,95%置信区间[CI]:-9.0至16.5;CTT²md为10.9秒,95%CI:-0.2至22.0),在第24周时也是如此(CTT1 md为2.8秒,95%CI:-8.4至14.0;CTT²md为4.4秒,95%CI:-8.2至16.9)。在第12周和第24周时,MLC901组和安慰剂组从基线开始的VF改善无显著差异。安慰剂组与MLC901组在不良事件(43.5%对56.1%)或严重不良事件(13%对22.8%)方面无显著差异。在事后探索性分析中,MLC901对认知功能的治疗效果在已有执行功能损害的受试者中似乎更明显:CTT²在第12周和第24周时的平均差异分别为14.4秒(P = .05)和9.9秒(P = .3)。

结论

虽然MLC901似乎是安全的,但在研究人群中MLC901未显示出显著的认知益处。事后假设生成分析表明,已有执行功能损害的VCIND患者可能会从中受益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f56/8010368/4200fc3e9273/TRC2-7-e12161-g003.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验