• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保护性农业对土壤生物多样性有微小影响,这种影响在生物界和地理位置之间存在差异。

A small effect of conservation agriculture on soil biodiversity that differs between biological kingdoms and geographic locations.

作者信息

Giraldo-Perez Paulina, Raw Victoria, Greven Marc, Goddard Matthew R

机构信息

The School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.

The New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited - Rangahau Ahumāra Kai, PO Box 845, Blenheim, New Zealand.

出版信息

iScience. 2021 Mar 8;24(4):102280. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102280. eCollection 2021 Apr 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.isci.2021.102280
PMID:33817583
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8008184/
Abstract

Larger easily visible animals and plants are negatively affected by agrochemicals used for intensive food production, but we do not understand the general spatial and temporal effects of agrochemicals on the multitudes of bacteria, fungi, and small invertebrate animals that underpin ecosystem productivity. We sequenced the 16S, ITS2, and COI DNA barcode regions from 648 New Zealand vineyard soil samples managed under either conventional or low-agrochemical-input conservation approaches across two regions and three seasons in 1 year and discovered at least 170,000 phylotypes (taxa) with >97% genetic identity. Management approach correlated with a significant 2%-10% difference in the abundances of phylotypes that differed over regions and seasons. Although the data show that agrochemicals do not have a large effect on soil biodiversity on average, the important finding is that the magnitude of impact differs between taxa types and locations, and some taxa most affected also influence the quality of agricultural produce.

摘要

体型较大、易于观察的动植物会受到用于集约化粮食生产的农用化学品的负面影响,但我们并不了解农用化学品对构成生态系统生产力基础的大量细菌、真菌和小型无脊椎动物的总体时空影响。我们对来自新西兰两个地区、在1年中的三个季节采用常规或低农用化学品投入保护方法管理的648个葡萄园土壤样本的16S、ITS2和COI DNA条形码区域进行了测序,发现了至少170,000个遗传同一性>97%的系统发育型(分类单元)。管理方法与不同地区和季节中丰度存在显著2%-10%差异的系统发育型相关。虽然数据表明农用化学品平均而言对土壤生物多样性影响不大,但重要的发现是,影响程度在分类单元类型和地点之间存在差异,一些受影响最严重的分类单元也会影响农产品质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cef2/8008184/ad0c1a0eca07/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cef2/8008184/052e8759694a/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cef2/8008184/a23c04204430/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cef2/8008184/34cca03244c7/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cef2/8008184/39d8a538ec03/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cef2/8008184/ad0c1a0eca07/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cef2/8008184/052e8759694a/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cef2/8008184/a23c04204430/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cef2/8008184/34cca03244c7/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cef2/8008184/39d8a538ec03/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cef2/8008184/ad0c1a0eca07/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
A small effect of conservation agriculture on soil biodiversity that differs between biological kingdoms and geographic locations.保护性农业对土壤生物多样性有微小影响,这种影响在生物界和地理位置之间存在差异。
iScience. 2021 Mar 8;24(4):102280. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102280. eCollection 2021 Apr 23.
2
Land use as a driver of soil fertility and biodiversity across an agricultural landscape in the Central Peruvian Andes.土地利用对秘鲁安第斯山脉中部农业景观土壤肥力和生物多样性的影响。
Ecol Appl. 2017 Jun;27(4):1138-1154. doi: 10.1002/eap.1508. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
3
Intensive agriculture reduces soil biodiversity across Europe.集约化农业降低了整个欧洲的土壤生物多样性。
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Feb;21(2):973-85. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12752. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
4
Impact of Cropping Systems, Soil Inoculum, and Plant Species Identity on Soil Bacterial Community Structure.种植制度、土壤接种物和植物物种身份对土壤细菌群落结构的影响。
Microb Ecol. 2017 Feb;73(2):417-434. doi: 10.1007/s00248-016-0861-2. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
5
Agricultural intensification exacerbates spillover effects on soil biogeochemistry in adjacent forest remnants.农业集约化加剧了对相邻森林残余地土壤生物地球化学的溢出效应。
PLoS One. 2015 Jan 9;10(1):e0116474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116474. eCollection 2015.
6
Long-term organic-inorganic fertilization ensures great soil productivity and bacterial diversity after natural-to-agricultural ecosystem conversion.长期有机无机施肥可确保自然生态系统向农业生态系统转化后土壤具有较高的生产力和细菌多样性。
J Microbiol. 2016 Sep;54(9):611-617. doi: 10.1007/s12275-016-6143-3. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
7
Effect of crop management and sample year on abundance of soil bacterial communities in organic and conventional cropping systems.作物管理和采样年份对有机和传统种植系统中土壤细菌群落丰度的影响。
J Appl Microbiol. 2015 Jul;119(1):208-14. doi: 10.1111/jam.12822. Epub 2015 May 19.
8
Reconciling food production and biodiversity conservation: land sharing and land sparing compared.协调粮食生产与生物多样性保护:土地共享与土地分离的比较。
Science. 2011 Sep 2;333(6047):1289-91. doi: 10.1126/science.1208742.
9
Soil biota community structure and abundance under agricultural intensification and extensification.农业集约化和外延化下的土壤生物群落结构和丰度。
Ecology. 2010 Feb;91(2):460-73. doi: 10.1890/09-0666.1.
10
Dryland Organic Farming Partially Offsets Negative Effects of Highly Simplified Agricultural Landscapes on Forbs, Bees, and Bee-Flower Networks.旱地有机农业部分抵消了高度简化的农业景观对草本植物、蜜蜂和蜜蜂-花卉网络的负面影响。
Environ Entomol. 2019 Aug 5;48(4):826-835. doi: 10.1093/ee/nvz056.

引用本文的文献

1
The relative abundances of yeasts attractive to Drosophila suzukii differ between fruit types and are greatest on raspberries.对果蝇有吸引力的酵母的相对丰度因果实类型而异,在覆盆子上最高。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 20;12(1):10382. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14275-x.
2
Sources and Assembly of Microbial Communities in Vineyards as a Functional Component of Winegrowing.葡萄园微生物群落的来源与组装作为酿酒业的一个功能组成部分
Front Microbiol. 2021 Apr 13;12:673810. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.673810. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Blind spots in global soil biodiversity and ecosystem function research.全球土壤生物多样性和生态系统功能研究中的盲点。
Nat Commun. 2020 Aug 3;11(1):3870. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17688-2.
2
Trophic magnification of legacy persistent organic pollutants in an urban terrestrial food web.城市陆地食物网中遗留持久性有机污染物的营养级放大。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Apr 20;714:136746. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136746. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
3
Conventional and organic soil management as divergent drivers of resident and active fractions of major soil food web constituents.
传统和有机土壤管理作为主要土壤食物网成分的居民和活性部分的不同驱动因素。
Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 18;9(1):13521. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49854-y.
4
Genome evolution across 1,011 Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates.在 1011 个酿酒酵母分离株中进行基因组进化研究。
Nature. 2018 Apr;556(7701):339-344. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0030-5. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
5
Agrobiodiversity and a sustainable food future.农业生物多样性与可持续的粮食未来。
Nat Plants. 2017 Apr 6;3(4):17047. doi: 10.1038/nplants.2017.47.
6
Evaluating a multigene environmental DNA approach for biodiversity assessment.评估一种用于生物多样性评估的多基因环境DNA方法。
Gigascience. 2015 Oct 6;4:46. doi: 10.1186/s13742-015-0086-1. eCollection 2015.
7
Regional microbial signatures positively correlate with differential wine phenotypes: evidence for a microbial aspect to terroir.区域微生物特征与葡萄酒的不同表型呈正相关:风土微生物层面的证据。
Sci Rep. 2015 Sep 24;5:14233. doi: 10.1038/srep14233.
8
Quantifying the relative roles of selective and neutral processes in defining eukaryotic microbial communities.量化选择性过程和中性过程在定义真核微生物群落中的相对作用。
ISME J. 2015 Sep;9(9):2003-11. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.18. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
9
Distinct soil microbial diversity under long-term organic and conventional farming.长期有机耕作和传统耕作下不同的土壤微生物多样性
ISME J. 2015 May;9(5):1177-94. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.210. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
10
Biodiversity conservation in agriculture requires a multi-scale approach.农业中的生物多样性保护需要采取多尺度方法。
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Sep 22;281(1791):20141358. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1358.