Department of Social and Political Science, Bocconi University, Via Roentgen 1, 20136 Milan (Italy); Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), SDA Bocconi School of Management, Via Sarfatti 10, 20136 Milan (Italy).
Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), SDA Bocconi School of Management, Via Sarfatti 10, 20136 Milan (Italy).
Health Policy. 2021 May;125(5):602-608. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.03.003. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
Differing contexts have greatly influenced HTA development in various countries, with considerable effort recently made by international HTA networks (e.g., EUnetHTA) and the European Union (EU) to make HTA a more coherent, equal, and efficient process. Medical devices (MDs) present particular challenges for HTA because of frequent, rapid innovation, outcomes influenced by end-user competence, dynamic pricing and often low-quality scientific evidence. Our objective is to describe the development, structure and governance of a National HTA Program for MDs (PNHTADM) in Italy, a highly participatory, stakeholder-engaged, evidence-based process to reform a fragmented system of appraisal and approval. Based largely on EUnetHTA methods, the resulting process delineates a standardized system for proposing MDs by any stakeholders, accrediting HTA producers, setting criteria for prioritization and appraisals, and innovatively linking recommendations with coverage, reimbursement and procurement of MDs. Expected benefits include reduced disparities in pricing and reimbursement policies and improved access to new technologies across 21 regional healthcare systems in Italy's decentralized, universal system, complete with provisions to require additional evidence collection and centrally monitor diffusion. Though devised for Italy, the design, resources and underlying analysis provide a framework for other nations seeking to consolidate HTA initiatives, particularly in light of new EU regulation.
不同的背景极大地影响了各国的卫生技术评估发展,国际卫生技术评估网络(如 EUnetHTA)和欧盟最近做出了相当大的努力,以使卫生技术评估更加连贯、平等和高效。医疗器械(MDs)因其频繁、快速的创新、受最终用户能力影响的结果、动态定价以及通常低质量的科学证据,给卫生技术评估带来了特殊挑战。我们的目标是描述意大利医疗器械国家卫生技术评估计划(PNHTADM)的发展、结构和治理,这是一个高度参与、利益相关者参与、基于证据的过程,旨在改革评估和批准的零碎系统。该过程主要基于 EUnetHTA 方法,为任何利益相关者提出医疗器械制定了一个标准化的系统,认可卫生技术评估者,为优先级和评估制定标准,并创新性地将建议与医疗器械的覆盖范围、报销和采购联系起来。预期的好处包括减少定价和报销政策的差距,以及改善意大利分散化、普及性医疗体系中 21 个地区医疗保健系统对新技术的获取,同时还规定了需要收集更多证据和集中监测扩散的条款。尽管该计划是为意大利设计的,但它的设计、资源和基础分析为其他寻求整合卫生技术评估计划的国家提供了一个框架,特别是考虑到新的欧盟法规。