• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚赌博风险曲线在频率、支出和收入比例方面的形态。

The shape of gambling risk-curves for frequency, expenditure and proportion of income in Australia.

机构信息

Centre for Social and Early Emotional Development, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.

Centre for Adolescent Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia.

出版信息

Addiction. 2021 Nov;116(11):3219-3226. doi: 10.1111/add.15507. Epub 2021 Apr 26.

DOI:10.1111/add.15507
PMID:33822435
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Examining risk-curves is important to understanding the degree to which indices of gambling consumption are associated with gambling-related harm. Risk-curves have largely been described as J-shaped, suggesting that at low levels of consumption harm remain constant but then increase sharply at a certain threshold. Alternative methods in recent work, however, have described risk-curves as linear and R-shaped, indicating that risk of harm increases as consumption increases at all levels of consumption. The aim of the current study is to estimate the shape of gambling risk-curves using competing methods.

DESIGN

Systematic comparison of gambling risk-curves using categorical (via plots) and continuous (via bootstrapped regression analyses) operationalizations of gambling consumption. Setting and participants Data were 2873 gamblers (1417 women) from the fourth Social and Economic Impact Study of Gambling in Tasmania.

MEASUREMENTS

Gambling-related harm was assessed using the Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) and Short Gambling Harm Screen (SGHS). Gambling consumption was assessed as annual frequency, expenditure and expenditure as a proportion of income.

FINDINGS

Categorical gambling consumption data plotted with equal magnitudes evidenced J-shaped risk-curves. When the magnitude of gambling categories was re-scaled to the mid-points, risk-curves no longer appeared J-shaped. Additionally, bootstrapped regression analyses using the continuous gambling consumption data did not provide evidence for J-shaped risk-curves.

CONCLUSIONS

Gambling risk-curves in Tasmania appear not to be J-shaped, but rather suggest that risk of gambling-related harm increases with even small increases in gambling consumption.

摘要

背景与目的

研究风险曲线对于理解赌博消费指标与赌博相关危害之间的关联程度至关重要。风险曲线在很大程度上被描述为 J 形,表明在低消费水平下,危害保持不变,但在一定阈值后急剧增加。然而,最近的研究中采用的替代方法将风险曲线描述为线性和 R 形,表明在所有消费水平下,随着消费的增加,危害的风险也随之增加。本研究的目的是使用竞争方法来估计赌博风险曲线的形状。

设计

使用赌博消费的分类(通过图)和连续(通过自举回归分析)操作化来系统比较赌博风险曲线。

设置和参与者

数据来自塔斯马尼亚第四次赌博社会经济影响研究的 2873 名赌徒(1417 名女性)。

测量

使用赌博问题严重程度指数(PGSI)和短期赌博危害量表(SGHS)评估赌博相关危害。赌博消费评估为年度频率、支出和支出占收入的比例。

发现

以相等幅度绘制的分类赌博消费数据呈现 J 形风险曲线。当赌博类别幅度重新调整为中点时,风险曲线不再呈现 J 形。此外,使用连续赌博消费数据的自举回归分析并未提供 J 形风险曲线的证据。

结论

塔斯马尼亚的赌博风险曲线似乎不是 J 形,而是表明随着赌博消费的微小增加,赌博相关危害的风险也会增加。

相似文献

1
The shape of gambling risk-curves for frequency, expenditure and proportion of income in Australia.澳大利亚赌博风险曲线在频率、支出和收入比例方面的形态。
Addiction. 2021 Nov;116(11):3219-3226. doi: 10.1111/add.15507. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
2
The relationship between player losses and gambling-related harm: evidence from nationally representative cross-sectional surveys in four countries.玩家损失与赌博相关危害之间的关系:来自四个国家具有全国代表性的横断面调查的证据。
Addiction. 2016 Feb;111(2):320-30. doi: 10.1111/add.13178. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
3
The identification of Australian low-risk gambling limits: A comparison of gambling-related harm measures.澳大利亚低风险赌博限制的确定:赌博相关危害措施的比较。
J Behav Addict. 2021 Mar 31;10(1):21-34. doi: 10.1556/2006.2021.00012.
4
Gambling Participation, Expenditure and Risk of Harm in Australia, 1997-1998 and 2010-2011.澳大利亚 1997-1998 年和 2010-2011 年的赌博参与度、支出和危害风险。
J Gambl Stud. 2018 Mar;34(1):255-274. doi: 10.1007/s10899-017-9708-0.
5
Benchmarking gambling screens to health-state utility: the PGSI and the SGHS estimate similar levels of population gambling-harm.对赌博筛查工具进行效标比较:PGSI 和 SGHS 估计的人群赌博危害水平相近。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 27;22(1):839. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13243-4.
6
Gambling consumption and harm: a systematic review of the evidence.赌博消费与危害:证据的系统综述
Addict Res Theory. 2023 Aug 2;32(3):194-203. doi: 10.1080/16066359.2023.2238608. eCollection 2024.
7
Consumer Perspectives on Gambling Harm Minimisation Measures in an Australian Jurisdiction.澳大利亚某司法辖区内消费者对赌博危害最小化措施的看法。
J Gambl Stud. 2016 Jun;32(2):801-22. doi: 10.1007/s10899-015-9568-4.
8
Validating the short gambling harm screen against external benchmarks.验证短时间赌博危害筛查对外部基准的有效性。
J Behav Addict. 2022 Oct 12;11(4):994-1001. doi: 10.1556/2006.2022.00075. Print 2022 Dec 27.
9
Risk of harm among gamblers in the general population as a function of level of participation in gambling activities.一般人群中赌徒的伤害风险与参与赌博活动的程度的函数关系。
Addiction. 2006 Apr;101(4):570-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01392.x.
10
The Identification of Low-risk Gambling Limits for Specific Gambling Activities.特定赌博活动的低风险赌博限制的确定。
J Gambl Stud. 2022 Jun;38(2):559-590. doi: 10.1007/s10899-021-10036-z. Epub 2021 Jun 1.

引用本文的文献

1
What is the impact of sports-related gambling advertising on gambling behaviour? A systematic review.与体育相关的赌博广告对赌博行为有何影响?一项系统综述。
Addiction. 2025 Apr;120(4):589-607. doi: 10.1111/add.16761. Epub 2025 Jan 11.
2
Gambling consumption and harm: a systematic review of the evidence.赌博消费与危害:证据的系统综述
Addict Res Theory. 2023 Aug 2;32(3):194-203. doi: 10.1080/16066359.2023.2238608. eCollection 2024.
3
Exploring the relationships between psychological variables and loot box engagement, part 1: pre-registered hypotheses.
探索心理变量与开箱玩法参与度之间的关系,第1部分:预先注册的假设。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Dec 20;10(12):231045. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231045. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
One size does not fit all. Should gambling loss limits be based on income?一刀切并不适用于所有情况。赌博损失限制应该基于收入吗?
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 16;13:1005172. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1005172. eCollection 2022.