Xu Zhen-Zhen, Li Xue, Zhang Zhen, Liu Zheng-Ye, Song Lin-Lin, Li Xue-Ying, Zhang Hong
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8, Xishiku Street, Beijing, 100034, China.
Department of Anesthesiology, Civil Aviation General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Trials. 2021 Apr 6;22(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05173-0.
Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel inter-fascial plane block, which is applied more and more in postoperative pain control, especially in chest surgery. Regional block is advocated in order to decrease opioid consumption and improve analgesia in urological surgery. Therefore, we aimed to explore whether ESPB would have similar analgesia compared with thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) in laparoscopic nephroureterectomy.
This prospective, randomized, double-blinded, non-inferiority trial will enroll 166 patients undergoing laparoscopic nephroureterectomy. Participants will be randomly assigned 1:1 into receiving ESPB or TPVB before surgery. Both ultrasound-guided ESPB and TPVB will be performed with an injection of 0.375% ropivacaine 0.4 ml/kg before anesthesia induction. Standardized patients controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) will be applied for each patient. The primary endpoint is the joint of cumulative 24 h opioid (sufentanil) consumption and average pain score via numeric rating scale (NRS) at 24 h after surgery. Secondary endpoints include rescued analgesic demand, cumulative opioid consumption, and pain NRS scores at different preset timepoints within 48 h after surgery. Other predefined outcomes include clinical features of blockage, quality of recovery, subjective sleep quality, time to ambulation and diet, and adverse events, as well as length of stay in hospital and anesthesia cost.
Previous studies investigating the analgesic efficacy of ESPB only concentrated on a single endpoint for postoperative pain evaluation, while studies focusing on the direct comparison between ESPB and TPVB in urological surgery are still lacking. Our study is the first trial in non-inferiority design of comparing ESPB and TPVB in patient undergoing laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and the primary outcome is the joint endpoint of opioid consumption and pain NRS score.
Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR 2000031916 . Registered on 14 April 2020.
竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)是一种新型的筋膜间平面阻滞技术,在术后疼痛控制中应用越来越广泛,尤其是在胸科手术中。为减少泌尿外科手术中阿片类药物的使用并改善镇痛效果,提倡采用区域阻滞。因此,我们旨在探讨在腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术中,ESPB与胸椎旁神经阻滞(TPVB)相比是否具有相似的镇痛效果。
这项前瞻性、随机、双盲、非劣效性试验将纳入166例行腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术的患者。参与者将在手术前按1:1随机分配接受ESPB或TPVB。在麻醉诱导前,超声引导下的ESPB和TPVB均注射0.375%罗哌卡因0.4 ml/kg。每位患者将接受标准化的患者自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)。主要终点是术后24小时阿片类药物(舒芬太尼)的累积消耗量与平均疼痛评分(通过数字评分量表(NRS))的联合指标。次要终点包括补救性镇痛需求、阿片类药物累积消耗量以及术后48小时内不同预设时间点的疼痛NRS评分。其他预先定义的结果包括阻滞的临床特征、恢复质量、主观睡眠质量、下床活动和进食时间、不良事件,以及住院时间和麻醉费用。
以往关于ESPB镇痛效果的研究仅集中于术后疼痛评估的单一终点,而缺乏针对泌尿外科手术中ESPB与TPVB直接比较的研究。我们的研究是第一项在腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术中比较ESPB和TPVB的非劣效性设计试验,主要结局是阿片类药物消耗量和疼痛NRS评分的联合终点。
中国临床试验注册中心ChiCTR 2000031916。于2020年4月14日注册。