Cho Jae-Woo, Cho Won-Tae, Sakong Seungyeob, Lim Eic Ju, Choi Wonseok, Kang Seonghyun, Kim Beom-Soo, Kim Jin-Kak, Oh Chang-Wug, Oh Jong-Keon
Guro Hospital, Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Injury. 2021 Jun;52(6):1403-1409. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.03.054. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
The aim of this study was to analyze and describe the fracture patterns of the acetabular posterior wall based on quantitative measurements of the fracture characteristics.
Computed tomography images of 51 patients with acetabular posterior wall fractures from an initial cohort of 216 acetabular fractures were imported into a three-dimensional (3D) virtual software. The reconstructed 3D images were utilized to evaluate the following: (i) fracture line mapping on the inner articular and retro-acetabular surfaces, (ii) common zones of fracture and marginal impaction, and (iii) categorization by location and pattern of comminution. The clock-face position was applied for description: the midpoint of the transverse acetabular ligament served as the +180° reference point, and the 0° reference point was set perpendicular to the ligament. The fracture angle on the articular surface was defined as the intersection between the start and end points. The fracture span on the retro-acetabular surface was defined as the ratio of the perpendicular distance, which is between the fracture beak and acetabular rim, to the entire length, which is from the edge to the rim. Quantitative measurements were performed, and the fracture patterns were analyzed. A color scale bar was used to visualize the common and marginal impaction zones.
The articular surface mapping of all the cases demonstrated that the average starting point of the fracture line was +6.2° (±12.8°) and the endpoint was 96.7° (±13.3°), and the average fracture angle was 119.6° (±7.6°) with 80.6% of the fragments having angles within 18.7-117°. The retro-acetabular surface mapping demonstrated that the average fracture span was 0.65 ±0.20, and 61.7 % of the fracture lines were located within 0.6 to 0.9. Marginal impaction was found in 21 cases (21/51, 41.2%; range: between +7° and +105°).
The fracture maps showed fracture patterns and recurrent fracture zones on the articular and retro-acetabular surfaces. However, there was no remarkable pattern of marginal impaction.
Retrospective cohort study.
本研究旨在通过对髋臼后壁骨折特征进行定量测量,分析并描述其骨折类型。
从216例髋臼骨折的初始队列中选取51例髋臼后壁骨折患者的计算机断层扫描图像,导入三维(3D)虚拟软件。利用重建的3D图像评估以下内容:(i)关节内和髋臼后表面的骨折线测绘;(ii)骨折和边缘撞击的常见区域;(iii)按粉碎位置和类型进行分类。采用钟面定位法进行描述:髋臼横韧带中点作为+180°参考点,0°参考点垂直于该韧带设置。关节面上的骨折角定义为起点和终点之间的夹角。髋臼后表面的骨折跨度定义为骨折喙与髋臼边缘之间的垂直距离与从边缘到髋臼边缘的全长之比。进行定量测量并分析骨折类型。使用色标条直观显示常见和边缘撞击区域。
所有病例的关节面测绘显示,骨折线的平均起点为+6.2°(±12.8°),终点为96.7°(±13.3°),平均骨折角为119.6°(±7.6°),80.6%的骨折块角度在18.7 - 117°之间。髋臼后表面测绘显示,平均骨折跨度为0.65±0.20,61.7%的骨折线位于0.6至0.9之间。21例(21/51,41.2%)发现边缘撞击,范围在+7°至+105°之间。
骨折图谱显示了关节面和髋臼后表面的骨折类型及反复出现的骨折区域。然而,边缘撞击没有明显的模式。
回顾性队列研究。