• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一款旨在增强患者为更安全手术护理做出贡献能力的智能手机应用:使用焦点小组评估不同公众和患者的看法的定性评估。

A Smartphone App Designed to Empower Patients to Contribute Toward Safer Surgical Care: Qualitative Evaluation of Diverse Public and Patient Perceptions Using Focus Groups.

机构信息

Centre for Implementation Science, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Apr 8;9(4):e24065. doi: 10.2196/24065.

DOI:10.2196/24065
PMID:33830062
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8063097/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

MySurgery is a smartphone app designed to empower patients and their caregivers to contribute toward safer surgical care by following practical advice to help reduce susceptibility to errors and complications.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to evaluate service users' perceptions of MySurgery, including its perceived acceptability, the potential barriers and facilitators to accessing and using its content, and ideas about how to facilitate its effective implementation. The secondary aim is to analyze how the intended use of the app might differ for diverse patients, including seldom-heard groups.

METHODS

We implemented a diversity approach to recruit participants from a range of backgrounds with previous experience of surgery. We aimed to achieve representation from seldom-heard groups, including those from a Black, Asian, and minority ethnic (BAME) background; those with a disability; and those from the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer (LGBT+) community. A total of 3 focus groups were conducted across a 2-month period, during which a semistructured protocol was followed to elicit a rich discussion around the app. The focus groups were audio recorded, and thematic analysis was carried out.

RESULTS

In total, 22 individuals participated in the focus groups. A total of 50% (n=11) of the participants were from a BAME background, 59% (n=13) had a disability, and 36% (n=8) were from the LGBT+ community. There was a strong degree of support for the MySurgery app. The majority of participants agreed that it was acceptable and appropriate in terms of content and usability, and that it would help to educate patients about how to become involved in improving safety. The checklist-like format was popular. There was rich discussion around the accessibility and inclusivity of MySurgery. Specific user groups were identified who might face barriers in accessing the app or acting on its advice, such as those with visual impairments or learning difficulties and those who preferred to take a more passive role (eg, some individuals because of their cultural background or personality type). The app could be improved by signposting further specialty-specific information and incorporating a calendar and notes section. With regard to implementation, it was agreed that use of the app should be signposted before the preoperative appointment and that training and education should be provided for clinicians to increase awareness and buy-in. Communication about the app should clarify its scientific basis in plain English and should stress that its use is optional.

CONCLUSIONS

MySurgery was endorsed as a powerful tool for enhancing patient empowerment and facilitating the direct involvement of patients and their caregivers in maintaining patient safety. The diversity approach allowed for a better understanding of the needs of different population groups and highlighted opportunities for increasing accessibility and involvement in the app.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0876/8063097/92a8ad4456ee/mhealth_v9i4e24065_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0876/8063097/92a8ad4456ee/mhealth_v9i4e24065_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0876/8063097/92a8ad4456ee/mhealth_v9i4e24065_fig1.jpg
摘要

背景

MySurgery 是一款智能手机应用程序,旨在通过提供实用建议帮助患者及其护理人员减少易出错和易发生并发症的风险,从而增强患者及其护理人员在安全手术护理方面的能力。

目的

本研究旨在评估服务用户对 MySurgery 的看法,包括其感知的可接受性、获取和使用其内容的潜在障碍和促进因素,以及有关如何促进其有效实施的想法。次要目的是分析应用程序的预期用途可能因不同的患者而有所不同,包括很少被听到的群体。

方法

我们采用了多样性方法,从有手术经验的各种背景的参与者中招募参与者。我们旨在代表很少被听到的群体,包括来自黑人、亚洲和少数民族(BAME)背景的人;残疾人士;以及女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别、酷儿(LGBT+)群体的人。在两个月的时间里进行了 3 次焦点小组讨论,在此期间,遵循半结构化协议以围绕该应用程序进行深入讨论。焦点小组进行了音频录制,并进行了主题分析。

结果

共有 22 人参加了焦点小组。共有 50%(n=11)的参与者来自 BAME 背景,59%(n=13)有残疾,36%(n=8)来自 LGBT+社区。对 MySurgery 应用程序的支持度很高。大多数参与者认为该应用程序在内容和可用性方面是可以接受和合适的,并且它将有助于教育患者如何参与提高安全性。清单式格式很受欢迎。围绕 MySurgery 的可及性和包容性进行了丰富的讨论。确定了特定的用户群体,他们可能在获取应用程序或采取其建议方面面临障碍,例如视力障碍或学习困难的人,以及那些更喜欢采取更被动角色的人(例如,由于他们的文化背景或个性类型而有些人)。可以通过引导进一步的专业特定信息、纳入日历和注释部分来改进该应用程序。在实施方面,人们一致认为应该在术前预约之前引导使用该应用程序,并应该为临床医生提供培训和教育,以提高认识和认同。有关该应用程序的沟通应使用通俗易懂的英语阐明其科学依据,并应强调其使用是可选的。

结论

MySurgery 被认为是增强患者授权和促进患者及其护理人员直接参与维护患者安全的有力工具。多样性方法使我们能够更好地了解不同人群群体的需求,并突出了提高应用程序可及性和参与度的机会。

相似文献

1
A Smartphone App Designed to Empower Patients to Contribute Toward Safer Surgical Care: Qualitative Evaluation of Diverse Public and Patient Perceptions Using Focus Groups.一款旨在增强患者为更安全手术护理做出贡献能力的智能手机应用:使用焦点小组评估不同公众和患者的看法的定性评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Apr 8;9(4):e24065. doi: 10.2196/24065.
2
A Smartphone App Designed to Empower Patients to Contribute Toward Safer Surgical Care: Community-Based Evaluation Using a Participatory Approach.一款旨在增强患者为更安全手术护理做出贡献能力的智能手机应用:基于社区的参与式评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jan 20;8(1):e12859. doi: 10.2196/12859.
3
Development of a Smartphone App to Predict and Improve the Rates of Suicidal Ideation Among Transgender Persons (TransLife): Qualitative Study.开发一款智能手机应用程序,预测和改善跨性别者(TransLife)自杀意念的发生率:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 24;23(3):e24023. doi: 10.2196/24023.
4
Perceptions of the feasibility and acceptability of a smartphone application for the treatment of binge eating disorders: Qualitative feedback from a user population and clinicians.关于一款用于治疗暴饮暴食症的智能手机应用程序的可行性和可接受性的认知:来自用户群体和临床医生的定性反馈
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Oct;84(10):808-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.06.004. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
5
People affected by cancer and their carers from gender and sexually diverse communities: their experiences and the role of smartphone applications.癌症患者及其来自性别和性多样化社区的照顾者:他们的经历和智能手机应用程序的作用。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 20;24(1):1649. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19144-y.
6
The Acceptability, Engagement, and Feasibility of Mental Health Apps for Marginalized and Underserved Young People: Systematic Review and Qualitative Study.边缘化和服务不足的年轻人使用心理健康应用的可接受性、参与度和可行性:系统评价和定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 30;26:e48964. doi: 10.2196/48964.
7
Accessibility information in New Delhi for "EaseAccess" Android-based app for persons with disability: an observational study.针对残疾人士的基于安卓系统的“轻松访问”应用程序在新德里的可访问性信息:一项观察性研究。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019 Oct;14(7):645-662. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1471743. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
8
Exploring Individuals' Views and Feedback on a Nutritional Screening Mobile App: Qualitative Focus Group Study.探索个体对一款营养筛查移动应用程序的看法和反馈:定性焦点小组研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Dec 18;8:e63680. doi: 10.2196/63680.
9
Smartphone Apps to Support Falls Rehabilitation Exercise: App Development and Usability and Acceptability Study.智能手机应用程序支持跌倒康复锻炼:应用程序开发以及可用性和可接受性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Sep 28;8(9):e15460. doi: 10.2196/15460.
10
What Patients Want in a Smartphone App That Supports Colonoscopy Preparation: Qualitative Study to Inform a User-Centered Smartphone App.患者希望智能手机应用程序在结肠镜检查准备中提供什么:一项定性研究,为以用户为中心的智能手机应用程序提供信息。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jul 2;7(7):e12242. doi: 10.2196/12242.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of a Multispecialty Mobile Health App: Pilot Study.多专科移动健康应用程序的评估:试点研究
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2025 Jan 27;7(2):203-206. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.12.003. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Patient and family engagement interventions for enhancing patient safety in the perioperative journey: a scoping review.用于提高围手术期患者安全的患者及家属参与干预措施:一项范围综述
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Feb 17;14(1):e002986. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002986.
3
Mobility paradoxes: disruptors, benefits, and agency among mobile female sex workers living with HIV in the Dominican Republic and Tanzania.

本文引用的文献

1
Technology Use for Adolescent Health and Wellness.技术在青少年健康和保健中的应用。
Pediatrics. 2020 May;145(Suppl 2):S186-S194. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-2056G.
2
A Smartphone App Designed to Empower Patients to Contribute Toward Safer Surgical Care: Community-Based Evaluation Using a Participatory Approach.一款旨在增强患者为更安全手术护理做出贡献能力的智能手机应用:基于社区的参与式评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jan 20;8(1):e12859. doi: 10.2196/12859.
3
Patients' and healthcare workers' recommendations for a surgical patient safety checklist - a qualitative study.
流动性悖论:多米尼加共和国和坦桑尼亚感染艾滋病毒的流动女性性工作者中的破坏因素、益处及能动性
BMC Glob Public Health. 2024 Jan 16;2(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s44263-023-00032-3.
4
Association between patient activation and adherence to a colorectal enhanced recovery pathway: a prospective cohort study.患者激活与结直肠强化康复路径依从性之间的关联:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Dec;38(12):7577-7587. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11258-z. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
5
Behavioral sciences applied to acute care teams: a research agenda for the years ahead by a European research network.行为科学在急症护理团队中的应用:一个欧洲研究网络的未来研究议程。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 13;24(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10555-6.
6
Patients' experiences of using a mobile application-based rehabilitation programme after total hip or knee arthroplasty: a qualitative descriptive study.全髋关节或膝关节置换术后患者使用基于移动应用程序的康复计划的体验:一项定性描述性研究。
BMC Nurs. 2023 Jul 27;22(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01409-3.
7
Bariatric Patient Engagement in a Pre-surgery Virtual Patient Navigation Platform (VPNP).肥胖患者参与术前虚拟患者导航平台(VPNP)。
Obes Surg. 2023 Sep;33(9):2770-2779. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06558-7. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
8
How the smartphone apps can improve your sexual wellbeing.智能手机应用程序如何改善你的性健康。
Int J Impot Res. 2024 Nov;36(7):781-785. doi: 10.1038/s41443-023-00730-4. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
9
Feasibility of implementing a surgical patient safety checklist: prospective cross-sectional evaluation.实施手术患者安全检查表的可行性:前瞻性横断面评估
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023 Mar 27;9(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01277-3.
10
A review of the factors influencing adoption of digital health applications for people living with dementia.影响痴呆症患者采用数字健康应用程序的因素综述。
Digit Health. 2023 Mar 15;9:20552076231162985. doi: 10.1177/20552076231162985. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
患者和医护人员对手术患者安全清单的建议 - 一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jan 16;20(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4888-1.
4
eHealth and mHealth interventions in pediatric cancer: A systematic review of interventions across the cancer continuum.电子健康和移动医疗干预在儿科癌症中的应用:对癌症连续体中各项干预措施的系统评价。
Psychooncology. 2020 Jan;29(1):17-37. doi: 10.1002/pon.5280. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
5
Taking Control of Your Surgery: Impact of a Prehabilitation Program on Major Abdominal Surgery.掌控你的手术:术前康复计划对大型腹部手术的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2019 Jan;228(1):72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.09.018. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
6
Patients' Acceptance of Smartphone Health Technology for Chronic Disease Management: A Theoretical Model and Empirical Test.患者对用于慢性病管理的智能手机健康技术的接受度:一个理论模型与实证检验
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Dec 6;5(12):e177. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7886.
7
Black and minority ethnic group involvement in health and social care research: A systematic review.少数民族群体参与健康和社会保健研究:系统评价。
Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):3-22. doi: 10.1111/hex.12597. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
8
Smokers' and drinkers' choice of smartphone applications and expectations of engagement: a think aloud and interview study.吸烟者和饮酒者对智能手机应用程序的选择及参与期望:一项出声思考与访谈研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Feb 28;17(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0422-8.
9
What is the economic evidence for mHealth? A systematic review of economic evaluations of mHealth solutions.移动健康的经济证据是什么?对移动健康解决方案经济评估的系统综述。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 2;12(2):e0170581. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170581. eCollection 2017.
10
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Review.术后加速康复:综述。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Mar 1;152(3):292-298. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952.