De Jesus Maria, Hendrickson Zoé, Rivara Julia, Barrington Clare, Donastorg Yeycy, Perez Martha, Gomez Hoisex, Mbwambo Jessie, Likindikoki Samuel, Kerrigan Deanna
Department of Environment, Development, and Health, School of International Service, American University, Washington, DC, USA.
Center on Health, Risk, and Society, American University, Washington, DC, USA.
BMC Glob Public Health. 2024 Jan 16;2(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s44263-023-00032-3.
Mobility is a key social determinant of health for female sex workers (FSWs). While extant research has focused on the adverse effects of mobility for FSWs, there are very few studies that have examined the multiple ways in which mobility may impact the lives of these mobile women from their perspective. This qualitative study aims to fill this gap by exploring how mobility impacts the lives, livelihoods, and HIV care and treatment from the perspectives of women living with HIV in two epidemic settings, the Dominican Republic and Tanzania.
We conducted two rounds of in-depth interviews with 12 Dominican women and 12 Tanzanian women who were 18 years plus, had an HIV-positive diagnosis, and reported having exchanged sex for money in the last month. We utilized thematic analysis with a focus on intra- and intercomparisons to observe patterns within and across the two contexts.
We identified a salient pattern of three thematic "mobility paradoxes," which related to both disruptors and benefits of sex work mobility: (1) uncertainty versus autonomy: while sex work mobility often took place in contexts of vulnerability, which often led to women experiencing violence, it simultaneously benefitted women by allowing them to choose where they stayed and make plans on their terms; (2) financial insecurity versus profitability: although participants sometimes made less money than expected when they traveled for sex work, there was a powerful economic benefit for mobile women as it increased their likelihood of profitability; and (3) disorder and interruptions versus strategy and social support in HIV care and treatment: participants reported that they were sometimes inconsistent with their HIV appointments and medications when they traveled for sex work. On the other hand, mobility contributed to participants often becoming more strategic and creative in their HIV care and treatment and relying on one another for support.
Findings indicate that sex work mobility is a nuanced, complex, and paradoxical phenomenon. Implications include the development of strengths-based and community empowerment mobile health initiatives tailored to mitigate disruptors of mobility while maximizing benefits for this population.
流动性是女性性工作者健康的关键社会决定因素。虽然现有研究关注流动性对女性性工作者的不利影响,但很少有研究从她们的角度探讨流动性可能以多种方式影响这些流动女性生活的情况。这项定性研究旨在通过从多米尼加共和国和坦桑尼亚这两个流行地区感染艾滋病毒的女性的角度,探索流动性如何影响她们的生活、生计以及艾滋病毒护理和治疗,来填补这一空白。
我们对12名多米尼加女性和12名坦桑尼亚女性进行了两轮深入访谈,这些女性年龄在18岁及以上,被诊断为艾滋病毒阳性,且报告在过去一个月内有过以性换钱行为。我们采用主题分析,重点是内部和相互比较,以观察两种情况下的模式。
我们确定了一个突出的模式,即三个主题性的“流动性悖论”,这与性工作流动性的干扰因素和益处都有关:(1)不确定性与自主性:虽然性工作流动性往往发生在易受伤害的环境中,这常常导致女性遭受暴力,但它同时也使女性受益,因为这使她们能够选择停留的地点并按自己的条件制定计划;(2)经济不安全与盈利能力:尽管参与者在为性工作出行时有时赚的钱比预期少,但流动女性有强大的经济利益,因为这增加了她们盈利的可能性;(3)艾滋病毒护理和治疗中的无序与中断与策略和社会支持:参与者报告说,她们在为性工作出行时,有时会不按时进行艾滋病毒检查和服药。另一方面,流动性促使参与者在艾滋病毒护理和治疗方面往往变得更有策略和创造力,并相互依靠以获得支持。
研究结果表明,性工作流动性是一个细微、复杂且自相矛盾的现象。其影响包括制定基于优势和社区赋权的流动健康倡议,以减轻流动性的干扰因素,同时为这一人群最大限度地带来益处。