• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用悉尼系统对分类和报告淋巴结细胞学病理进行恶性肿瘤风险评估。

Assessment of risk of malignancy by application of the proposed Sydney system for classification and reporting lymph node cytopathology.

机构信息

Department of Cytology and Gynecologic Pathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Department of Pathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

Cancer Cytopathol. 2021 Sep;129(9):701-718. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22432. Epub 2021 Apr 8.

DOI:10.1002/cncy.22432
PMID:33830657
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is one of the most commonly used techniques for evaluating lymphadenopathy. Recently, the Sydney system was proposed for assessing the performance, classification, and reporting of lymph node (LN) cytopathology. The present study was conducted to assess the risk of malignancy associated with each of the diagnostic categories of the proposed Sydney system.

METHODS

This was a 2-year retrospective study of LN-FNAs; cytologic diagnoses were categorized by the proposed Sydney system. Cytological diagnoses were correlated with the corresponding histopathological diagnoses to assess diagnostic accuracy and risk of malignancy for each diagnostic category.

RESULTS

Of 23,335 FNAs during the study period, 6983 (30%) were performed on LNs. Of these, 289 (4.1%) cases were reported as nondiagnostic/inadequate (L1); 3397 (48.6%) were reported as benign (L2); 33(0.5%) as atypical cells of undetermined significance (L3), 96 (1.4%) as suspicious for malignancy (L4) and 3168 (45.4%) as malignant (L5). Subsequent histopathology was available for 618 (8.8%) cases. On cytohistopathologic correlation, 552 (89.3%) were concordant and 66 (10.7%) discordant. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and diagnostic accuracy of LN-FNA were 79.9%, 98.7%, 98.4%, 83.1%, and 89.3%, respectively. The risk of malignancy was 27.5% for the nondiagnostic category, 11.5% for the benign, 66.7% for the atypical, 88% for the suspicious, and 99.6% for the malignant categories.

CONCLUSIONS

FNAC has high diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of various LN pathologies. Application of the proposed Sydney system can help in achieving uniformity and reproducibility in cytologic diagnoses and also help in risk-stratification on cytology.

摘要

背景

细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC)是评估淋巴结疾病最常用的技术之一。最近,悉尼系统被提出用于评估淋巴结(LN)细胞学病理的性能、分类和报告。本研究旨在评估拟议的悉尼系统的每个诊断类别与恶性肿瘤风险的相关性。

方法

这是一项为期 2 年的 LN-FNAC 回顾性研究;细胞学诊断通过拟议的悉尼系统进行分类。将细胞学诊断与相应的组织病理学诊断进行比较,以评估每个诊断类别的诊断准确性和恶性肿瘤风险。

结果

在研究期间,23335 例 FNAs 中有 6983 例(30%)是对 LNs 进行的。其中,289 例(4.1%)报告为非诊断/不足(L1);3397 例(48.6%)报告为良性(L2);33 例(0.5%)为意义未明的不典型细胞(L3),96 例(1.4%)为可疑恶性(L4),3168 例(45.4%)为恶性(L5)。随后的组织病理学检查可用于 618 例(8.8%)病例。在细胞病理相关性方面,552 例(89.3%)是一致的,66 例(10.7%)是不一致的。LN-FNA 的总敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值以及诊断准确性分别为 79.9%、98.7%、98.4%、83.1%和 89.3%。诊断为非诊断性的恶性肿瘤风险为 27.5%,良性的为 11.5%,不典型的为 66.7%,可疑的为 88%,恶性的为 99.6%。

结论

FNAC 对各种 LN 病理的诊断具有很高的准确性。应用拟议的悉尼系统有助于在细胞学诊断中实现一致性和可重复性,并有助于在细胞学上进行风险分层。

相似文献

1
Assessment of risk of malignancy by application of the proposed Sydney system for classification and reporting lymph node cytopathology.应用悉尼系统对分类和报告淋巴结细胞学病理进行恶性肿瘤风险评估。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2021 Sep;129(9):701-718. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22432. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
2
Utility of the Proposed Sydney System for Classification of Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytopathology of Lymph Node: A Retrospective Study at a Tertiary Care Center.建议的悉尼系统对淋巴结细针抽吸细胞学分类的效用:三级保健中心的回顾性研究。
Acta Cytol. 2023;67(5):455-467. doi: 10.1159/000530984. Epub 2023 May 11.
3
Diagnostic accuracy of Thinprep® in cervical lymph node aspiration: Assessment according to the Sydney system.液基薄层细胞学技术(Thinprep)在颈淋巴结细针抽吸中的诊断准确性:根据悉尼系统评估。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2022 May;50(5):253-262. doi: 10.1002/dc.24943. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
4
Real-world experience with the Sydney System on 1458 cases of lymph node fine needle aspiration cytology.1458 例淋巴结细针抽吸细胞学检查的悉尼系统真实世界经验。
Cytopathology. 2022 Mar;33(2):166-175. doi: 10.1111/cyt.13079. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
5
Lymph node FNA cytology: Diagnostic performance and clinical implications of proposed diagnostic categories.淋巴结细针穿刺抽吸活检细胞学检查:拟议诊断分类的诊断效能及临床意义
Cancer Cytopathol. 2022 Feb;130(2):144-153. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22523. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
6
A Novel Approach to Classification and Reporting of Lymph Node Fine-Needle Cytology: Application of the Proposed Sydney System.一种淋巴结细针细胞学分类与报告的新方法:拟议悉尼系统的应用
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jul 21;11(8):1314. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11081314.
7
The Application of the Proposed Sydney System for Reporting Lymph Node Cytopathology: A Five-Year Experience of an Academic Institution in South India.提出的悉尼系统在报告淋巴结细胞病理学中的应用:印度南部一所学术机构的五年经验。
Acta Cytol. 2023;67(4):365-377. doi: 10.1159/000530038. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
8
Sydney Reporting System for Lymph Node Fine-Needle Aspiration and Malignancy Risk Stratification: Is It of Clinical Value?悉尼淋巴结细针穿刺报告系统与恶性风险分层:具有临床价值吗?
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Aug 17;14(16):1801. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14161801.
9
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Accuracy of the Sydney System for Reporting Lymph Node Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy in Diagnosing Malignancy.悉尼系统报告淋巴结细针穿刺活检诊断恶性肿瘤的诊断准确性的系统评价和荟萃分析
Acta Cytol. 2024;68(1):13-25. doi: 10.1159/000535797. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
10
Diagnostic Accuracy of Lymph Nodes Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy Based on The Sydney System for Reporting Lymph Node Cytology.基于悉尼系统报告淋巴结细胞学的淋巴结细针抽吸活检的诊断准确性。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023 Jun 1;24(6):1917-1922. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.6.1917.

引用本文的文献

1
Not Enough Cells: How Insufficient Cytological Specimens Are Mirrored by Reporting Systems - Journey from the Bethesda to the WHO Reporting Systems.细胞数量不足:报告系统如何反映细胞学标本不足——从贝塞斯达报告系统到世界卫生组织报告系统的历程
Acta Cytol. 2025 Jun 17:1-12. doi: 10.1159/000546947.
2
Ultrasound-Guided Versus Freehand Fine Needle Aspiration: A Comparative Study in Diagnosing Non-Salivary, Non-Thyroidal Head, and Neck Masses.超声引导与徒手细针穿刺抽吸:诊断非唾液腺、非甲状腺头颈部肿块的比较研究
Cureus. 2025 Apr 23;17(4):e82830. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82830. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Utility of Sydney system for reporting the neck lymphadenopathy underwent real-time ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration.
悉尼系统用于报告颈部淋巴结病的实用性接受了实时超声引导下细针穿刺抽吸。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 21;15(1):9724. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93330-9.
4
Evaluation of Fine-Needle Aspiration of Lymph Nodes and Assessment of Risk of Malignancy Based on the Sydney System of Reporting Lymph Node Cytology.基于悉尼淋巴结细胞学报告系统的淋巴结细针穿刺评估及恶性风险评估
J Cytol. 2024 Jan-Mar;42(1):11-19. doi: 10.4103/joc.joc_20_24. Epub 2025 Feb 11.
5
Application of the Sydney System for Classification and Reporting Lymph Node Cytopathology to Assess the Risk of Malignancy and its Diagnostic Accuracy.应用悉尼系统进行淋巴结细胞病理学分类和报告以评估恶性风险及其诊断准确性。
J Cytol. 2024 Oct-Dec;41(4):201-206. doi: 10.4103/joc.joc_168_23. Epub 2024 Nov 8.
6
Sydney Reporting System for Lymph Node Fine-Needle Aspiration and Malignancy Risk Stratification: Is It of Clinical Value?悉尼淋巴结细针穿刺报告系统与恶性风险分层:具有临床价值吗?
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Aug 17;14(16):1801. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14161801.
7
The Sydney system for lymph node FNA biopsy cytopathology: A detailed analysis of recent publications and meta-analysis and a proposal for the components of an ideal prospective study of a cytopathology reporting system.悉尼淋巴结细针穿刺活检细胞病理学系统:对近期出版物及荟萃分析的详细剖析以及关于细胞病理学报告系统理想前瞻性研究组成部分的提议。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2024 Dec;132(12):745-756. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22890. Epub 2024 Aug 4.
8
Double trouble: insights from a rare case of extranodal composite lymphoma in an elderly man, with comprehensive literature review.双重麻烦:一名老年男性罕见的结外复合淋巴瘤病例分析及文献综述
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Jun 15;16(6):2599-2606. doi: 10.62347/SIYT5520. eCollection 2024.
9
Response to comment on "A stepwise approach to fine needle aspiration cytology of lymph nodes".对《淋巴结细针穿刺细胞学检查的逐步方法》评论的回应
J Pathol Transl Med. 2024 Jan;58(1):43-44. doi: 10.4132/jptm.2023.12.04. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
10
Comment on "A stepwise approach to fine needle aspiration cytology of lymph nodes".关于“淋巴结细针穿刺细胞学检查的逐步方法”的评论
J Pathol Transl Med. 2024 Jan;58(1):40-42. doi: 10.4132/jptm.2023.11.05. Epub 2024 Jan 10.