Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Aug;75:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.03.019. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
In the last two decades, vascular surgery training evolved from exclusively learning open skills to learning endovascular skills in addition to a functional reduction in training duration with 0+5 residency programs. The implications for this on trainee evolution to independence are unknown. We aimed to assess self-perceived comfort performing open and endovascular procedures and to identify predictors of high comfort among senior vascular surgery trainees and recent graduates.
Junior and senior 0+5 vascular surgery residents, traditional fellows, and attendings in their first 4 years of practice were asked to complete a survey assessing the number of vascular procedures performed to date, comfort performing these procedures on a Likert scale, and validated scales of self-efficacy and grit. Groups were then matched by training level and age. Logistic regression identified independent predictors of the top quartile of self-perceived comfort performing procedures.
Surveys were completed by 92 trainees and 71 attending surgeons in their first 4 years of practice. After matching, completing ≥7 open juxtarenal aortic repairs (OR = 4.73, 95% CI = 1.59-14.07) and a higher self-efficacy score (OR = 3.24, 95% CI = 1.20-8.76), were independent predictors of top quartile comfort performing open vascular procedures. 0+5 residency training inversely correlated with top quartile comfort performing open vascular operations (OR = 0.12, 95% CI = 0.03-0.47). Completing ≥7 complex EVARs (OR = 3.94, 95% CI = 1.61-9.59) and a higher self-efficacy personality score (OR = 2.76, 95% CI = 1.09-7.02) were predictors of top quartile comfort performing endovascular procedures.
In this nationally representative survey, both trainees and junior attendings completed a paucity of complex open vascular cases, which corresponded to reduced comfort performing these procedures. Furthermore, 0+5 residency training was associated with lower self-perceived comfort performing open vascular surgery, a trend that persisted through the first years of practice. Endovascular comfort did not show a similar correlation.
在过去的二十年中,血管外科学培训从仅学习开放技能演变为除了培训时间缩短至 0+5 住院医师培训外,还增加了学习血管内技能。这对学员走向独立的影响尚不清楚。我们旨在评估实习生对开放和血管内手术的自我感知舒适度,并确定高级血管外科学员和最近毕业生中高舒适度的预测因素。
初级和高级 0+5 血管外科住院医师、传统研究员以及从业头 4 年的主治医生被要求完成一项调查,评估他们迄今为止完成的血管手术数量、在李克特量表上对这些手术的舒适度以及自我效能感和毅力的验证量表。然后按培训水平和年龄进行匹配。逻辑回归确定了自我感知手术舒适度最高四分位数的独立预测因素。
共有 92 名受训者和 71 名从业头 4 年的主治医生完成了调查。匹配后,完成≥7 例肾周主动脉修复的开放手术(OR=4.73,95%CI=1.59-14.07)和更高的自我效能感评分(OR=3.24,95%CI=1.20-8.76)是自我感知开放血管手术舒适度最高四分位数的独立预测因素。0+5 住院医师培训与开放血管手术舒适度最高四分位数呈负相关(OR=0.12,95%CI=0.03-0.47)。完成≥7 例复杂 EVAR(OR=3.94,95%CI=1.61-9.59)和更高的自我效能感人格评分(OR=2.76,95%CI=1.09-7.02)是自我感知血管内手术舒适度最高四分位数的预测因素。
在这项具有全国代表性的调查中,受训者和初级主治医生都完成了少量复杂的开放血管病例,这与他们对这些手术的舒适度降低有关。此外,0+5 住院医师培训与开放血管手术自我感知舒适度较低相关,这种趋势在实践的头几年仍持续存在。血管内舒适度没有表现出类似的相关性。