• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

妇科肿瘤学中的手术降级

Surgical Deescalation Within Gynecologic Oncology.

作者信息

Kanbergs Alexa, Melamed Alexander, Viveros-Carreño David, Wu Chi-Fang, Wilke Roni Nitecki, Zamorano Abigail, Paladugu Kimeera, Havrilesky Laura, Rauh-Hain Jose Alejandro, Agusti Nuria

机构信息

Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2453604. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53604.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53604
PMID:39775807
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11811805/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The goal of surgical deescalation is to minimize tissue damage, enhance patient outcomes, and reduce the adverse effects often associated with extensive or traditional surgical procedures. This shift toward less invasive techniques has the potential to revolutionize surgical practices, profoundly impacting the methods and training of future surgeons.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate adoption of surgical deescalation within the field of gynecologic oncology using The National Cancer Database.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study used prospectively collected data from the National Cancer Database from January 2004 to December 2020. Eligible participants included women in the US who received a diagnosis of clinical stage I to IV endometrial, ovarian, cervical, or vulvar cancer within this time frame. Data were analyzed between January and June 2024.

EXPOSURE

Diagnosis of stage I to IV endometrial, ovarian, cervical, or vulvar cancer.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was surgical deescalation, which included evaluation of receipt of surgical intervention, the surgical approach, the type of lymph node assessment, and salvage interventions for disease-affected organs. A Poisson model was applied to estimate the average annual percentage change (AAPC) in the receipt of surgical treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 1 218 490 patients (mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 61.2 [13.7] years) were included. Over the study period, the percentage of patients undergoing surgery decreased from 47.4% to 39.9% for those with cervical cancer (AAPC, -1.3%; 95% CI, -1.6% to -1.1%), from 72.0% to 67.9% for those with ovarian cancer (AAPC, -0.5%; 95% CI, -0.6% to -0.4%), from 83.7% to 79.1% for those with endometrial cancer (AAPC, -0.5%; 95% CI, -0.7% to 11 -0.4%), and from 81.1% to 72.6% for those with vulvar cancer (AAPC, -1.3%; 95% CI, -1.6% to -0.9%). The use of minimally invasive surgery increased from 45.8% to 82.2% for those with endometrial cancer (AAPC, 4.6%; 95% CI, 4.5% to 4.8%) and from 13.3% to 37.0% for those with ovarian cancer (AAPC, 9.4%; 95% CI, 9.0% to 9.7%). Sentinel lymph node dissection increased from 0.7% to 39.6% for patients with endometrial cancer (AAPC, 51.8%; 95% CI, 50.5% to 53.2%), from 0.2% to 10.6% for patients with cervical cancer (AAPC, 44.0%; 95% CI, 39.3% to 48.9%), and from 12.3% to 36.9% for patients with vulvar cancer (AAPC, 10.7%; 95% CI, 8.0% to 13.5%) cancers, whereas the rate of complete lymphadenectomies decreased in all 3 groups. The rate of fertility-sparing surgery for patients with cervical cancer younger than 40 years rose from 17.8% to 28.1% (AAPC, 3.1%; 95% CI, 2.3%-3.9%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These findings suggest that over the past 15 years, the field of gynecologic oncology has moved toward surgical deescalation through an overall reduction in the number of patients who undergo surgery, increased use of minimally invasive surgical techniques, and increased use of sentinel lymph node techniques. Future research should focus not only on understanding the impact of surgical escalation on patients (including disease outcomes, quality of life, and equitable access to these services), but also on surgical training.

摘要

重要性

手术降级的目标是将组织损伤降至最低,提高患者预后,并减少通常与广泛或传统手术相关的不良反应。这种向微创技术的转变有可能彻底改变手术实践,对未来外科医生的方法和培训产生深远影响。

目的

利用国家癌症数据库评估妇科肿瘤领域手术降级的采用情况。

设计、设置和参与者:这项队列研究使用了2004年1月至2020年12月从国家癌症数据库前瞻性收集的数据。符合条件的参与者包括在此时间段内被诊断为临床I至IV期子宫内膜癌、卵巢癌、宫颈癌或外阴癌的美国女性。数据于2024年1月至6月进行分析。

暴露因素

I至IV期子宫内膜癌、卵巢癌、宫颈癌或外阴癌的诊断。

主要结局和衡量指标

主要结局是手术降级,包括评估手术干预的接受情况、手术方式、淋巴结评估类型以及对受疾病影响器官的挽救性干预。应用泊松模型估计接受手术治疗的年均百分比变化(AAPC)。

结果

共纳入1218490例患者(诊断时的平均[标准差]年龄为61.2[13.7]岁)。在研究期间,宫颈癌患者接受手术的比例从47.4%降至39.9%(AAPC,-1.3%;95%CI,-1.6%至-1.1%),卵巢癌患者从72.0%降至67.9%(AAPC,-0.5%;95%CI,-0.6%至-0.4%),子宫内膜癌患者从83.7%降至79.1%(AAPC,-0.5%;95%CI,-0.7%至-0.4%),外阴癌患者从81.1%降至72.6%(AAPC,-1.3%;95%CI,-1.6%至-0.9%)。子宫内膜癌患者使用微创手术的比例从45.8%增至82.2%(AAPC,4.6%;95%CI,4.5%至4.8%),卵巢癌患者从13.3%增至37.0%(AAPC,9.4%;95%CI,9.0%至9.7%)。子宫内膜癌患者前哨淋巴结清扫率从0.7%增至39.6%(AAPC,51.8%;95%CI,50.5%至53.2%),宫颈癌患者从0.2%增至10.6%(AAPC,44.0%;95%CI,39.3%至48.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d51/11811805/cf64e4645a08/jamanetwopen-e2453604-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d51/11811805/ee575d0ff801/jamanetwopen-e2453604-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d51/11811805/e8758dd139e9/jamanetwopen-e2453604-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d51/11811805/7ae2d7479b6d/jamanetwopen-e2453604-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d51/11811805/49f278138e82/jamanetwopen-e2453604-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d51/11811805/cf64e4645a08/jamanetwopen-e2453604-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d51/11811805/ee575d0ff801/jamanetwopen-e2453604-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d51/11811805/e8758dd139e9/jamanetwopen-e2453604-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d51/11811805/7ae2d7479b6d/jamanetwopen-e2453604-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d51/11811805/49f278138e82/jamanetwopen-e2453604-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d51/11811805/cf64e4645a08/jamanetwopen-e2453604-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Surgical Deescalation Within Gynecologic Oncology.妇科肿瘤学中的手术降级
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2453604. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53604.
2
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.原发性手术后晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者残留病灶对生存预后的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD015048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015048.pub2.
3
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
4
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
5
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
6
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.卡莫司汀植入剂与替莫唑胺治疗新诊断的高级别胶质瘤的有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450.
7
Pre-operative endometrial thinning agents before endometrial destruction for heavy menstrual bleeding.对于月经过多患者,在进行子宫内膜破坏术前使用的术前子宫内膜减薄剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 15;2013(11):CD010241. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010241.pub2.
8
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
9
Does Augmenting Irradiated Autografts With Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Patients With Bone Loss From a Malignant Tumor Achieve Union, Function, and Complication Rate Comparably to Patients Without Bone Loss and Augmentation When Reconstructing Intercalary Resections in the Lower Extremity?对于因恶性肿瘤导致骨缺损的患者,在重建下肢节段性切除时,采用带血管游离腓骨移植来增强照射后的自体骨移植,其骨愈合、功能及并发症发生率与无骨缺损且未进行增强的患者相比是否相当?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003599.
10
Interventions for weight reduction in obesity to improve survival in women with endometrial cancer.肥胖症减肥干预措施以提高子宫内膜癌女性的生存率。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 27;3(3):CD012513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012513.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Current Limitations of Sentinel Node Biopsy in Vulvar Cancer.前哨淋巴结活检在外阴癌中的当前局限性
Curr Oncol. 2025 Apr 8;32(4):215. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32040215.
2
Error in Figure.图中存在错误。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e254391. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.4391.
3
Error in Byline.署名错误。

本文引用的文献

1
Simple versus Radical Hysterectomy in Women with Low-Risk Cervical Cancer.低危型宫颈癌患者行简化根治性子宫切除术与根治性子宫切除术的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2024 Feb 29;390(9):819-829. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2308900.
2
Perspectives of gynecologic oncology fellowship training and preparedness for practice.妇科肿瘤学专科培训前景及执业准备情况
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2023 Dec 20;51:101319. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2023.101319. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Breast Cancer, Version 4.2023.NCCN 指南®洞察:乳腺癌,第 4.2023 版。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e250959. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0959.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023 Jun;21(6):594-608. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.0031.
4
Time Trends and Variation in the Use of Active Surveillance for Management of Low-risk Prostate Cancer in the US.美国低危前列腺癌管理中主动监测应用的时间趋势和变化。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e231439. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1439.
5
Births: Final Data for 2021.出生情况:2021年最终数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2023 Jan;72(1):1-53.
6
Sentinel lymphatic mapping for gynecologic malignancies.前哨淋巴结定位在妇科恶性肿瘤中的应用。
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Feb 1;35(1):43-53. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000841.
7
A systematic review of the reproductive and oncologic outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery for early-stage cervical cancer.早期宫颈癌保留生育功能手术的生殖及肿瘤学结局的系统评价
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2022 Dec 8;23(4):287-313. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2022.2022-9-7.
8
Risk-adapted modulation through de-intensification of cancer treatments: an ESMO classification.风险适应的癌症治疗减量化调节:ESMO 分类。
Ann Oncol. 2022 Jul;33(7):702-712. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.03.273. Epub 2022 May 9.
9
De-escalation in breast cancer surgery.乳腺癌手术的降阶梯治疗
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2022 Feb 23;8(1):25. doi: 10.1038/s41523-022-00383-4.
10
ConCerv: a prospective trial of conservative surgery for low-risk early-stage cervical cancer.ConCerv:低危早期宫颈癌保守性手术的前瞻性研究。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 Oct;31(10):1317-1325. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002921. Epub 2021 Sep 7.