Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Research and Evaluation Unit, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta, 10020-100 Street NW, Edmonton, AB, 2700T5J 0N3, Canada.
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Apr 8;22(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01415-x.
The inappropriate and/or high prescribing of benzodiazepine and 'Z' drugs (BDZ +) is a major health concern. The purpose of this study was to determine whether physician or pharmacist led interventions or a simple letter or a personalized prescribing report from a medical regulatory authority (MRA) was the most effective intervention for reducing BDZ + prescribing by physicians to patients 65 years of age or older.
This was a four-armed, one year, blinded, randomized, parallel-group, investigational trial in Alberta, Canada. Participants were fully licensed physicians (n = 272) who had prescribed 4 times the defined daily dose (4 + DDD) or more of any BDZ + to an older patient at least once in the 3 quarter of 2016. All physician-participants were sent a personalized prescribing profile by the MRA. They were then randomized into four groups that received either nothing more, an additional personal warning letter from the MRA, a personal phone call from an MRA pharmacist or a personal phone call from an MRA physician. The main outcomes were prescribing behavior change of physicians at one year in terms of: change in mean number of older patients receiving 4 + DDD BDZ + and mean dose BDZ + prescribed per physician. To adjust for multiple statistical testing, we used MANCOVA to test both main outcome measures simultaneously by group whilst controlling for any baseline differences.
All groups experienced a significant fall in the total number of older patients receiving 4 + DDD of BDZ + by about 50% (range 43-54%) per physician at one year, and a fall in the mean dose of BDZ + prescribed of about 13% (range 10-16%). However, there was no significant difference between each group.
A personalized prescribing report alone sent from the MRA appears to be an effective intervention for reducing very high levels of BDZ + prescribing in older patients. Additional interventions by a pharmacist or physician did not result in additional benefit. The intervention needs to be tested further on a more general population of physicians, prescribing less extreme doses of BDZ + and that looks at more clinical and healthcare utilization outcomes.
苯二氮䓬类药物(BDZ+)和“Z 类”药物的不当和/或高处方率是一个主要的健康问题。本研究的目的是确定医师或药剂师主导的干预措施、简单的信函、还是来自医疗监管机构(MRA)的个性化处方报告对减少 65 岁及以上患者的 BDZ+处方最有效。
这是一项在加拿大阿尔伯塔省进行的为期一年、双盲、随机、平行组、研究性试验。参与者为完全许可的医师(n=272),他们在 2016 年第三季度至少有一次为一名老年患者开具了 4 倍或以上的任何 BDZ+的规定日剂量(4+DDD)。所有医师参与者都收到了 MRA 发送的个性化处方简介。然后,他们被随机分为四组,分别接受以下干预:不再接受任何干预、MRA 额外发送个人警告信、MRA 药剂师的个人电话或 MRA 医师的个人电话。主要结局是在一年内衡量医师的处方行为变化:接受 4+DDD BDZ+的老年患者人数的平均值变化以及每位医师开具的 BDZ+剂量的平均值变化。为了调整多重统计检验,我们使用 MANCOVA 同时测试两组的两个主要结局测量值,同时控制任何基线差异。
所有组在一年内接受 4+DDD 的 BDZ+的老年患者总数均显著下降,每位医师约下降 50%(范围 43-54%),BDZ+的平均剂量下降约 13%(范围 10-16%)。然而,组间没有显著差异。
仅由 MRA 发送的个性化处方报告似乎是减少老年患者中非常高水平的 BDZ+处方的有效干预措施。药剂师或医师的额外干预并没有带来额外的益处。需要在更广泛的医师人群中进一步测试该干预措施,以评估其对处方较少极端剂量的 BDZ+的效果,并关注更多的临床和医疗利用结果。