Suppr超能文献

减少药物使用实施试验的结果和对专家建议的依从性:系统评价。

Outcomes in deprescribing implementation trials and compliance with expert recommendations: a systematic review.

机构信息

Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, 44000, Pharmacie, France.

U1246 SPHERE "methodS in Patient-Centered Outcomes and HEalth ResEarch", Université de Nantes, Université de Tours, INSERM, Nantes, France.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2023 Jul 12;23(1):428. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04155-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Deprescribing, defined as discontinuing or reducing the dose of medications that are no longer needed or for which the risks outweigh the benefits is a way to reduce polypharmacy. In 2022, the US Deprescribing Research Network (USDeN) published recommendations concerning the measurement of outcomes for deprescribing intervention studies. The objectives of this systematic review were to identify the outcome categories used in deprescribing intervention trials and to relate them to the previously published recommendations.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsychInfo, and the Cochrane library from January 2012 through January 2022. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials evaluating a deprescribing intervention. After data extraction, outcomes were categorized by type: medication outcomes, clinical outcomes, system outcomes, implementation outcomes, and other outcomes based on the previously published recommendations.

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies were included. The majority of studies focused on older adults in nursing homes and targeted inappropriate medications or polypharmacy. In 20 studies, the intervention was a medication review; in seven studies, the intervention was educational or informative; and three studies based their intervention on motivational interviewing or patient empowerment. Thirty-one studies presented a medication outcome (primary outcome in 26 studies), 25 a clinical outcome, 18 a system outcome, and seven an implementation outcome. Only three studies presented all four types of outcomes, and 10 studies presented three types of outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides an update on the implementation of gold standard deprescribing studies in clinical practice. Implementation outcomes need to be developed and specified to facilitate the implementation of these practices on a larger scale and clinical outcome need to be prioritized. Finally, this review provides new elements for future real-life deprescribing studies.

摘要

背景

去处方化是指停止或减少不再需要或风险超过获益的药物剂量,这是减少多重用药的一种方法。2022 年,美国去处方化研究网络(USDeN)发布了关于去处方化干预研究结果测量的建议。本系统综述的目的是确定去处方化干预试验中使用的结果类别,并将其与之前发表的建议联系起来。

方法

我们检索了 MEDLINE、Embase、PsychInfo 和 Cochrane 图书馆,检索时间从 2012 年 1 月到 2022 年 1 月。纳入的研究为评估去处方化干预的随机对照试验。数据提取后,根据之前发表的建议,将结果分为药物结果、临床结果、系统结果、实施结果和其他结果。

结果

共纳入 36 项研究。大多数研究集中在疗养院的老年人身上,针对的是不适当的药物或多重用药。20 项研究的干预措施是药物审查;7 项研究的干预措施是教育或信息;3 项研究基于动机性访谈或患者赋权。31 项研究报告了药物结果(26 项研究中的主要结果),25 项研究报告了临床结果,18 项研究报告了系统结果,7 项研究报告了实施结果。只有 3 项研究报告了所有 4 种类型的结果,10 项研究报告了 3 种类型的结果。

结论

本综述提供了关于在临床实践中实施去处方化黄金标准研究的最新情况。需要制定和明确实施结果,以促进这些实践的更大规模实施,需要优先考虑临床结果。最后,本综述为未来的真实生活去处方化研究提供了新的元素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d4/10337166/302d09b59f61/12877_2023_4155_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验