Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jun;44(6):1324-1333. doi: 10.2337/dc20-2109. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mulberry twig alkaloids (Sangzhi alkaloids [SZ-A]) in the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D).
This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, and parallel controlled noninferiority clinical trial that was conducted for 24 weeks. A total of 600 patients were randomly allocated to the SZ-A group ( 360) or acarbose group ( 240). The primary efficacy end point was the change of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA) compared with baseline. In addition, adverse events (AEs), severe AEs (SAEs), treatment-related AEs (TAEs), and gastrointestinal disorders (GDs) were monitored.
After treatment for 24 weeks, the change in HbA was -0.93% (95% CI -1.03 to -0.83) (-10.2 mmol/mol [-11.3 to -9.1]) and -0.87% (-0.99 to -0.76) (-9.5 mmol/mol [-10.8 to -8.3]) in the SZ-A and acarbose groups, respectively, and the least squares mean difference was -0.05% (95% CI -0.18 to 0.07) (-0.5 mmol/mol [-2.0 to 0.8]) between the two groups, with no significant difference on the basis of covariance analysis ( > 0.05). The incidence of TAEs and GDs was significantly lower in the SZ-A group than the acarbose group ( < 0.01), but no differences for AEs or SAEs between the two groups were observed ( > 0.05).
SZ-A exhibited equivalent hypoglycemic effects to acarbose in patients with T2D. Nevertheless, the incidence of TAEs and GDs was lower following SZ-A treatment than acarbose treatment, suggesting good safety.
本研究旨在评估桑枝生物碱(桑枝生物碱[SZ-A])治疗 2 型糖尿病(T2D)的疗效和安全性。
这是一项多中心、随机、双盲、双模拟、平行对照的非劣效性临床试验,持续 24 周。共纳入 600 例患者,随机分为 SZ-A 组(n=360)或阿卡波糖组(n=240)。主要疗效终点为与基线相比糖化血红蛋白(HbA)的变化。此外,还监测了不良事件(AE)、严重不良事件(SAE)、治疗相关不良事件(TAE)和胃肠道疾病(GD)。
治疗 24 周后,SZ-A 组和阿卡波糖组的 HbA 变化分别为-0.93%(95%CI-1.03 至-0.83)(-10.2mmol/mol[-11.3 至-9.1])和-0.87%(95%CI-0.99 至-0.76)(-9.5mmol/mol[-10.8 至-8.3]),两组间最小二乘均值差值为-0.05%(95%CI-0.18 至 0.07)(-0.5mmol/mol[-2.0 至 0.8]),基于协方差分析无显著差异(>0.05)。SZ-A 组 TAE 和 GD 的发生率明显低于阿卡波糖组(<0.01),但两组间 AE 或 SAE 发生率无差异(>0.05)。
SZ-A 对 T2D 患者的降糖作用与阿卡波糖相当。然而,SZ-A 治疗后的 TAE 和 GD 发生率低于阿卡波糖治疗,提示安全性良好。