• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

值得冒险吗?同期双侧乳房重建术的预防性对侧乳房切除术。

Is It Worth the Risk? Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy With Immediate Bilateral Breast Reconstruction.

机构信息

From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center.

Columbia University Medical School, New York, NY.

出版信息

Ann Plast Surg. 2021 Jul 1;87(1s Suppl 1):S2-S6. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002802.

DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000002802
PMID:33833183
Abstract

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of women are choosing to undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomy with immediate bilateral breast reconstruction. Operating on the contralateral noncancer side is not without its own set of risks. We sought to compare complication rates between the cancerous and contralateral prophylactic breasts.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of all patients undergoing immediate postmastectomy bilateral breast reconstruction for unilateral breast cancer between January 2008 and January 2019 at a single institution. Data were collected on patient demographics, cancer and adjuvant/neoadjuvant treatments, tumor, reconstruction, hospital stay, and complications. Complications were compared between the cancerous and the noncancerous breasts.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty patients met the inclusion criteria of this study. Of these 160 patients, 33 (20.6%) had complications (major and minor) only to the cancerous breast, 7 (4.4%) had complications only to the noncancerous breast, and 7 (4.4%) had bilateral complications. Most patients underwent tissue expander/implant reconstruction (93.8%) with the rest (6.2%) undergoing abdominally based flap or latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction. Patients with complications were more likely to have hypertension, diabetes, exposure to radiation, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Complications included wound dehiscence, hematoma, cellulitis, seroma, capsular contracture, infected implant, and skin necrosis. Overall, there were significantly more complications to the cancerous breasts than the noncancerous breasts (P < 0.001). In addition, although exposure to radiation to the affected side significantly increased the likelihood of complications to that side (P < 0.0001), patients who were not exposed to any radiation were also more likely to have complications to the cancer side than to the noncancer side (P = 0.00065). However, after controlling for the effects of radiation, there was no significant difference in complications between the cancer side and the prophylactic side when stratifying by specific complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Although contralateral prophylactic mastectomy with immediate bilateral reconstruction is not without added risk when compared with a unilateral procedure, this study shows that the incidence of complications to the noncancerous breast is less than that to the cancerous breast. This information can be used to help counsel patients with unilateral breast cancer on their treatment options and associated risks.

摘要

背景

越来越多的女性选择接受对侧预防性乳房切除术并立即进行双侧乳房重建。对非癌侧进行手术并非没有其自身的一系列风险。我们旨在比较癌症侧和对侧预防性乳房的并发症发生率。

方法

对 2008 年 1 月至 2019 年 1 月期间在一家机构接受单侧乳腺癌即刻乳房切除术后双侧乳房重建的所有患者进行回顾性分析。收集患者人口统计学资料、癌症及辅助/新辅助治疗、肿瘤、重建、住院时间和并发症等数据。比较癌症侧和非癌症侧的并发症。

结果

160 例患者符合本研究纳入标准。在这 160 例患者中,仅癌症侧出现(主要和次要)并发症的有 33 例(20.6%),仅非癌症侧出现并发症的有 7 例(4.4%),双侧出现并发症的有 7 例(4.4%)。大多数患者接受了组织扩张器/植入物重建(93.8%),其余 6.2%接受了腹部皮瓣或背阔肌皮瓣重建。有并发症的患者更有可能患有高血压、糖尿病、接受过放疗和新辅助化疗。并发症包括伤口裂开、血肿、蜂窝织炎、血清肿、包膜挛缩、感染的植入物和皮肤坏死。总体而言,癌症侧的并发症明显多于非癌症侧(P<0.001)。此外,尽管患侧接受放疗显著增加了该侧发生并发症的可能性(P<0.0001),但未接受任何放疗的患者癌症侧发生并发症的可能性也高于非癌症侧(P=0.00065)。然而,在控制放疗影响后,按特定并发症分层时,癌症侧和预防性侧的并发症发生率没有显著差异。

结论

虽然与单侧手术相比,对侧预防性乳房切除术联合即刻双侧重建并非没有额外风险,但本研究表明,非癌症侧的并发症发生率低于癌症侧。这些信息可用于帮助单侧乳腺癌患者了解其治疗方案和相关风险。

相似文献

1
Is It Worth the Risk? Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy With Immediate Bilateral Breast Reconstruction.值得冒险吗?同期双侧乳房重建术的预防性对侧乳房切除术。
Ann Plast Surg. 2021 Jul 1;87(1s Suppl 1):S2-S6. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002802.
2
Assessing the additional surgical risk of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and immediate breast implant reconstruction.评估对侧预防性乳房切除术和即刻乳房植入重建的额外手术风险。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jan;179(2):255-265. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05460-0. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
3
Comparing Outcomes in the Therapeutic and Prophylactic Breast for Bilateral Mastectomy With Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.比较双侧乳房切除术治疗性和预防性乳房植入物再造的结果。
Ann Plast Surg. 2023 Jun 1;90(6S Suppl 4):S375-S378. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003460. Epub 2023 Feb 18.
4
A Comparison of Complications in Therapeutic versus Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Reconstruction: A Paired Analysis.保乳术后与对侧预防性乳房切除术重建的并发症比较:配对分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 May 1;149(5):1037-1047. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008981. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
5
Reconstructive outcomes in patients undergoing contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.接受对侧预防性乳房切除术患者的重建效果。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Nov;128(5):1025-1033. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31822b6682.
6
Staged breast reconstruction with saline-filled implants in the irradiated breast: recent trends and therapeutic implications.在接受过放疗的乳房中使用盐水填充式植入物进行分期乳房重建:近期趋势及治疗意义
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000 Mar;105(3):930-42. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200003000-00016.
7
Indocyanine green angiography for preventing postoperative mastectomy skin flap necrosis in immediate breast reconstruction.吲哚菁绿血管造影术在即刻乳房重建中预防乳房切除术后皮瓣坏死的应用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 22;4(4):CD013280. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013280.pub2.
8
The Impact of Premastectomy Versus Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy on Outcomes in Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.保乳术与乳房切除术术后放疗对胸肌前假体植入式乳房再造术结局的影响。
Ann Plast Surg. 2021 Jul 1;87(1s Suppl 1):S21-S27. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002801.
9
Implant-based immediate reconstruction in prophylactic mastectomy: is the caudal dermis flap a reliable alternative to synthetic mesh or acellular dermal matrix?预防性乳房切除术的基于植入物的即刻重建:尾部真皮皮瓣是否是合成网或脱细胞真皮基质的可靠替代品?
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Apr;305(4):937-943. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06244-y. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
10
Delayed-immediate breast reconstruction.延迟即刻乳房重建。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 May;113(6):1617-28. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000117192.54945.88.

引用本文的文献

1
Complications of Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction in Prophylactic Versus Therapeutic Mastectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.预防性乳房切除术与治疗性乳房切除术中假体乳房重建的并发症:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Jun 19;13(6):e6904. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006904. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
EBCC-13 manifesto: Balancing pros and cons for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.EBCC-13 宣言:权衡利弊,决定是否行对侧预防性乳房切除术。
Eur J Cancer. 2023 Mar;181:79-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.11.036. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
3
Nationwide Trends in Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomies: An Analysis of 55,060 Unilateral Breast Cancer Patients.
对侧预防性乳房切除术的全国趋势:对55,060例单侧乳腺癌患者的分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 May 25;10(5):e4344. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004344. eCollection 2022 May.