Lemmens Lotte H J M, DeRubeis Robert J, Tang Tony Z, Schulte-Strathaus Julia C C, Huibers Marcus J H
Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 23;12:576432. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.576432. eCollection 2021.
The frequency and clinical impact of -large symptom improvements during a single between-session interval-in psychotherapy for depression have been well established. However, there have been relatively few efforts to identify the processes that lead to sudden gains. To explore therapy processes associated with sudden gains in cognitive therapy for depression by examining changes in the sessions surrounding the gains, and the session preceding the gain in particular. Using ratings of video-recordings ( = 36), we assessed the content, frequency and magnitude of within-session cognitive-, behavioral-, and interpersonal change, as well as the quality of the therapeutic alliance in the session prior to the gain (pre-gain session), the session after the gain (post-gain session) and a control session. After that, we contrasted scores in the pre-gain session with those in the control session. In addition, we examined changes that occurred between the pre- and post-gain session (between-session changes) and explored patients' attributions of change. Although not statistically significant, within-session changes were more frequent and stronger in the pre-gain session compared to the control session. The largest difference between the pre-gain and control session was found in the behavioral domain, and reached the level of trend-significance. There were more, and more impactful between-session changes in the interval during which the gain occurred as compared to a control interval. Exploratory analysis of attributions of change revealed eight subcategories, all corresponding with the cognitive-, behavioral- and interpersonal- domain. The quality of the therapeutic alliance was high and almost identical in all sessions. In spite of its small sample size, our study provides relevant descriptive information about potential precipitants of, themes related to, and attributions given for sudden gains. Furthermore, our study provides clear suggestions for future research. A better understanding of session content in the sessions surrounding sudden gains may provide insight into the mechanisms of change in psychotherapy, hereby suggesting treatment-enhancing strategies. We encourage researchers to conduct research that could clarify the nature of these mechanisms, and believe the methods used in this study could serve as a framework for further work in this area.
在抑郁症心理治疗中,单次治疗间期内出现较大症状改善的频率及其临床影响已得到充分证实。然而,识别导致突然好转的过程的相关研究相对较少。为了通过检查突然好转前后各 session 中的变化,特别是好转前的 session,来探索与抑郁症认知治疗中突然好转相关的治疗过程。我们使用视频记录评分(n = 36),评估了好转前 session(好转前 session)、好转后 session(好转后 session)和对照 session 中 session 内认知、行为和人际变化的内容、频率和幅度,以及治疗联盟的质量。之后,我们将好转前 session 的得分与对照 session 的得分进行了对比。此外,我们检查了好转前和好转后 session 之间发生的变化(session 间变化),并探讨了患者对变化的归因。尽管无统计学意义,但与对照 session 相比,好转前 session 中的 session 内变化更频繁、更强烈。好转前 session 与对照 session 之间的最大差异出现在行为领域,并达到趋势显著性水平。与对照间期相比,在出现好转的间期内,session 间变化更多且更具影响力。对变化归因的探索性分析揭示了八个子类别,均与认知、行为和人际领域相对应。所有 session 中治疗联盟的质量都很高且几乎相同。尽管样本量较小,但我们的研究提供了关于突然好转的潜在促成因素、相关主题和归因的相关描述性信息。此外,我们的研究为未来研究提供了明确建议。更好地理解突然好转前后各 session 的内容,可能有助于深入了解心理治疗中的变化机制,从而提出改善治疗的策略。我们鼓励研究人员开展能够阐明这些机制本质的研究,并认为本研究中使用的方法可作为该领域进一步研究的框架。