Jung Jinsei, Bae Seong Hoon, Han Ji Hyuk, Kwak Sang Hyun, Nam Gi Sung, Lee Phil Hyu, Sohn Young Ho, Yun Mijin, Ye Byung Seok
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Graduate school of Medical Science, Brain Korea 21 Project, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
J Clin Neurol. 2021 Apr;17(2):290-299. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2021.17.2.290.
The associations between hearing loss (HL) and the mechanisms underlying cognitive impairment (CI) remain unclear. We evaluated the effects of clinical factors, vascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) markers, and CI mechanisms on HL.
In total, 112 patients with CI (59% demented) and subjective HL prospectively underwent MRI, amyloid positron-emission tomography (PET), hearing evaluations, and neuropsychological tests including a language comprehension test. Patients were categorized into pure-Alzheimer's disease-related CI (ADCI), pure-Lewy-body disease-related CI (LBCI), mixed-ADCI/LBCI, and non-ADCI/LBCI groups based on clinical features and PET biomarkers.
The risk of peripheral HL [defined as a pure-tone average (PTA) threshold >40 dB] was higher in the pure-LBCI group than in the pure-ADCI and mixed-ADCI/LBCI groups, and lower in the presence of ADCI. The non-ADCI/LBCI group had the most-severe vascular MRI markers and showed a higher risk of peripheral HL than did the pure-ADCI and mixed-ADCI/LBCI groups. While the pure-LBCI group had a higher risk of comprehension dysfunction than the pure-ADCI group regardless of the PTA and the score on the Korean version of the Mini Mental State Examination (K-MMSE), those in the pure-LBCI group even with a better K-MMSE score had a risk of comprehension dysfunction comparable to that in the mixed-ADCI/LBCI group due to a worse PTA.
Peripheral HL could be associated with the absence of significant β-amyloid deposition in patients with CI and characteristic of the pure-LBCI and non-ADCI/LBCI groups.
听力损失(HL)与认知障碍(CI)潜在机制之间的关联尚不清楚。我们评估了临床因素、血管磁共振成像(MRI)标志物和CI机制对HL的影响。
总共112例患有CI(59%为痴呆患者)和主观HL的患者前瞻性地接受了MRI、淀粉样蛋白正电子发射断层扫描(PET)、听力评估以及包括语言理解测试在内的神经心理学测试。根据临床特征和PET生物标志物,将患者分为纯阿尔茨海默病相关CI(ADCI)、纯路易体病相关CI(LBCI)、混合ADCI/LBCI和非ADCI/LBCI组。
纯LBCI组外周HL(定义为纯音平均(PTA)阈值>40 dB)的风险高于纯ADCI组和混合ADCI/LBCI组,而在存在ADCI时风险较低。非ADCI/LBCI组具有最严重的血管MRI标志物,且外周HL风险高于纯ADCI组和混合ADCI/LBCI组。尽管无论PTA和韩国版简易精神状态检查表(K-MMSE)得分如何,纯LBCI组比纯ADCI组有更高的理解功能障碍风险,但由于PTA较差,纯LBCI组中即使K-MMSE得分较好的患者其理解功能障碍风险与混合ADCI/LBCI组相当。
外周HL可能与CI患者中无显著β淀粉样蛋白沉积相关,且与纯LBCI组和非ADCI/LBCI组的特征有关。