Suppr超能文献

情感和认知是否受文化影响?对全球公共卫生运动的启示:一项横断面研究。

Are need for affect and cognition culture dependent? Implications for global public health campaigns: a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Shanghai Key Laboratory of Clinical Geriatric Medicine, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, 221 West Yan'an Road, Shanghai, China.

Jiuting Community Health Service Center, Shanghai, Songjiang District, China.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 9;21(1):693. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10689-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cultural differences in affective and cognitive intrinsic motivation could pose challenges for global public health campaigns, which use cognitive or affective goals to evoke desired attitudes and proactive health-promoting actions. This study aimed to identify cross-cultural differences in affective and cognitive intrinsic motivation and discuss the potential value of this information for public health promotion.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey using cross-culturally validated need for affect (NFA) and need for cognition (NFC) scales was carried out among 1166 Chinese participants, and the results were compared with published data from 980 American participants. Additionally, we assessed a highly prevalent symbolic geriatric health condition, hearing loss, in 500 Chinese community-dwelling seniors. The Chinese NFA scale was developed following the translation-back translation procedure, and the psychometric evaluation was performed by applying confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM), correlation analysis and multigroup invariance test. MANOVA and Hedge's g statistic were employed to compare the NFA and NFC levels between individuals from different countries and between Chinese seniors with and without hearing loss. The relation of early hearing intervention intention to NFA and NFC was also explored in the Chinese sample.

RESULTS

A basic two-factor model of NFA adequately fit the sample data from Chinese and American cultures. The questionnaire demonstrated reasonable invariance of the factor structure and factor loadings across the groups. Those in the primary Chinese sample had lower NFA and NFC than their American peers. This difference held in the senior sample. Moreover, Chinese seniors with hearing loss had even lower NFA and NFC than those without hearing loss. Their early hearing intervention intention was low but was associated with intrinsic motivation.

CONCLUSIONS

The Need for Affect (NFA) construct may be generalized beyond its Western origins. There was a general lack of affective and cognitive intrinsic motivation in Chinese individuals, particularly in seniors with hearing loss, compared with their American peers. These differences point to a potential challenge in framing effective messages for some cultures in the geriatric public health domain. Ideally, recognizing and understanding this challenge will inspire the consideration of novel persuasive strategies for these audiences.

摘要

背景

情感和认知内在动机的文化差异可能会给使用认知或情感目标来唤起期望态度和积极促进健康行为的全球公共卫生运动带来挑战。本研究旨在确定情感和认知内在动机的跨文化差异,并讨论这些信息对促进公共健康的潜在价值。

方法

使用跨文化验证的情感需求(NFA)和认知需求(NFC)量表对 1166 名中国参与者进行了横断面调查,并将结果与来自 980 名美国参与者的已发表数据进行了比较。此外,我们评估了 500 名中国社区居住的老年人中一种普遍存在的象征性老年健康状况,即听力损失。中国 NFA 量表是按照翻译-回译程序开发的,通过验证性因素分析(CFA)、探索性结构方程建模(ESEM)、相关性分析和多组不变性检验对其进行了心理计量评估。多变量方差分析(MANOVA)和 Hedge 的 g 统计量用于比较来自不同国家的个体之间以及中国有听力损失和无听力损失的老年人之间的 NFA 和 NFC 水平。还在中国样本中探讨了早期听力干预意向与 NFA 和 NFC 的关系。

结果

NFA 的基本两因素模型充分适用于来自中、美文化的样本数据。问卷在不同群体中表现出结构和因子负荷的合理不变性。中国初级样本的 NFA 和 NFC 均低于其美国同龄人。这种差异在老年样本中也存在。此外,有听力损失的中国老年人的 NFA 和 NFC 甚至低于没有听力损失的老年人。他们的早期听力干预意向较低,但与内在动机有关。

结论

情感需求(NFA)结构可能超出其西方起源。与美国同龄人相比,中国个体,特别是有听力损失的老年人,普遍缺乏情感和认知内在动机。这些差异表明,在老年公共卫生领域,为某些文化制定有效的信息可能会面临挑战。理想情况下,认识到并理解这一挑战将激发人们为这些受众考虑新的有说服力的策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/014a/8034077/108560352eba/12889_2021_10689_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验