Suppr超能文献

临终关怀中电子姑息治疗协调系统(EPaCCS)的利用不足:一项横断面研究。

Underutilisation of EPaCCS (Electronic Palliative Care Coordination Systems) in end-of life-care: a cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Pocock Lucy, Morris Richard, French Lydia, Purdy Sarah

机构信息

Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK

Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2021 Apr 9. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002798.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To support greater personalisation of end-of-life care, Electronic Palliative Care Coordination Systems (EPaCCS) have been implemented across England. Here, we describe patient factors associated with dying with an EPaCCS record and explore the association between having an EPaCCS record with cause and place of death.

METHOD

This is a cross-sectional study using routinely collected data. Data were extracted from primary care records in 20 of 86 general practices within one Clinical Commissioning Group in England. All deaths (n=1723) recorded between 22 February 2018 and 21 February 2019 were included to determine whether the deceased patient had an EPaCCS record at the time of death, a range of demographic factors, place of death and cause of death.

RESULTS

Only 18% of the sample died with an EPaCCS record, and people who died of a non-cancer cause were less likely to have an EPaCCS record than those who died of cancer (OR=0.41; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.55). Adjusting for patient demographic factors and cause of death, having an EPaCCS record was strongly associated with dying in the community (OR=5.10; 95% CI 3.70 to 7.03).

CONCLUSIONS

A small proportion of this sample died with an EPaCCS record, despite evidence of an association with dying in the community.

摘要

目的

为支持临终关怀的更大个性化,电子姑息治疗协调系统(EPaCCS)已在英格兰各地实施。在此,我们描述与有EPaCCS记录的死亡相关的患者因素,并探讨有EPaCCS记录与死亡原因和地点之间的关联。

方法

这是一项使用常规收集数据的横断面研究。数据从英格兰一个临床委托小组内86家全科诊所中的20家的初级保健记录中提取。纳入2018年2月22日至2019年2月21日期间记录的所有死亡病例(n = 1723),以确定死者在死亡时是否有EPaCCS记录、一系列人口统计学因素、死亡地点和死亡原因。

结果

样本中只有18%的人死亡时有EPaCCS记录,死于非癌症原因的人比死于癌症的人更不可能有EPaCCS记录(比值比=0.41;95%置信区间0.31至0.55)。在调整患者人口统计学因素和死亡原因后,有EPaCCS记录与在社区死亡密切相关(比值比=5.10;95%置信区间3.70至7.03)。

结论

尽管有证据表明与在社区死亡有关联,但该样本中只有一小部分人死亡时有EPaCCS记录。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验