Seth V, Seth S D, Beotra A, Singh U
Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi.
Dev Pharmacol Ther. 1988;11(1):32-6. doi: 10.1159/000457661.
The acetylator status of 40 children with pulmonary tuberculosis was investigated by (1) sulfadimidine (SDM; sulfamethazine) acetylation test in urine and (2) estimation of isonicotinic acid hydrazide (INH) levels. The antimode was at 70% based on the frequency distribution of SDM acetylation. Children acetylating less than 70% of administered SDM were taken as slow acetylators while those with more than 70% as rapid acetylators. The serum INH antimode was at 0.85 micrograms/ml. Thus serum values less than 0.85 micrograms/ml categorised a child as rapid and those with more than 0.85 micrograms/ml as slow acetylators. The sensitivity of these two methods was similar with a correlation coefficient r = 0.64. Thus the determination of the type of acetylator by SDM acetylation test is equally reliable and technically simpler and is recommended instead of INH serum concentration.
通过以下两种方法对40名肺结核患儿的乙酰化状态进行了研究:(1)尿液中磺胺二甲嘧啶(SDM;磺胺甲基嘧啶)乙酰化试验;(2)异烟肼(INH)水平测定。根据SDM乙酰化的频率分布,反众数为70%。服用的SDM乙酰化少于70%的儿童被视为慢乙酰化者,而乙酰化超过70%的儿童则为快乙酰化者。血清INH的反众数为0.85微克/毫升。因此,血清值低于0.85微克/毫升的儿童被归类为快乙酰化者,而血清值高于0.85微克/毫升的儿童则为慢乙酰化者。这两种方法的敏感性相似,相关系数r = 0.64。因此,通过SDM乙酰化试验确定乙酰化类型同样可靠,且技术上更简单,建议采用该方法替代INH血清浓度测定。