Sydney Institute for Women, Children and their Families, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
BJOG. 2021 Oct;128(11):1833-1842. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16719. Epub 2021 May 19.
To evaluate the discrepancy between historical and more recent descriptions of the first stage of labour by testing whether the statistical techniques used recently (repeated-measures polynomial and interval-censored regression) were appropriate for detection of periods of rapid acceleration of cervical dilatation as might occur at the time of transition from a latent to an active phase of labour.
A simulation study using regression techniques.
We created a simulated data set for 500 000 labours with clearly defined latent and active phases using the parameters described by Friedman. Additionally, we created a data set comprising 500 000 labours with a progressively increasing rate of cervical dilatation.
Repeated-measures polynomial regression was used to create summary labour curves based on simulated cervical examinations. Interval-censored regression was used to create centimetre-by-centimetre estimates of rates of cervical dilatation and their 95th centiles.
Labour summary curves and rates of cervical dilatation.
Repeated-measures polynomial regression did not detect the rapid acceleration in cervical dilatation (i.e. acceleration phase) and overestimated lengths of labour, especially at smaller cervical dilatations. There was a two-fold overestimation in the mean rate of cervical dilatation from 4 to 6 cm. Interval-censored regression overestimated median transit times, at 4- to 5-cm cervical dilatation or when cervical examinations occurred less frequently than 0.5- to 1.5-hourly.
Repeated-measures polynomial regression and interval-censored regression should not be routinely used to define labour progress because they do not accurately reflect the underlying data.
Repeated-measures polynomial and interval-censored regression techniques are not appropriate to model first stage of labour.
通过检验最近使用的统计技术(重复测量多项式和区间 censored 回归)是否适用于检测宫颈扩张快速加速期(可能发生在潜伏期向活跃期过渡时),来评估第一产程的历史描述和近期描述之间的差异。
使用回归技术的模拟研究。
我们使用 Friedman 描述的参数为 50 万次分娩创建了一个具有明确潜伏期和活跃期的模拟数据集。此外,我们还创建了一个包含 50 万次分娩的数据集,这些分娩的宫颈扩张率逐渐增加。
重复测量多项式回归用于根据模拟的宫颈检查创建分娩总结曲线。区间 censored 回归用于创建厘米级别的宫颈扩张率及其 95%百分位数的估计值。
分娩总结曲线和宫颈扩张率。
重复测量多项式回归未能检测到宫颈扩张的快速加速(即加速期),并高估了分娩的长度,尤其是在宫颈扩张较小的情况下。从 4 厘米到 6 厘米,宫颈扩张率的平均估计值高估了两倍。区间 censored 回归高估了 4 厘米至 5 厘米宫颈扩张或宫颈检查频率低于 0.5 小时至 1.5 小时时的中位数转移时间。
重复测量多项式回归和区间 censored 回归不应该常规用于定义分娩进展,因为它们不能准确反映潜在数据。
重复测量多项式和区间 censored 回归技术不适用于建模第一产程。