Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Center of Respiratory Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Sep;40(9):1899-1907. doi: 10.1007/s10096-021-04228-z. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
To explore the diagnostic value of a galactomannan (GM) detection for non-immunocompromised critically ill patients with influenza-associated aspergillosis (IAA). In this retrospective case-control study, we explored the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) GM tests by four detection strategies at different detection time points and with different compound modes. In total, 90 patients were evaluated. The AUC values of the second serum GM test, the first and second BALF GM tests, were significantly higher (0.839 (95% CI 0.716 to 0.963), P < 0.01; 0.904 (95% CI 0.820 to 0.988), P < 0.01; 0.827 (95% CI 0.694 to 0.961), P = 0.043) than that of the first serum GM test (0.548 (95% CI 0.377 to 0.718)). We found that at least one positive result on two consecutive serum GM tests (0.719 (95% CI 0.588 to 0.849)) was the best compared with the first positive test (0.419 (95% CI 0.342 to 0.641), P < 0.01) and positives on two consecutive tests (0.636 (95% CI 0.483 to 0.790), P = 0.014). However, there were no differences between those three detection strategies of BALF GM. The BALF GM test might have a better diagnostic value for IAA in the ICU than the serum GM test. A possible cutoff value of 1.0 to 1.3 was set for GM from BALF specimens for IAA. A single serum GM test is not routinely recommended, but at least one positive result on two consecutive tests appeared to be useful.
探讨半乳甘露聚糖(GM)检测对非免疫抑制危重症流感相关性侵袭性曲霉病(IAA)患者的诊断价值。在这项回顾性病例对照研究中,我们探讨了不同检测时间点和不同组合模式下,4 种检测策略的血清和支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)GM 检测的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)。共评估了 90 例患者。第二次血清 GM 检测、第一次和第二次 BALF GM 检测的 AUC 值显著更高(0.839(95%CI 0.716 至 0.963),P < 0.01;0.904(95%CI 0.820 至 0.988),P < 0.01;0.827(95%CI 0.694 至 0.961),P = 0.043),高于第一次血清 GM 检测(0.548(95%CI 0.377 至 0.718))。我们发现,至少连续两次血清 GM 检测中有一次阳性(0.719(95%CI 0.588 至 0.849))优于第一次阳性检测(0.419(95%CI 0.342 至 0.641),P < 0.01)和连续两次检测阳性(0.636(95%CI 0.483 至 0.790),P = 0.014)。然而,BALF GM 的这三种检测策略之间没有差异。BALF GM 检测对 ICU 中 IAA 的诊断价值可能优于血清 GM 检测。对于 BALF 标本 GM,设定了 1.0 至 1.3 的可能截断值用于 IAA。不常规推荐单次血清 GM 检测,但至少连续两次检测中有一次阳性结果似乎有用。