Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Institute of Medical Virology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Liver Transpl. 2021 Sep;27(9):1283-1290. doi: 10.1002/lt.26068. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
Retransplantation after graft failure is increasingly performed, and inferior graft survival, patient survival, and quality of life has been reported. The role of infectious disease (ID) events in this less favorable outcome is unknown. We analyzed ID events after first liver transplantation (FLTpx) and retransplantation (reLTpx) in the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study. Clinical factors were compared after FLTpx and reLTpx, and survival analysis was applied to compare the time to ID events after FLTpx and after reLTpx, adjusted for age, sex, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, donor type, liver transplant type (whole versus split liver), and duration of transplant surgery. In total, 60 patients were included (65.0% male, median age of 56 years). Overall, 343 ID events were observed: 204 (59.5%) after the FLTpx and 139 (40.5%) after reLTpx. Bacterial infections were most frequent (193/343, 56.3%), followed by viral (43/343, 12.5%) and fungal (28/343, 8.2%) infections, with less infections by Candida spp. but more by Aspergillus spp. after reLTpx (P = 0.01). The most frequent infection site was bloodstream infection (86, 21.3%), followed by liver and biliary tract (83, 20.5%) and intraabdominal (63, 15.6%) infections. After reLTpx, more respiratory tract and surgical site infections were observed (P < 0.001). The time to first infection was shorter after FLTpx (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.5; 95%-confidence interval [CI], 0.3-1.0; P = 0.04). Reduced hazards for ID events after reLTpx were also observed when modelling recurrent events (adjusted HR, 0.5; CI, 0.3-0.8; P = 0.003). The number of infections was comparable after FLTpx and reLTpx; however, differences regarding infection sites and fungal species were observed. Hazards were reduced for infection after reLTpx.
移植失败后再次进行移植的情况越来越多,据报道,移植物存活率、患者存活率和生活质量均有所下降。然而,传染病(ID)事件在这种较差结局中的作用尚不清楚。我们在瑞士移植队列研究中分析了首次肝移植(FLTpx)和再次肝移植(reLTpx)后的 ID 事件。比较了 FLTpx 和 reLTpx 后的临床因素,并应用生存分析比较了 FLTpx 后和 reLTpx 后的 ID 事件时间,调整了年龄、性别、终末期肝病模型评分、供体类型、肝移植类型(全肝与劈裂肝)和移植手术持续时间。共纳入 60 例患者(65.0%为男性,中位年龄为 56 岁)。共有 343 例 ID 事件:204 例(59.5%)发生在 FLTpx 后,139 例(40.5%)发生在 reLTpx 后。细菌性感染最常见(193/343,56.3%),其次是病毒性(43/343,12.5%)和真菌性(28/343,8.2%)感染,reLTpx 后念珠菌感染较少,但曲霉菌感染较多(P=0.01)。最常见的感染部位是血流感染(86 例,21.3%),其次是肝和胆道感染(83 例,20.5%)和腹腔内感染(63 例,15.6%)。reLTpx 后,更多的呼吸道和手术部位感染(P<0.001)。FLTpx 后首次感染的时间更短(校正后的危险比[HR],0.5;95%可信区间[CI],0.3-1.0;P=0.04)。在再发事件模型中,也观察到再 LTpx 后 ID 事件的风险降低(校正 HR,0.5;CI,0.3-0.8;P=0.003)。FLTpx 和 reLTpx 后的感染次数相当;然而,观察到感染部位和真菌种类存在差异。reLTpx 后感染的风险降低。