• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

二十多种基于处方药的风险评分可用于风险调整:系统评价。

More than two-dozen prescription drug-based risk scores are available for risk adjustment: A systematic review.

机构信息

Center for Drug Safety and Effectiveness, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Center for Drug Safety and Effectiveness, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Sep;137:113-125. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.029. Epub 2021 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.029
PMID:33838274
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

While several prescription drug-based risk indices have been developed, their design, performance, and application has not previously been synthesized.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

We searched Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL and Embase from inception through March 3, 2020 and included studies that developed or updated a prescription drug-based risk index. Two reviewers independently performed screening and extracted information on data source, study population, cohort sizes, outcomes, study methodology and performance. Predictive performance was evaluated using C statistics for binary outcomes and R for continuous outcomes. The PROSPERO ID for this review is CRD42020165498.

RESULTS

Of 19,112 articles that were retrieved, 124 were full-text screened and 25 were included, each of which represented a de novo or updated drug-based index. The indices were customized to varied age groups and clinical populations and most commonly evaluated outcomes including mortality (36%), hospitalization (24%) and healthcare costs (24%). C statistics ranged from 0.62 to 0.92 for mortality and 0.59 to 0.72 for hospitalization, while adjusted R for healthcare costs ranged from 0.06 to 0.62. Seven of the 25 risk indices included used global drug classification algorithms.

CONCLUSIONS

More than two-dozen prescription drug-based risk indices have been developed and they differ significantly in design, performance and application.

摘要

目的

虽然已经开发了几种基于处方药物的风险指数,但它们的设计、性能和应用尚未得到综合。

研究设计和设置

我们在 2020 年 3 月 3 日之前在 Ovid MEDLINE、CINAHL 和 Embase 中进行了搜索,并纳入了开发或更新基于处方药物的风险指数的研究。两名审查员独立进行筛选,并提取了有关数据源、研究人群、队列大小、结局、研究方法和性能的信息。使用二分类结局的 C 统计量和连续结局的 R 来评估预测性能。本综述的 PROSPERO ID 为 CRD42020165498。

结果

在检索到的 19112 篇文章中,有 124 篇进行了全文筛选,有 25 篇被纳入,每篇都代表了一种新开发或更新的基于药物的指数。这些指数针对不同的年龄组和临床人群进行了定制,最常用于评估死亡率(36%)、住院率(24%)和医疗保健成本(24%)等结局。死亡率的 C 统计量范围为 0.62 至 0.92,住院率的 C 统计量范围为 0.59 至 0.72,而医疗保健成本的调整 R 范围为 0.06 至 0.62。25 个风险指数中有 7 个使用了全球药物分类算法。

结论

已经开发了二十多种基于处方药物的风险指数,它们在设计、性能和应用方面存在显著差异。

相似文献

1
More than two-dozen prescription drug-based risk scores are available for risk adjustment: A systematic review.二十多种基于处方药的风险评分可用于风险调整:系统评价。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Sep;137:113-125. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.029. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Measurement properties of comorbidity indices in maternal health research: a systematic review.在孕产妇健康研究中,合并症指数的测量特性:系统评价。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Nov 13;17(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1558-3.
4
Health outcomes associated with illicit prescription opioid injection: A systematic review.与非法注射处方阿片类药物相关的健康后果:一项系统评价。
J Addict Dis. 2016;35(2):73-91. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2015.1127712. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
5
A systematic review identifies valid comorbidity indices derived from administrative health data.一项系统评价从行政健康数据中确定了有效的合并症指数。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Jan;68(1):3-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.09.010. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
6
Concurrent use of prescription drugs and herbal medicinal products in older adults: a systematic review protocol.老年人同时使用处方药和草药产品:一项系统评价方案
Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 21;5:65. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0244-2.
7
A narrative review of using prescription drug databases for comorbidity adjustment: A less effective remedy or a prescription for improved model fit?使用处方药数据库进行共病调整的叙述性综述:一种效果较差的补救措施还是改善模型拟合的良方?
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 Feb;18(2):2283-2300. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.06.016. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
8
9
10
A Systematic Review of Case-Identification Algorithms Based on Italian Healthcare Administrative Databases for Two Relevant Diseases of the Endocrine System: Diabetes Mellitus and Thyroid Disorders.基于意大利医疗行政数据库对内分泌系统两种相关疾病(糖尿病和甲状腺疾病)的病例识别算法的系统评价。
Epidemiol Prev. 2019 Jul-Aug;43(4 Suppl 2):17-36. doi: 10.19191/EP19.4.S2.P008.089.

引用本文的文献

1
A head-to-head comparison of the validity and predictive ability for health outcomes of diagnosis versus medication-based comorbidity indices.基于诊断与药物治疗的共病指数对健康结局的有效性和预测能力的直接比较。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2025 May 27;37(1):172. doi: 10.1007/s40520-025-03073-w.
2
Clinical Utility of Medication-Based Risk Scores to Reduce Polypharmacy and Potentially Avoidable Healthcare Utilization.基于药物的风险评分在减少多重用药及潜在可避免的医疗保健利用方面的临床效用。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022 May 28;15(6):681. doi: 10.3390/ph15060681.
3
Evaluating Drug Risk Using GAN and SMOTE Based on CFDA's Spontaneous Reporting Data.
基于 CFDA 自发报告数据的使用 GAN 和 SMOTE 的药物风险评估。
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Aug 27;2021:6033860. doi: 10.1155/2021/6033860. eCollection 2021.