Suppr超能文献

十二指肠胃肠道间质瘤行局限性切除术还是胰十二指肠切除术?剜除术影响争论:一项欧洲多中心回顾性队列研究。

Limited Resection Versus Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Duodenal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors? Enucleation Interferes in the Debate: A European Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

机构信息

Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, University Lille, Claude Huriez University Hospital, CHU de Lille, Lille, France.

University Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS : Évaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, Lille, France.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Oct;28(11):6294-6306. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09862-7. Epub 2021 Apr 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal surgical procedure for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (D-GISTs) remains poorly defined. Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) allows for a wide resection but is associated with a high morbidity rate.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of PD versus limited resection (LR) for D-GISTs and to evaluate the role of tumor enucleation (EN).

METHODS

In this retrospective European multicenter cohort study, 100 patients who underwent resection for D-GIST between 2001 and 2013 were compared between PD (n = 19) and LR (n = 81). LR included segmental duodenectomy (n = 47), wedge resection (n = 21), or EN (n = 13). The primary objective was to evaluate disease-free survival (DFS) between the groups, while the secondary objectives were to analyze the overall morbidity and mortality, radicality of resection, and 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence rates between groups. Furthermore, the short- and long-term outcomes of EN were evaluated.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were comparable between the PD and LR groups, except for a more frequent D2 tumor location in the PD group (68.3% vs. 29.6%; p = 0.016). Postoperative morbidity was higher after PD (68.4% vs. 23.5%; p < 0.001). OS (p = 0.70) and DFS (p = 0.64) were comparable after adjustment for D2 location and adjuvant therapy rate. EN was performed more in American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) stage III/IV patients with tumors < 5 cm and was associated with a 5-year OS rate of 84.6%, without any disease recurrences.

CONCLUSIONS

For D-GISTs, LR should be the procedure of choice due to lower morbidity and similar oncological outcomes compared with PD. In selected patients, EN appears to be associated with equivalent short- and long-term outcomes. Based on these results, a surgical treatment algorithm is proposed.

摘要

背景

十二指肠胃肠道间质瘤(D-GIST)的最佳手术方法仍未明确。胰十二指肠切除术(PD)允许广泛切除,但与高发病率相关。

目的

本研究旨在比较 PD 与有限切除术(LR)治疗 D-GIST 的短期和长期结果,并评估肿瘤剜除术(EN)的作用。

方法

在这项回顾性的欧洲多中心队列研究中,比较了 2001 年至 2013 年间接受 D-GIST 切除术的 100 例患者,分为 PD(n=19)和 LR(n=81)两组。LR 包括节段性十二指肠切除术(n=47)、楔形切除术(n=21)或 EN(n=13)。主要目的是评估两组之间的无疾病生存率(DFS),次要目的是分析总发病率和死亡率、切除的根治性以及两组之间的 5 年总生存率(OS)和复发率。此外,还评估了 EN 的短期和长期结果。

结果

除 PD 组更常见 D2 肿瘤位置(68.3% vs. 29.6%;p=0.016)外,PD 和 LR 两组的基线特征相当。PD 组术后发病率较高(68.4% vs. 23.5%;p<0.001)。调整 D2 位置和辅助治疗率后,OS(p=0.70)和 DFS(p=0.64)无差异。EN 主要用于 ASA 分级 III/IV 期和肿瘤<5cm 的患者,5 年 OS 率为 84.6%,无疾病复发。

结论

对于 D-GIST,LR 应作为首选方法,因为与 PD 相比,LR 的发病率较低,且肿瘤学结果相似。在选择的患者中,EN 似乎与等效的短期和长期结果相关。基于这些结果,提出了一种手术治疗方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验