• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用人工智能赋能显微镜提高 Ki67 评估一致性:一项多机构环研究。

Improving Ki67 assessment concordance by the use of an artificial intelligence-empowered microscope: a multi-institutional ring study.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.

AI Lab, Tencent, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Histopathology. 2021 Oct;79(4):544-555. doi: 10.1111/his.14383. Epub 2021 Jun 24.

DOI:10.1111/his.14383
PMID:33840132
Abstract

AIMS

The nuclear proliferation biomarker Ki67 plays potential prognostic and predictive roles in breast cancer treatment. However, the lack of interpathologist consistency in Ki67 assessment limits the clinical use of Ki67. The aim of this article was to report a solution utilising an artificial intelligence (AI)-empowered microscope to improve Ki67 scoring concordance.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We developed an AI-empowered microscope in which the conventional microscope was equipped with AI algorithms, and AI results were provided to pathologists in real time through augmented reality. We recruited 30 pathologists with various experience levels from five institutes to assess the Ki67 labelling index on 100 Ki67-stained slides from invasive breast cancer patients. In the first round, pathologists conducted visual assessment on a conventional microscope; in the second round, they were assisted with reference cards; and in the third round, they were assisted with an AI-empowered microscope. Experienced pathologists had better reproducibility and accuracy [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.864, mean error = 8.25%] than inexperienced pathologists (ICC = 0.807, mean error = 11.0%) in visual assessment. Moreover, with reference cards, inexperienced pathologists (ICC = 0.836, mean error = 10.7%) and experienced pathologists (ICC = 0.875, mean error = 7.56%) improved their reproducibility and accuracy. Finally, both experienced pathologists (ICC = 0.937, mean error = 4.36%) and inexperienced pathologists (ICC = 0.923, mean error = 4.71%) improved the reproducibility and accuracy significantly with the AI-empowered microscope.

CONCLUSION

The AI-empowered microscope allows seamless integration of the AI solution into the clinical workflow, and helps pathologists to obtain higher consistency and accuracy for Ki67 assessment.

摘要

目的

核增殖标志物 Ki67 在乳腺癌治疗中具有潜在的预后和预测作用。然而,Ki67 评估中缺乏病理学家间的一致性限制了 Ki67 的临床应用。本文旨在报告一种利用人工智能(AI)赋能显微镜提高 Ki67 评分一致性的解决方案。

方法和结果

我们开发了一种 AI 赋能显微镜,在传统显微镜上配备了 AI 算法,并通过增强现实实时向病理学家提供 AI 结果。我们从五家机构招募了 30 名具有不同经验水平的病理学家,对 100 例浸润性乳腺癌患者的 Ki67 染色切片进行 Ki67 标记指数评估。在第一轮中,病理学家在传统显微镜下进行视觉评估;在第二轮中,他们使用参考卡进行辅助;在第三轮中,他们使用 AI 赋能显微镜进行辅助。有经验的病理学家比无经验的病理学家(ICC=0.807,平均误差=11.0%)具有更好的可重复性和准确性(ICC=0.864,平均误差=8.25%)在视觉评估中。此外,使用参考卡后,无经验的病理学家(ICC=0.836,平均误差=10.7%)和有经验的病理学家(ICC=0.875,平均误差=7.56%)提高了他们的可重复性和准确性。最后,有经验的病理学家(ICC=0.937,平均误差=4.36%)和无经验的病理学家(ICC=0.923,平均误差=4.71%)都通过 AI 赋能显微镜显著提高了可重复性和准确性。

结论

AI 赋能显微镜允许将 AI 解决方案无缝集成到临床工作流程中,帮助病理学家获得更高的 Ki67 评估一致性和准确性。

相似文献

1
Improving Ki67 assessment concordance by the use of an artificial intelligence-empowered microscope: a multi-institutional ring study.利用人工智能赋能显微镜提高 Ki67 评估一致性:一项多机构环研究。
Histopathology. 2021 Oct;79(4):544-555. doi: 10.1111/his.14383. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
2
Can AI-assisted microscope facilitate breast HER2 interpretation? A multi-institutional ring study.人工智能辅助显微镜是否有助于乳腺癌 HER2 判读?一项多机构环研究。
Virchows Arch. 2021 Sep;479(3):443-449. doi: 10.1007/s00428-021-03154-x. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
3
Artificial intelligence-assisted interpretation of Ki-67 expression and repeatability in breast cancer.人工智能辅助解读乳腺癌 Ki-67 表达及其重复性。
Diagn Pathol. 2022 Jan 30;17(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13000-022-01196-6.
4
An interobserver reproducibility analysis of size-set semiautomatic counting for Ki67 assessment in breast cancer.乳腺癌中 Ki67 评估的大小设定半自动计数的观察者间可重复性分析。
Breast. 2020 Feb;49:225-232. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.12.009. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
5
Artificial intelligence enhances whole-slide interpretation of PD-L1 CPS in triple-negative breast cancer: A multi-institutional ring study.人工智能增强三阴性乳腺癌中程序性死亡受体配体1综合阳性评分的全切片解读:一项多机构环形研究
Histopathology. 2024 Sep;85(3):451-467. doi: 10.1111/his.15205. Epub 2024 May 15.
6
The human-in-the-loop: an evaluation of pathologists' interaction with artificial intelligence in clinical practice.人在回路中:临床实践中病理学家与人工智能互动的评估
Histopathology. 2021 Aug;79(2):210-218. doi: 10.1111/his.14356. Epub 2021 May 30.
7
Analytical validation of a standardised scoring protocol for Ki67 immunohistochemistry on breast cancer excision whole sections: an international multicentre collaboration.Ki67 免疫组化在乳腺癌全切除标本中的标准化评分方案的分析验证:一项国际多中心合作。
Histopathology. 2019 Aug;75(2):225-235. doi: 10.1111/his.13880. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
8
Interobserver concordance of Ki67 labeling index in breast cancer: Japan Breast Cancer Research Group Ki67 ring study.乳腺癌中 Ki67 标记指数的观察者间一致性:日本乳腺癌研究组 Ki67 环研究。
Cancer Sci. 2013 Nov;104(11):1539-43. doi: 10.1111/cas.12245. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
9
[Application Test of the AI-Automatic Diagnostic System for Ki-67 in Breast Cancer].[人工智能辅助乳腺癌Ki-67自动诊断系统的应用测试]
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2021 Jul;52(4):693-697. doi: 10.12182/20210460202.
10
An international Ki67 reproducibility study.一项国际 Ki67 可重复性研究。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Dec 18;105(24):1897-906. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt306. Epub 2013 Nov 7.

引用本文的文献

1
AI microscope facilitates accurate interpretation of HER2 immunohistochemical scores 0 and 1+ in invasive breast cancer.人工智能显微镜有助于准确解读浸润性乳腺癌中HER2免疫组化评分为0和1+的情况。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 11;15(1):29289. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13820-8.
2
Evaluating the Impact of a Ki-67 Decision Support Algorithm on Pathology Residents' Scoring Accuracy.评估Ki-67决策支持算法对病理学住院医师评分准确性的影响。
J Imaging Inform Med. 2025 Apr 3. doi: 10.1007/s10278-025-01490-x.
3
Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: current development, challenges, and clinical perspectives.
胃肠胰神经内分泌肿瘤:当前的发展、挑战和临床观点。
Mil Med Res. 2024 Jun 4;11(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s40779-024-00535-6.
4
Association Between Ki-67 Proliferative Index and Oncotype-Dx Recurrence Score in Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Early Breast Cancers. A Systematic Review of the Literature.激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子受体2阴性早期乳腺癌中Ki-67增殖指数与Oncotype-Dx复发评分之间的关联:文献系统综述
Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2024 May 20;18:11782234241255211. doi: 10.1177/11782234241255211. eCollection 2024.
5
AI improves accuracy, agreement and efficiency of pathologists for Ki67 assessments in breast cancer.人工智能提高了病理学家在乳腺癌 Ki67 评估中的准确性、一致性和效率。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 13;14(1):1283. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51723-2.
6
AI-Powered Segmentation of Invasive Carcinoma Regions in Breast Cancer Immunohistochemical Whole-Slide Images.人工智能辅助分割乳腺癌免疫组化全切片图像中的浸润癌区域
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Dec 29;16(1):167. doi: 10.3390/cancers16010167.
7
Biological insights and novel biomarker discovery through deep learning approaches in breast cancer histopathology.通过深度学习方法在乳腺癌组织病理学中获得生物学见解和发现新型生物标志物
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2023 Apr 6;9(1):21. doi: 10.1038/s41523-023-00518-1.
8
A scoping review of deep learning in cancer nursing combined with augmented reality: The era of intelligent nursing is coming.深度学习在癌症护理中结合增强现实的范围综述:智能护理时代即将来临。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2022 Sep 6;9(12):100135. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2022.100135. eCollection 2022 Dec.
9
Deep learning-based single-shot autofocus method for digital microscopy.基于深度学习的数字显微镜单次自动对焦方法
Biomed Opt Express. 2021 Dec 14;13(1):314-327. doi: 10.1364/BOE.446928. eCollection 2022 Jan 1.
10
: A Novel Prognostic Marker in Canine Melanoma and a Predictive Marker for Resistance to CDK4/6 Inhibitor Treatment.犬黑色素瘤中的一种新型预后标志物及对CDK4/6抑制剂治疗耐药的预测标志物。
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Aug 16;8:705359. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.705359. eCollection 2021.