• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能增强三阴性乳腺癌中程序性死亡受体配体1综合阳性评分的全切片解读:一项多机构环形研究

Artificial intelligence enhances whole-slide interpretation of PD-L1 CPS in triple-negative breast cancer: A multi-institutional ring study.

作者信息

Li Jinze, Dong Pei, Wang Xinran, Zhang Jun, Zhao Meng, Shen Haocheng, Cai Lijing, He Jiankun, Han Mengxue, Miao Jiaxian, Liu Hongbo, Yang Wei, Han Xiao, Liu Yueping

机构信息

Department of Pathology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.

AI Lab, Tencent, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Histopathology. 2024 Sep;85(3):451-467. doi: 10.1111/his.15205. Epub 2024 May 15.

DOI:10.1111/his.15205
PMID:38747491
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Evaluation of the programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) is vital to predict the efficacy of the immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), but pathologists show substantial variability in the consistency and accuracy of the interpretation. It is of great importance to establish an objective and effective method which is highly repeatable.

METHODS

We proposed a model in a deep learning-based framework, which at the patch level incorporated cell analysis and tissue region analysis, followed by the whole-slide level fusion of patch results. Three rounds of ring studies (RSs) were conducted. Twenty-one pathologists of different levels from four institutions evaluated the PD-L1 CPS in TNBC specimens as continuous scores by visual assessment and our artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted method.

RESULTS

In the visual assessment, the interpretation results of PD-L1 (Dako 22C3) CPS by different levels of pathologists have significant differences and showed weak consistency. Using AI-assisted interpretation, there were no significant differences between all pathologists (P = 0.43), and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) value was increased from 0.618 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.524-0.719] to 0.931 (95% CI = 0.902-0.955). The accuracy of interpretation result is further improved to 0.919 (95% CI = 0.886-0.947). Acceptance of AI results by junior pathologists was the highest among all levels, and 80% of the AI results were accepted overall.

CONCLUSION

With the help of the AI-assisted diagnostic method, different levels of pathologists achieved excellent consistency and repeatability in the interpretation of PD-L1 (Dako 22C3) CPS. Our AI-assisted diagnostic approach was proved to strengthen the consistency and repeatability in clinical practice.

摘要

背景与目的

评估程序性细胞死亡配体1(PD-L1)联合阳性评分(CPS)对于预测三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)免疫治疗的疗效至关重要,但病理学家在解读的一致性和准确性方面存在很大差异。建立一种客观、有效且具有高度可重复性的方法非常重要。

方法

我们在基于深度学习的框架中提出了一个模型,该模型在斑块水平纳入细胞分析和组织区域分析,然后在整张切片水平融合斑块结果。进行了三轮环式研究(RSs)。来自四个机构的21名不同水平的病理学家通过视觉评估和我们的人工智能(AI)辅助方法将TNBC标本中的PD-L1 CPS评估为连续分数。

结果

在视觉评估中,不同水平的病理学家对PD-L1(Dako 22C3)CPS的解读结果存在显著差异,一致性较弱。使用AI辅助解读时,所有病理学家之间无显著差异(P = 0.43),组内相关系数(ICC)值从0.618[95%置信区间(CI)= 0.524 - 0.719]提高到0.931(95% CI = 0.902 - 0.955)。解读结果的准确性进一步提高到0.919(95% CI = 0.886 - 0.947)。初级病理学家对AI结果的接受度在所有水平中最高,总体上80%的AI结果被接受。

结论

借助AI辅助诊断方法,不同水平的病理学家在PD-L1(Dako 22C3)CPS的解读中实现了出色的一致性和可重复性。我们的AI辅助诊断方法被证明可加强临床实践中的一致性和可重复性。

相似文献

1
Artificial intelligence enhances whole-slide interpretation of PD-L1 CPS in triple-negative breast cancer: A multi-institutional ring study.人工智能增强三阴性乳腺癌中程序性死亡受体配体1综合阳性评分的全切片解读:一项多机构环形研究
Histopathology. 2024 Sep;85(3):451-467. doi: 10.1111/his.15205. Epub 2024 May 15.
2
An artificial intelligence-powered PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) analyser in urothelial carcinoma alleviating interobserver and intersite variability.人工智能驱动的 PD-L1 联合阳性评分(CPS)分析在尿路上皮癌中减轻观察者间和站点间的变异性。
Histopathology. 2024 Jul;85(1):81-91. doi: 10.1111/his.15176. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
3
Interassay and interobserver comparability study of four programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry assays in triple-negative breast cancer.四种程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)免疫组织化学检测方法在三阴性乳腺癌中的检测结果的批内和批间及观察者间可比性研究。
Breast. 2021 Dec;60:238-244. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.11.003. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
4
PD-L1 testing in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: Interobserver and interplatform reproducibility of CE-IVD assays for CPS and IC scores.转移性三阴性乳腺癌中的 PD-L1 检测:CE-IVD 检测 CPS 和 IC 评分的观察者间和平台间可重复性。
Hum Pathol. 2024 Feb;144:22-27. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2024.01.008. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
5
Artificial intelligence-assisted system for precision diagnosis of PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer.人工智能辅助系统用于非小细胞肺癌中 PD-L1 表达的精准诊断。
Mod Pathol. 2022 Mar;35(3):403-411. doi: 10.1038/s41379-021-00904-9. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
6
Variable Landscape of PD-L1 Expression in Breast Carcinoma as Detected by the DAKO 22C3 Immunohistochemistry Assay.PD-L1 表达在乳腺癌中的可变景观,如 DAKO 22C3 免疫组织化学检测法所检测。
Oncologist. 2023 Apr 6;28(4):319-326. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad025.
7
Comparison of three FDA-approved diagnostic immunohistochemistry assays of PD-L1 in triple-negative breast carcinoma.三种美国食品药品监督管理局批准的 PD-L1 诊断免疫组织化学检测方法在三阴性乳腺癌中的比较。
Hum Pathol. 2021 Feb;108:42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2020.11.004. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
8
Comparison of assessment of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status in triple-negative breast cancer biopsies and surgical specimens.比较程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)在三阴性乳腺癌活检和手术标本中的评估。
J Clin Pathol. 2024 Mar 20;77(4):239-245. doi: 10.1136/jcp-2022-208637.
9
A Deep Learning-Based Assay for Programmed Death Ligand 1 Immunohistochemistry Scoring in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma: Does it Help Pathologists Score?基于深度学习的非小细胞肺癌程序性死亡配体 1 免疫组织化学评分检测法:它能帮助病理学家评分吗?
Mod Pathol. 2024 Jun;37(6):100485. doi: 10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100485. Epub 2024 Apr 6.
10
Scoring PD-L1 Expression in Urothelial Carcinoma: An International Multi-Institutional Study on Comparison of Manual and Artificial Intelligence Measurement Model (AIM-PD-L1) Pathology Assessments.在尿路上皮癌中评分 PD-L1 表达:一项关于手动和人工智能测量模型(AIM-PD-L1)病理评估比较的国际多机构研究。
Virchows Arch. 2024 Apr;484(4):597-608. doi: 10.1007/s00428-024-03795-8. Epub 2024 Apr 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Automated interpretation of PD-L1 CPS based on multi-AI models integration strategy in gastric cancer.基于多人工智能模型整合策略的胃癌中程序性死亡配体1综合阳性评分的自动解读
Front Immunol. 2025 Aug 6;16:1614099. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1614099. eCollection 2025.
2
Immunotherapy in breast cancer: current landscape and emerging trends.乳腺癌的免疫治疗:现状与新趋势
Exp Hematol Oncol. 2025 May 22;14(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s40164-025-00667-y.
3
Advances in Breast Cancer Care: The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Pathology in Precision Medicine.
乳腺癌护理的进展:人工智能和数字病理学在精准医学中的作用。
Eur J Breast Health. 2025 Mar 25;21(2):93-100. doi: 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2025.2024-12-8. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
4
Artificial Intelligence and Breast Cancer Management: From Data to the Clinic.人工智能与乳腺癌管理:从数据到临床
Cancer Innov. 2025 Feb 20;4(2):e159. doi: 10.1002/cai2.159. eCollection 2025 Apr.