• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同电刺激电流和相位持续时间对亚最大和最大扭矩、效率和不适的影响:一项随机交叉试验。

Effects of different electrical stimulation currents and phase durations on submaximal and maximum torque, efficiency, and discomfort: a randomized crossover trial.

机构信息

Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brazil.

Graduate Program of Sciences and Technology of Health, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz J Phys Ther. 2021 Sep-Oct;25(5):593-600. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2021.03.001. Epub 2021 Mar 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.bjpt.2021.03.001
PMID:33840592
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8536851/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is an important therapeutic tool for rehabilitation. However, best stimulation parameters remain to be determined.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the influence of different electrical stimulation currents and phase durations on torque, efficiency, and discomfort.

METHODS

Using a cross-over design, kHz frequency alternating currents (KFAC) and pulsed currents (PC) with narrow (200 µs) or wide (500 µs) phase durations were randomly applied on knee extensor muscles of healthy participants with a minimum of seven days between sessions. The NMES-evoked torque, NMES-efficiency, and discomfort (visual 0-10 cm analogue scale) were measured for each stimulation intensity increments (10 mA). Statistics were conducted using a three-way analysis of variances (phase duration x current x intensity), followed by Tukey post-hoc.

RESULTS

Twenty-four males (age 22.3 ± 3.5years) were included. No effect of NMES current was observed for torque, efficiency, and discomfort. For wide phase durations (500 µs), torque significantly increased for all stimulation intensities. For narrow phase durations (200 µs) evoked torque significantly increased only after 40% of maximal stimulation intensity. Phase durations of 500 µs produced greater torque than 200 µs. Discomfort was greater with 500 µs when compared to 200 µs. Submaximal relative torque, for example 40% of maximum voluntary contraction (MVC), was obtained with ∼ 60% and ∼ 80% of the maximal current intensity for 500 µs and 200 µs, respectively.

CONCLUSION

KFAC and PC current applied with the same phase duration induced similar relative submaximal and maximum evoked-torque, efficiency, and perceived discomfort. However, currents with 500 µs induced higher evoked-torque, current efficiency, and perceived discomfort.

摘要

背景

神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)是康复的重要治疗工具。然而,最佳刺激参数仍有待确定。

目的

确定不同电刺激电流和相位持续时间对扭矩、效率和不适的影响。

方法

使用交叉设计,在健康参与者的膝关节伸肌上随机应用 kHz 频率交流电(KFAC)和脉冲电流(PC),相位持续时间分别为窄(200µs)或宽(500µs),两次治疗之间至少间隔 7 天。对于每个刺激强度增量(10mA),测量 NMES 诱发的扭矩、NMES 效率和不适(视觉 0-10cm 模拟量表)。使用三向方差分析(相位持续时间 x 电流 x 强度)进行统计学分析,然后进行 Tukey 事后检验。

结果

共纳入 24 名男性(年龄 22.3±3.5 岁)。NMES 电流对扭矩、效率和不适均无影响。对于宽相位持续时间(500µs),所有刺激强度的扭矩均显著增加。对于窄相位持续时间(200µs),仅在 40%最大刺激强度后,诱发扭矩才显著增加。500µs 的相位持续时间产生的扭矩大于 200µs。与 200µs 相比,500µs 时的不适感更大。例如,对于 40%的最大自主收缩(MVC)的相对亚最大扭矩,500µs 和 200µs 分别需要约 60%和 80%的最大电流强度。

结论

应用相同相位持续时间的 KFAC 和 PC 电流会引起相似的相对亚最大和最大诱发扭矩、效率和感知不适。然而,500µs 的电流会引起更高的诱发扭矩、电流效率和感知不适。

相似文献

1
Effects of different electrical stimulation currents and phase durations on submaximal and maximum torque, efficiency, and discomfort: a randomized crossover trial.不同电刺激电流和相位持续时间对亚最大和最大扭矩、效率和不适的影响:一项随机交叉试验。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2021 Sep-Oct;25(5):593-600. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2021.03.001. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
2
Kilohertz Frequency Alternating Current Induces Less Evoked Torque and Less Neuromuscular Efficiency Than Pulsed Current in Healthy People: A Randomized Crossover Trial.千赫兹交流电在健康人群中引起的诱发扭矩和神经肌肉效率低于脉冲电流:一项随机交叉试验。
J Sport Rehabil. 2023 Feb 22;32(5):540-548. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2022-0159. Print 2023 Jul 1.
3
Alternating Current Is More Fatigable Than Pulsed Current in People Who Are Healthy: A Double-Blind, Randomized Crossover Trial.健康人群中交流电比脉冲电流更易疲劳:一项双盲、随机交叉试验。
Phys Ther. 2021 Jun 1;101(6). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab056.
4
Comparison between the effects of 4 different electrical stimulation current waveforms on isometric knee extension torque and perceived discomfort in healthy women.4种不同电刺激电流波形对健康女性等长膝关节伸展扭矩和感知不适影响的比较。
Muscle Nerve. 2015 Jan;51(1):76-82. doi: 10.1002/mus.24280.
5
Kilohertz and Low-Frequency Electrical Stimulation With the Same Pulse Duration Have Similar Efficiency for Inducing Isometric Knee Extension Torque and Discomfort.具有相同脉冲持续时间的千赫兹和低频电刺激在诱发等长膝关节伸展扭矩和不适感方面具有相似的效率。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Jun;96(6):388-394. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000631.
6
Influence of kilohertz frequency, burst duty cycle and burst duration on evoked torque, discomfort and muscle efficiency: A randomized crossover trial.千赫兹频率、脉冲占空比和脉冲持续时间对诱发扭矩、不适和肌肉效率的影响:一项随机交叉试验。
Physiol Rep. 2024 Oct;12(20):e70039. doi: 10.14814/phy2.70039.
7
Skinfold thickness affects the isometric knee extension torque evoked by Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation.皮褶厚度会影响神经肌肉电刺激引起的等长膝关节伸展扭矩。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2015 Nov-Dec;19(6):466-72. doi: 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0114. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
8
Current evidence demonstrates similar effects of kilohertz-frequency and low-frequency current on quadriceps evoked torque and discomfort in healthy individuals: a systematic review with meta-analysis.当前证据表明,千赫兹频率电流和低频电流对健康个体股四头肌诱发扭矩和不适感的影响相似:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2015;31(8):533-9. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2015.1064191. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
9
Knee extensor force production and discomfort during neuromuscular electrical stimulation of quadriceps with and without gluteal muscle co-stimulation.股四头肌神经肌肉电刺激时结合和不结合臀肌共同刺激对膝关节伸肌力量产生和不适的影响。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2022 Jun;122(6):1521-1530. doi: 10.1007/s00421-022-04949-9. Epub 2022 Apr 15.
10
Effect of muscle length on maximum evoked torque, discomfort, contraction fatigue, and strength adaptations during electrical stimulation in adult populations: A systematic review.肌肉长度对成年人群在电刺激过程中最大诱发扭矩、不适、收缩疲劳和力量适应的影响:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 10;19(6):e0304205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304205. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of kilohertz versus low-frequency electrical stimulation of the wrist extensors in patients after stroke: A randomized crossover trial.中风后患者中,千赫兹与低频电刺激腕伸肌的效果比较:一项随机交叉试验。
PM R. 2025 Sep;17(9):1055-1068. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.13368. Epub 2025 May 13.
2
Influence of kilohertz frequency, burst duty cycle and burst duration on evoked torque, discomfort and muscle efficiency: A randomized crossover trial.千赫兹频率、脉冲占空比和脉冲持续时间对诱发扭矩、不适和肌肉效率的影响:一项随机交叉试验。
Physiol Rep. 2024 Oct;12(20):e70039. doi: 10.14814/phy2.70039.
3
Stair-Climbing Training with Interferential Electrotherapy Improves Knee Muscle Strength, Dynamic Postural Stability, Pain Score, and Physical Activity in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis.干扰电疗法辅助爬楼梯训练可改善膝骨关节炎患者的膝关节肌肉力量、动态姿势稳定性、疼痛评分及身体活动能力。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Sep 17;14(18):2060. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14182060.
4
Muscular Adaptations Between Very Low Load Resistance Training With Pulsed Direct Current Stimulation (Neubie) and Traditional High Load Training.超低负荷阻力训练结合脉冲直流电刺激(Neubie)与传统高负荷训练的肌肉适应性比较。
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2023 Dec 1;23(4):377-385.
5
Electrical stimulation therapy for peripheral nerve injury.周围神经损伤的电刺激疗法
Front Neurol. 2023 Feb 24;14:1081458. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1081458. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Low-Frequency Pulsed Current Versus Kilohertz-Frequency Alternating Current: A Scoping Literature Review.低频脉冲电流与千赫兹交流电:范围界定文献综述。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Apr;99(4):792-805. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.12.001. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
2
Kilohertz and Low-Frequency Electrical Stimulation With the Same Pulse Duration Have Similar Efficiency for Inducing Isometric Knee Extension Torque and Discomfort.具有相同脉冲持续时间的千赫兹和低频电刺激在诱发等长膝关节伸展扭矩和不适感方面具有相似的效率。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Jun;96(6):388-394. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000631.
3
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation to improve exercise capacity in patients with severe COPD: a randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.神经肌肉电刺激改善重度 COPD 患者运动能力的随机双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Jan;4(1):27-36. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00503-2. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
4
Electrically Elicited Muscle Torque: Comparison Between 2500-Hz Burst-Modulated Alternating Current and Monophasic Pulsed Current.电刺激诱发的肌肉扭矩:2500Hz 爆发调制交流电流与单相脉冲电流的比较。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015 Dec;45(12):1035-41. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2015.5861. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
5
Current evidence demonstrates similar effects of kilohertz-frequency and low-frequency current on quadriceps evoked torque and discomfort in healthy individuals: a systematic review with meta-analysis.当前证据表明,千赫兹频率电流和低频电流对健康个体股四头肌诱发扭矩和不适感的影响相似:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2015;31(8):533-9. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2015.1064191. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
6
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation prevents muscle wasting in critically ill comatose patients.神经肌肉电刺激可预防重症昏迷患者的肌肉萎缩。
Clin Sci (Lond). 2015 Mar;128(6):357-65. doi: 10.1042/CS20140447.
7
Comparison between the effects of 4 different electrical stimulation current waveforms on isometric knee extension torque and perceived discomfort in healthy women.4种不同电刺激电流波形对健康女性等长膝关节伸展扭矩和感知不适影响的比较。
Muscle Nerve. 2015 Jan;51(1):76-82. doi: 10.1002/mus.24280.
8
Comparison of torque and discomfort produced by sinusoidal and rectangular alternating current electrical stimulation in the quadriceps muscle at variable burst duty cycles.在不同的爆发占空比下,比较正弦波和矩形波交流电刺激股四头肌时产生的扭矩和不适感。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Feb;93(2):146-59. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000008.
9
Muscle force production with low and medium frequency burst modulated biphasic pulsed currents.低频和中频猝发调制双相脉冲电流作用下的肌肉力量产生
Physiother Theory Pract. 2014 Feb;30(2):105-9. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2013.823582. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
10
Phosphocreatine resynthesis during recovery in different muscles of the exercising leg by 31P-MRS.通过 31P-MRS 研究运动腿部不同肌肉在恢复期的磷酸肌酸再合成。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013 Oct;23(5):e313-9. doi: 10.1111/sms.12081. Epub 2013 May 13.