• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单中心回顾腹腔神经丛/后路内脏神经丛阻滞治疗非癌症相关疼痛。

Single-Center Review of Celiac Plexus/Retrocrural Splanchnic Nerve Block for Non-Cancer Related Pain.

机构信息

Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, 85259.

Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 5779 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054.

出版信息

Acad Radiol. 2021 Nov;28 Suppl 1:S244-S249. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.03.005. Epub 2021 Apr 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2021.03.005
PMID:33840601
Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Celiac plexus and retrocrural splanchnic nerve (CP/RSN) blocks are widely used for cancer-related abdominal pain, but there is limited literature on their efficacy for non-cancer related pain. Our aim was to determine the indications and effectiveness of CT-guided CP/RSN blocks performed on patients with abdominal pain from non-cancer related sources.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CT-guided CP/RSN blocks for non-cancer related abdominal pain from 2011-2020 were retrospectively reviewed for patient demographics, procedure details, duration of pain relief, and complications. Effective blocks were defined as patient-reported pain relief or decrease in opioid use lasting 2 or more days for temporary blocks and 14 or more days for permanent blocks.

RESULTS

Of 72 CT-guided CP/RSN blocks for non-cancer related abdominal pain, 48 (67%) were effective for a mean of 51 days (median 14, range 2-700). Of the 18 permanent blocks, 9 (50%) were effective for a mean of 111 days (median 90, range 14-390). Of the 54 temporary blocks, 39 (72%) were effective for a mean of 37 days (median 9, range 2-700). Indications included postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome/dysautonomia (77% effective, 20/26), pancreatitis (86% effective, 12/14), postsurgical pain (62% effective, 8/13), median arcuate ligament syndrome (70% effective, 7/10), chronic pain syndrome (20% effective, 1/5), gastroparesis (80% effective, 4/5), and renal cystic disease (33% effective, 1/3). For postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome /dysautonomia, pancreatitis, post-surgical pain, and MALS, there were no statistically significant differences in effectiveness between celiac vs. splanchnic blocks in groups matched by indication and intended duration (temporary/permanent).

CONCLUSIONS

CT-guided CP/RSN blocks can effectively manage non-cancer related abdominal pain, though there is discrepancy in efficacy between temporary and permanent blocks.

摘要

背景与目的

腹腔神经丛和 retrocrural 内脏神经(CP/RSN)阻滞被广泛用于治疗与癌症相关的腹痛,但关于其对非癌症相关疼痛的疗效的文献有限。我们的目的是确定 CT 引导的 CP/RSN 阻滞在治疗非癌症相关来源腹痛患者中的适应证和有效性。

材料与方法

回顾性分析 2011 年至 2020 年 CT 引导的 CP/RSN 阻滞治疗非癌症相关腹痛患者的患者人口统计学资料、手术细节、疼痛缓解持续时间和并发症。有效阻滞定义为患者报告的疼痛缓解或阿片类药物使用减少持续 2 天或以上的临时阻滞和 14 天或以上的永久阻滞。

结果

72 例 CT 引导的 CP/RSN 阻滞治疗非癌症相关腹痛中,48 例(67%)有效,平均持续时间为 51 天(中位数 14 天,范围 2-700 天)。18 例永久性阻滞中,9 例(50%)有效,平均持续时间为 111 天(中位数 90 天,范围 14-390 天)。54 例临时阻滞中,39 例(72%)有效,平均持续时间为 37 天(中位数 9 天,范围 2-700 天)。适应证包括体位性心动过速综合征/自主神经功能紊乱(77%有效,26/34)、胰腺炎(86%有效,14/16)、术后疼痛(62%有效,13/21)、正中弓状韧带综合征(70%有效,10/14)、慢性疼痛综合征(20%有效,5/25)、胃轻瘫(80%有效,5/6)和肾囊肿性疾病(33%有效,3/9)。对于体位性心动过速综合征/自主神经功能紊乱、胰腺炎、术后疼痛和 MALS,在按适应证和预期持续时间(临时/永久)匹配的情况下,腹腔神经丛阻滞与内脏神经阻滞的有效性无统计学差异。

结论

CT 引导的 CP/RSN 阻滞可以有效治疗非癌症相关的腹痛,尽管临时和永久性阻滞的疗效存在差异。

相似文献

1
Single-Center Review of Celiac Plexus/Retrocrural Splanchnic Nerve Block for Non-Cancer Related Pain.单中心回顾腹腔神经丛/后路内脏神经丛阻滞治疗非癌症相关疼痛。
Acad Radiol. 2021 Nov;28 Suppl 1:S244-S249. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.03.005. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
2
[Neurolytic block of the celiac plexus and splanchnic nerves with computed tomography. The experience in 150 cases and an optimization of the technic].[计算机断层扫描引导下腹腔神经丛和内脏神经的神经溶解阻滞。150例经验及技术优化]
Radiol Med. 1999 Sep;98(3):183-8.
3
Splanchnic block at T11 provides a longer relief than celiac plexus block from nonmalignant, chronic abdominal pain.T11节段的内脏神经阻滞比腹腔神经丛阻滞缓解非恶性慢性腹痛的时间更长。
Pain Manag. 2019 Mar 1;9(2):115-121. doi: 10.2217/pmt-2018-0056. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
4
Low Volume Neurolytic Retrocrural Celiac Plexus Block for Visceral Cancer Pain: Retrospective Review of 507 Patients with Severe Malignancy Related Pain Due to Primary Abdominal Cancer or Metastatic Disease.低容量经后路腹腔神经丛阻滞治疗内脏癌痛:507 例原发性腹部癌症或转移性疾病相关严重恶性肿瘤疼痛患者的回顾性研究。
Pain Physician. 2018 Sep;21(5):497-504.
5
Long-term control of abdominal pain related to POTS: two case reports in pediatrics.与直立性心动过速综合征相关的腹痛的长期控制:两例儿科病例报告
Pain Manag. 2018 Nov 1;8(6):437-440. doi: 10.2217/pmt-2018-0013. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
6
A prospective randomized comparison of endoscopic ultrasound- and computed tomography-guided celiac plexus block for managing chronic pancreatitis pain.内镜超声引导与计算机断层扫描引导下腹腔神经丛阻滞治疗慢性胰腺炎疼痛的前瞻性随机对照研究
Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Apr;94(4):900-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01042.x.
7
Celiac ganglion block.腹腔神经节阻滞
Agri. 2005 Jan;17(1):14-22.
8
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus block for managing abdominal pain associated with chronic pancreatitis: a prospective single center experience.内镜超声引导下腹腔神经丛阻滞治疗慢性胰腺炎相关腹痛:一项前瞻性单中心经验
Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Feb;96(2):409-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03551.x.
9
Comparative Study of the Effects of the Retrocrural Celiac Plexus Block Versus Splanchnic Nerve Block, C-arm Guided, for Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Tumors on Pain Relief and the Quality of Life at a Six-month Follow Up.C形臂引导下,膈脚后腹腔神经丛阻滞与内脏神经阻滞对胃肠道肿瘤患者疼痛缓解及生活质量影响的比较研究:六个月随访结果
Korean J Pain. 2015 Jan;28(1):22-31. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2015.28.1.22. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
10
The Effectiveness of Alcohol Versus Phenol Based Splanchnic Nerve Neurolysis for the Treatment of Intra-Abdominal Cancer Pain.酒精与苯酚内脏神经松解术治疗腹腔内癌痛的疗效比较
Pain Physician. 2016 May;19(4):281-92.

引用本文的文献

1
Common Cryoneurolysis Targets in Pain Management: Indications, Critical Anatomy, and Potential Complications.疼痛管理中常见的冷冻神经溶解靶点:适应证、关键解剖结构及潜在并发症
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2025 Apr 3;42(2):205-212. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1804492. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
16. Pain in chronic pancreatitis.16. 慢性胰腺炎中的疼痛。
Pain Pract. 2025 Apr;25(4):e70030. doi: 10.1111/papr.70030.
3
Percutaneous splanchnic nerve neurolysis analgesic efficacy and safety for cancer-related pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
经皮内脏神经松解术治疗癌性疼痛的疗效和安全性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 May 6;31(6):324. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07746-y.
4
Advances in novel devices for the treatment of heart failure.新型心力衰竭治疗设备的进展。
Heart Fail Rev. 2023 Mar;28(2):331-345. doi: 10.1007/s10741-022-10293-z. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
5
Computed tomography-guided single celiac plexus neurolysis analgesic efficacy and safety: a systematic review and meta-analysis.计算机断层扫描引导下腹腔神经丛单次阻滞的镇痛效果和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 Nov;47(11):3892-3906. doi: 10.1007/s00261-022-03670-7. Epub 2022 Sep 10.