Guo Peng-Le, He Hao-Lan, Chen Xie-Jie, Chen Jin-Feng, Chen Xiao-Ting, Lan Yun, Wang Jian, Du Pei-Shan, Zhong Huo-Lin, Li Hong, Liu Cong, Li Li-Ya, Hu Feng-Yu, Tang Xiao-Ping, Cai Wei-Ping, Li Ling-Hua
Guangzhou Eighth People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Mar 25;11:569766. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.569766. eCollection 2020.
Dual therapy with lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) plus lamivudine (3TC) has been demonstrated to be non-inferior to the triple drug regimen including LPV/r plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) in 48-week studies. However, little is known about the long-term efficacy and drug resistance of this simplified strategy. A randomized, controlled, open-label, non-inferiority trial (ALTERLL) was conducted to assess the efficacy, drug resistance, and safety of dual therapy with LPV/r plus 3TC (DT group), compared with the first-line triple-therapy regimen containing tenofovir (TDF), 3TC plus efavirenz (EFV) (TT group) in antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naïve HIV-1-infected adults in Guangdong, China. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/ml at week 144. Between March 1 and December 31, 2015, a total of 196 patients (from 274 patients screened) were included and randomly assigned to either the DT group (n = 99) or the TT group (n = 97). In the primary intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis at week 144, 95 patients (96%) in the DT group and 93 patients (95.9%) in the TT group achieved virological inhibition with plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/ml (difference: 0.1%; 95% CI, -4.6-4.7%), meeting the criteria for non-inferiority. The DT group did not show significant differences in the mean increase in CD4 cell count (247.0 vs. 204.5 cells/mm; = 0.074) or the CD4/CD8 ratio (0.47 vs. 0.49; = 0.947) from baseline, or the inflammatory biomarker levels through week 144 compared with the TT group. For the subgroup analysis, baseline high viremia (HIV-1 RNA > 100,000 copies/ml) and genotype BC did not affect the primary endpoint or the mean increase in CD4 cell count or CD4/CD8 ratio from baseline at week 144. However, in patients with genotype AE, the DT group showed a higher mean increase in CD4 cell count from baseline through 144 weeks than the TT group (308.7 vs. 209.4 cells/mm; = 0.038). No secondary HIV resistance was observed in either group. Moreover, no severe adverse event (SAE) or death was observed in any group. Nonetheless, more patients in the TT group (6.1%) discontinued the assigned regimen than those in the DT group (1%) due to adverse events. Dual therapy with LPV/r plus 3TC manifests long-term non-inferior therapeutic efficacy, low drug resistance, good safety, and tolerability compared with the first-line triple-therapy regimen in Guangdong, China, indicating dual therapy is a viable alternative in resource-limited areas. [http://www.chictr.org.cn], identifier [ChiCTR1900024611].
在48周的研究中,洛匹那韦/利托那韦(LPV/r)联合拉米夫定(3TC)的双联疗法已被证明不劣于包含LPV/r加两种核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂(NRTIs)的三联药物方案。然而,对于这种简化策略的长期疗效和耐药性知之甚少。在中国广东,开展了一项随机、对照、开放标签、非劣效性试验(ALTERLL),以评估LPV/r联合3TC的双联疗法(DT组)与含替诺福韦(TDF)、3TC加依非韦伦(EFV)的一线三联疗法方案(TT组)在初治的HIV-1感染成人抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)中的疗效、耐药性和安全性。主要终点是第144周时血浆HIV-1 RNA<50拷贝/ml的患者比例。2015年3月1日至12月31日,共纳入196例患者(从274例筛查患者中),并随机分配至DT组(n = 99)或TT组(n = 97)。在第144周的主要意向性分析(ITT)中,DT组95例患者(96%)和TT组93例患者(95.9%)实现了病毒学抑制,血浆HIV-1 RNA<50拷贝/ml(差异:0.1%;95%CI,-4.6-4.7%),符合非劣效标准。与TT组相比,DT组从基线开始的CD4细胞计数平均增加值(247.0对204.5个细胞/mm;P = 0.074)或CD4/CD8比值(0.47对0.49;P = 0.947),以及至第144周的炎症生物标志物水平均无显著差异。对于亚组分析,基线高病毒血症(HIV-1 RNA>100,000拷贝/ml)和BC基因型不影响主要终点或第144周时从基线开始的CD4细胞计数或CD4/CD8比值的平均增加值。然而,在AE基因型患者中,DT组从基线至144周的CD4细胞计数平均增加值高于TT组(308.7对209.4个细胞/mm;P = 0.038)。两组均未观察到继发性HIV耐药。此外,任何一组均未观察到严重不良事件(SAE)或死亡。尽管如此,由于不良事件,TT组中止指定方案的患者(6.1%)多于DT组(1%)。在中国广东,与一线三联疗法方案相比,LPV/r联合3TC的双联疗法表现出长期非劣效的治疗效果、低耐药性、良好的安全性和耐受性,表明双联疗法在资源有限地区是一种可行的替代方案。[http://www.chictr.org.cn],标识符[ChiCTR1900024611]