Sallée Marion, Mercadal Lucile, Jean Guillaume, Guery Bruno, Borniche Didier, Charrel Jan-Marc, Hannedouche Thierry, Roy Frank Le, Brunet Philippe
Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital de la Conception, Marseille, France.
C2VN, Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, INRAE, Marseille, France.
Clin Kidney J. 2020 Oct 2;14(4):1261-1268. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfaa098. eCollection 2021 Apr.
We report the results of an observational study of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) cannulation and haemostasis practices in France.
The study (sponsored by Brothier Pharmaceutical Inc.) was conducted in 150 dialysis units. Data obtained from 150 supervisory nurses, 1538 nurses and 3588 patients with an AVF were analysed.
The nurses reported using rope-ladder, area or buttonhole cannulation techniques in 68, 26 and 6% of cases, respectively. Metal needles were used most frequently (64%), with mainly a diameter of 15 G or 16 G. The needle was introduced with the bevel up in 56% of cases. Compression applied using dressings (in particular, pure calcium alginate dressings) was the method of choice for haemostasis of the puncture sites and was assessed as being strong by most of the nurses and very strong in cases of prolonged bleeding. Most (82%) of the patients reported the use of local anaesthetic before cannulation and 23% reported an allergic skin reaction to the anaesthetic. Bleeding of the puncture sites lasted for >10 min for 48% of the patients and it reappeared between two sessions for 29% of the patients. Whereas the nurses appeared to have a good understanding of AVF, more than half of the patients did not know how to care for it, with 55% requiring more information.
This study underlines the lack of national consensus concerning AVF cannulation practices. It suggests that haemostasis methods of the puncture sites can be improved and it highlights the need to improve patient knowledge.
我们报告了一项关于法国动静脉内瘘(AVF)插管及止血操作的观察性研究结果。
该研究(由布罗蒂尔制药公司赞助)在150个透析单元开展。对从150名督导护士、1538名护士以及3588名有动静脉内瘘的患者处获得的数据进行了分析。
护士报告分别在68%、26%和6%的病例中使用绳梯式、区域式或纽扣式插管技术。最常使用的是金属针(64%),主要直径为15G或16G。56%的病例中针以斜面向上的方式插入。使用敷料(特别是纯海藻酸钙敷料)进行压迫是穿刺部位止血的首选方法,大多数护士认为其效果较强,在出血时间延长的情况下认为效果非常强。大多数(82%)患者报告在插管前使用了局部麻醉剂,23%的患者报告对麻醉剂有皮肤过敏反应。48%的患者穿刺部位出血持续超过10分钟,29%的患者在两次透析之间出血复发。虽然护士似乎对动静脉内瘘有较好的了解,但超过一半的患者不知道如何护理,55%的患者需要更多信息。
本研究强调了在动静脉内瘘插管操作方面缺乏全国性共识。这表明穿刺部位的止血方法可以改进,并突出了提高患者知识水平的必要性。