Verhallen Annemarie M, Kooistra Menno P, van Jaarsveld Brigit C
Dianet Dialysis Centres, Brennerbaan 130, 3524 BN Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007 Sep;22(9):2601-4. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfm043. Epub 2007 Jun 8.
The standard technique for fistula cannulation, the rope-ladder technique, is problematic for patients with short fistula lengths and for patients in whom the fistula is difficult to cannulate. The buttonhole technique, cannulation of exactly the same site, offers the advantage of an easy cannulation procedure. However, it can be used only in native fistulas and cannulation is preferably executed by a 'single-sticker'. This study was conducted to compare these cannulation techniques using objective parameters.
We introduced the buttonhole technique for self-cannulating home haemodialysis patients and compared it with baseline data obtained with the rope-ladder technique. Thirty-three patients with a native arteriovenous fistula were observed prospectively during 18 months on the following parameters: cannulating ease, number of bad sticks, pain, time of compression after cannula removal, bleeding, infectious complications and aneurysm formation.
With the buttonhole method, cannulating ease improved distinctly, which was especially favourable in patients with a short fistula vein. Reported cannulation pain did not change significantly. The incidence of bad sticks decreased significantly, as well as time of compression after cannula removal, without increased incidence of bleeding. Three patients developed a local skin infection of their buttonhole during the study, after which the disinfection routine prior to cannulation was changed.
Compared with the rope-ladder technique, the buttonhole method offers the advantage of an easier cannulation procedure with less bad sticks, which has a special benefit for patients with limited access cannulation sites or with a fistula which is difficult to cannulate. Prolonged compression times or re-bleeding episodes did not occur, but precautions have to be taken in order to prevent infectious complications. The buttonhole method can contribute considerably to the cannulating ease of self-cannulating patients, thus providing a better quality of life.
内瘘穿刺的标准技术——绳梯式穿刺法,对于内瘘长度较短以及穿刺困难的患者存在问题。钮扣眼技术,即在完全相同的部位进行穿刺,具有穿刺操作简便的优点。然而,它仅适用于自体动静脉内瘘,且穿刺最好由“单一穿刺者”进行。本研究旨在使用客观参数比较这些穿刺技术。
我们将钮扣眼技术引入到自体穿刺的家庭血液透析患者中,并将其与绳梯式穿刺法获得的基线数据进行比较。对33例自体动静脉内瘘患者进行了为期18个月的前瞻性观察,观察以下参数:穿刺难易程度、穿刺失败次数、疼痛程度、拔针后压迫时间、出血情况、感染并发症及动脉瘤形成情况。
采用钮扣眼技术后,穿刺难易程度明显改善,这在瘘静脉较短的患者中尤为有利。报告的穿刺疼痛没有明显变化。穿刺失败的发生率显著降低,拔针后的压迫时间也显著缩短,且出血发生率没有增加。在研究期间,有3例患者的钮扣眼部位发生了局部皮肤感染,之后改变了穿刺前的消毒程序。
与绳梯式穿刺法相比,钮扣眼技术具有穿刺操作更简便、穿刺失败次数更少的优点,这对于穿刺部位有限或内瘘穿刺困难的患者尤为有益。未出现压迫时间延长或再次出血的情况,但必须采取预防措施以防止感染并发症。钮扣眼技术可显著提高自体穿刺患者的穿刺便利性,从而改善生活质量。