Suppr超能文献

单胎妊娠中治疗性宫颈环扎术的疗效:一项回顾性研究。

The efficacy of therapeutic cervical cerclage in singleton pregnancies: a retrospective study.

作者信息

Okuhara Michika, Tsuda Hiroyuki, Nishiko Yuki, Fuma Kazuya, Kuribayashi Momoko, Tezuka Atsuko, Ando Tomoko, Mizuno Kimio

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daiichi Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.

出版信息

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(25):6267-6271. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1910663. Epub 2021 Apr 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We compared the pregnancy prolongation effect attributable to cervical cerclage to that achieved by conservative management, and determined the cervical length for which cervical cerclage is effective.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined medical records of 281 women admitted to our hospital between January 2013 and December 2017 for management of threatened preterm birth at 22-28 weeks of gestation. Obstetricians determined suitability for cervical cerclage, which was performed using the McDonald procedure in all cases. Of the 281 subjects, 71 underwent cervical cerclage (cerclage group); the other 210 received conservative therapy (non-cerclage group). We recorded maternal and neonatal characteristics of all patients. The two groups were compared in terms of length of extension of pregnancy and weeks of gestation at delivery. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with extension of time to delivery.

RESULTS

Our analyses revealed that the cerclage group was hospitalized earlier in pregnancy than the non-cerclage group (23.7 ± 1.5 weeks vs. 26.4 ± 1.9 weeks,  < .001) and had shorter cervixes (6.0 ± 9.4 mm vs. 16.9 ± 13.0 mm,  < .001). The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of gestational weeks at delivery. Multivariate analysis regarding extension of pregnancy revealed significant differences in extension of pregnancy related with cervical cerclage (26.65 days, 95% CI 17.0 - 36.3,  < .001) and cervical length <10 mm (-27.4 days, 95% CI -36.0--18.8,  < .001). While the time to delivery was extended by cervical cerclage in women with short cervixes (<25 mm), the two groups did not differ when cervical length was ≥15 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical cerclage was a significant positive factor and short cervix was a significant negative factor for elongating pregnancy. In primigravida and multigravida women with no history of preterm birth, when the cervix is short (<10 mm), cervical cerclage should be recommended.

摘要

目的

我们比较了宫颈环扎术与保守治疗在延长妊娠方面的效果,并确定了宫颈环扎术有效的宫颈长度。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2013年1月至2017年12月期间因妊娠22 - 28周早产风险入院的281名女性的病历。产科医生确定是否适合进行宫颈环扎术,所有病例均采用麦克唐纳手术进行宫颈环扎。在281名受试者中,71人接受了宫颈环扎术(环扎组);另外210人接受了保守治疗(非环扎组)。我们记录了所有患者的母婴特征。比较两组的妊娠延长时间和分娩时的孕周。进行多因素分析以确定与分娩时间延长相关的因素。

结果

我们的分析显示,环扎组妊娠期间住院时间早于非环扎组(23.7±1.5周 vs. 26.4±1.9周,P <.001),且宫颈较短(6.0±9.4mm vs. 16.9±13.0mm,P <.001)。两组在分娩时的孕周方面无显著差异。关于妊娠延长的多因素分析显示,与宫颈环扎术相关的妊娠延长存在显著差异(26.65天,95%CI 17.0 - 36.3,P <.001),宫颈长度<10mm时也存在显著差异(-27.4天,95%CI -36.0 - -18.8,P <.001)。对于宫颈较短(<25mm)的女性,宫颈环扎术可延长分娩时间,但当宫颈长度≥15mm时,两组无差异。

结论

宫颈环扎术是延长妊娠的一个显著积极因素,宫颈短是一个显著消极因素。对于无早产史的初产妇和经产妇,当宫颈较短(<10mm)时,建议进行宫颈环扎术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验