Dayton Children's Hospital, Division of Pediatric Neurology, Dayton, OH, USA.
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Neurological Institute, Epilepsy Center, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychology, Cleveland, OH, USA.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;81(3):973-980. doi: 10.3233/JAD-210028.
Seizure disorders have been identified in patients suffering from different types of dementia. However, the risks associated with the seizure subtypes have not been characterized.
To compare the occurrence and risk of various seizure subtypes (focal and generalized) between patients with and without a dementia diagnosis.
Data from 40.7 million private insured patient individual electronic health records from the U.S., were utilized. Patients 60 years of age or more from the Optum Insight Clinformatics-data Mart database were included in this study. Using ICD-9 diagnoses, the occurrence of generalized or focal seizure disorders was identified. The risk of new-onset seizures and the types of seizures associated with a dementia diagnosis were estimated in a cohort of 2,885,336 patients followed from 2005 to 2014. Group differences were analyzed using continuity-adjusted chi-square and hazard ratios with 95%confidence intervals calculated after a logistic regression analysisResults:A total of 79,561 patient records had a dementia diagnosis, and 56.38%of them were females. Patients with dementia when compared to those without dementia had higher risk for seizure disorders [Hazard ratio (HR) = 6.5 95%CI = 4.4-9.5]; grand mal status (HR = 6.5, 95%CI = 5.7-7.3); focal seizures (HR = 6.0, 95%CI = 5.5-6.6); motor simple focal status (HR = 5.6, 95%CI = 3.5-9.0); epilepsy (HR = 5.0, 95%CI = 4.8-5.2); generalized convulsive epilepsy (HR = 4.8, 95%CI = 4.5-5.0); localization-related epilepsy (HR = 4.5, 95%CI = 4.1-4.9); focal status (HR = 4.2, 95%CI = 2.9-6.1); and fits convulsions (HR = 3.5, 95%CI = 3.4-3.6).
The study confirms that patients with dementia have higher risks of generalized or focal seizure than patients without dementia.
在患有不同类型痴呆症的患者中已经发现了癫痫发作障碍。然而,与各种癫痫发作亚型(局灶性和全面性)相关的风险尚未确定。
比较患有和不患有痴呆症诊断的患者中各种癫痫发作亚型(局灶性和全面性)的发生和风险。
利用来自美国私人保险患者个体电子健康记录的 4070 万份数据。从 Optum Insight Clinformatics-Data Mart 数据库中纳入年龄在 60 岁或以上的患者。使用 ICD-9 诊断,确定全面性或局灶性癫痫发作障碍的发生情况。在 2005 年至 2014 年期间随访的 2885336 例患者队列中,估计新发癫痫发作的风险和与痴呆症诊断相关的癫痫发作类型。使用连续性调整的卡方和风险比进行组间差异分析,并在逻辑回归分析后计算 95%置信区间。
共有 79561 例患者记录有痴呆症诊断,其中 56.38%为女性。与无痴呆症的患者相比,患有痴呆症的患者癫痫发作障碍的风险更高[风险比(HR)=6.5,95%置信区间(CI)=4.4-9.5];强直阵挛发作(HR=6.5,95%CI=5.7-7.3);局灶性发作(HR=6.0,95%CI=5.5-6.6);运动简单局灶性状态(HR=5.6,95%CI=3.5-9.0);癫痫(HR=5.0,95%CI=4.8-5.2);全面性强直阵挛性癫痫(HR=4.8,95%CI=4.5-5.0);定位相关癫痫(HR=4.5,95%CI=4.1-4.9);局灶性状态(HR=4.2,95%CI=2.9-6.1);和发作性抽搐(HR=3.5,95%CI=3.4-3.6)。
该研究证实,痴呆症患者的全面性或局灶性癫痫发作风险高于无痴呆症患者。