Department of Neurology, 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Department of Radiology, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No.88 Jie-fang Road, Shang-cheng District, Hangzhou, 310009, China.
Brain Imaging Behav. 2021 Oct;15(5):2661-2670. doi: 10.1007/s11682-021-00470-3. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
Early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) involves multiple cognitive domains and shows more rapid progression than late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD). However, the difference in pathogenesis between EOAD and LOAD is still unclear. Accordingly, we applied intrinsic network analysis to explore the potential neuropathological mechanism underlying distinct clinical phenotypes. According to the cut-off age of 65, we included 20 EOAD patients, 20 LOAD patients, and 36 age-matched controls (19 young and 17 old controls). We employed resting-state functional MRI and network centrality analysis to explore the local (degree centrality (DC)) and global (eigenvector centrality (EC)) functional integrity. Two-sample t-test analysis was performed, with gray matter volume, age, gender, and education as covariates. Furthermore, we performed a correlation analysis between network metrics and cognition. Compared to young controls, EOAD patients exhibited lower DC in the middle temporal gyrus (MTG), parahippocampal gyrus (PHG), superior temporal gyrus (STG), and lower EC in the MTG, PHG, and postcentral gyrus. In contrast, LOAD patients exhibited lower DC in the STG and anterior cingulum gyrus and higher DC in the middle frontal gyrus compared to old controls. No significant difference in EC was observed in LOAD patients. Furthermore, both DC and EC correlated with cognitive performance. Our study demonstrated divergent functional network impairments in EOAD and LOAD patients. EOAD patients showed more complex network damage involving both local and global centrality properties, while LOAD patients mainly featured local functional connectivity changes. Such centrality impairments are related to poor cognition, especially regarding memory performance.
早发性阿尔茨海默病(EOAD)涉及多个认知领域,其进展速度比晚发性阿尔茨海默病(LOAD)更快。然而,EOAD 和 LOAD 之间的发病机制差异仍不清楚。因此,我们应用内在网络分析来探讨不同临床表型的潜在神经病理学机制。根据 65 岁的截止年龄,我们纳入了 20 名 EOAD 患者、20 名 LOAD 患者和 36 名年龄匹配的对照组(19 名年轻对照组和 17 名年老对照组)。我们采用静息态功能磁共振成像和网络中心性分析来探索局部(度中心度(DC))和全局(特征向量中心度(EC))功能完整性。采用两样本 t 检验分析,以灰质体积、年龄、性别和教育程度为协变量。此外,我们还进行了网络指标与认知之间的相关性分析。与年轻对照组相比,EOAD 患者的颞中回(MTG)、海马旁回(PHG)、颞上回(STG)的 DC 降低,MTG、PHG 和中央后回的 EC 降低。相比之下,LOAD 患者的 STG 和前扣带回的 DC 降低,而额中回的 DC 升高。LOAD 患者的 EC 没有显著差异。此外,DC 和 EC 均与认知表现相关。我们的研究表明,EOAD 和 LOAD 患者的功能网络损伤存在差异。EOAD 患者表现出更复杂的网络损伤,涉及局部和全局中心性特征,而 LOAD 患者主要表现为局部功能连接变化。这种中心性损伤与认知能力下降有关,尤其是记忆力表现。