• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型 SGLT2 抑制剂与 GLP-1 激动剂使用者的心血管、医疗和成本结局的真实世界比较。

A real-world comparison of cardiovascular, medical and costs outcomes in new users of SGLT2 inhibitors versus GLP-1 agonists.

机构信息

Humana Healthcare Research, Inc., Louisville, KY, United States.

Humana Healthcare Research, Inc., Louisville, KY, United States.

出版信息

Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021 May;175:108800. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.108800. Epub 2021 May 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2021.108800
PMID:33845052
Abstract

AIMS

To compare SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists on cardiovascular (CV) outcomes, treatment persistence/discontinuation, healthcare utilization and costs.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study utilized medical and pharmacy claims to identify new SGLT2 inhibitor or GLP-1 agonist users from January 2015 to June 2017. A total of 5,507 patients were included in each treatment group after 1:1 propensity score matching. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare CV outcomes and treatment discontinuation. Healthcare utilization and costs were compared using Wilcoxon signed rank test.

RESULTS

No differences in the primary composite CV outcome or secondary CV outcome were observed. Patients using GLP-1 agonists were more likely to discontinue treatment (hazard ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval 1.10-1.21) and more likely to have an inpatient hospitalization (14.4% vs. 11.9%, P < 0.001) or emergency department visit (27.4% vs. 23.5%, P < 0.001) compared to patients on SGLT2 inhibitors. The average per-person per-month cost difference was +$179 for total cost (P < 0.001), +$70 for medical cost (P < 0.001) and +$108 for pharmacy cost (P < 0.001) for GLP-1 agonists compared to SGLT2 inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in composite CV outcomes were not established. However, other findings that favored SGLT2 inhibitors should be weighed against the known risks associated with this therapeutic class.

摘要

目的

比较 SGLT2 抑制剂和 GLP-1 激动剂在心血管(CV)结局、治疗持续/中断、医疗保健利用和成本方面的差异。

方法

本回顾性队列研究利用医疗和药房理赔数据,从 2015 年 1 月至 2017 年 6 月确定新的 SGLT2 抑制剂或 GLP-1 激动剂使用者。在 1:1 倾向评分匹配后,每组各有 5507 名患者纳入研究。使用 Cox 比例风险模型比较 CV 结局和治疗中断情况。采用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验比较医疗保健利用和成本。

结果

主要复合 CV 结局或次要 CV 结局无差异。使用 GLP-1 激动剂的患者更有可能中断治疗(风险比 1.15,95%置信区间 1.10-1.21),更有可能住院(14.4%比 11.9%,P<0.001)或急诊就诊(27.4%比 23.5%,P<0.001)。与 SGLT2 抑制剂相比,GLP-1 激动剂的人均每月成本差异为总费用增加$179(P<0.001),医疗费用增加$70(P<0.001),药房费用增加$108(P<0.001)。

结论

未确定复合 CV 结局的差异。然而,应该权衡 SGLT2 抑制剂的其他有利发现,以应对该治疗类别相关的已知风险。

相似文献

1
A real-world comparison of cardiovascular, medical and costs outcomes in new users of SGLT2 inhibitors versus GLP-1 agonists.新型 SGLT2 抑制剂与 GLP-1 激动剂使用者的心血管、医疗和成本结局的真实世界比较。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021 May;175:108800. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.108800. Epub 2021 May 4.
2
Effect of frailty on effectiveness and safety of GLP-1 receptor agonists versus SGLT2 inhibitors in people with type 2 diabetes in Taiwan: a retrospective, nationwide, longitudinal study.在台湾,衰弱对 2 型糖尿病患者 GLP-1 受体激动剂与 SGLT2 抑制剂有效性和安全性的影响:一项回顾性、全国性、纵向研究。
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2024 Sep;5(9):100621. doi: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.07.004. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
3
Evaluation of Out-of-Pocket Costs and Treatment Intensification With an SGLT2 Inhibitor or GLP-1 RA in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease.评估伴有心血管疾病的 2 型糖尿病患者使用 SGLT2 抑制剂或 GLP-1RA 的自付费用和治疗强化情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2317886. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17886.
4
Comparison of estimated glomerular filtration rate change with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors versus glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists among people with diabetes: A propensity-score matching study.比较钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂在糖尿病患者中的估算肾小球滤过率变化:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024 Jun;26(6):2422-2430. doi: 10.1111/dom.15561. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
5
Lower risk of death and cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes initiating glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists or sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors: A real-world study in two Italian cohorts.在接受胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂或钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂治疗的糖尿病患者中,死亡和心血管事件风险降低:两项意大利队列的真实世界研究。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 Jul;23(7):1484-1495. doi: 10.1111/dom.14361. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
6
Use of SGLT2 Inhibitors vs GLP-1 RAs and Anemia in Patients With Diabetes and CKD.糖尿病合并慢性肾脏病患者中钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂与胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂的使用及贫血情况
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e240946. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0946.
7
Comparison of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors vs Glucagonlike Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Incidence of Dry Eye Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in Taiwan.比较钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂在台湾 2 型糖尿病患者中干眼疾病发生率的差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2232584. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.32584.
8
Cardiovascular efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂的心血管疗效和安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Diabet Med. 2019 Apr;36(4):444-452. doi: 10.1111/dme.13898. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
9
Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors and the risk of ketoacidosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A nationwide population-based cohort study.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与 2 型糖尿病患者酮症酸中毒风险:一项全国基于人群的队列研究。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Aug;20(8):1852-1858. doi: 10.1111/dom.13297. Epub 2018 Apr 14.
10
Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and risk of major adverse cardiovascular events: multi-database retrospective cohort study.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与主要不良心血管事件风险:多数据库回顾性队列研究。
BMJ. 2020 Sep 23;370:m3342. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3342.

引用本文的文献

1
Health care resource utilization and costs in Medicare Advantage beneficiaries using glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists vs sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors.使用胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂与钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白-2抑制剂的医疗保险优势受益人的医疗保健资源利用情况和成本
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2025 Jul;31(7):627-640. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.7.627.
2
Comparative Effectiveness of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors Versus Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Reducing Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂与胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂对2型糖尿病患者心血管事件的疗效比较
Cureus. 2025 May 14;17(5):e84137. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84137. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Comparing Out-of-Pocket Costs and Health-Related Quality of Life Between Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
2型糖尿病患者中钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂与胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂的自付费用及健康相关生活质量比较
Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2025 Apr 25;17:121-134. doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S496619. eCollection 2025.
4
Healthcare utilization, mortality, and cardiovascular events following GLP1-RA initiation in chronic kidney disease.慢性肾脏病患者起始使用胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP1-RA)后的医疗保健利用情况、死亡率及心血管事件
Nat Commun. 2024 Dec 5;15(1):10623. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-54009-3.
5
Cost consequence analysis of adding semaglutide to treatment regimen for patients with Type II diabetes in Saudi Arabia.在沙特阿拉伯,为2型糖尿病患者的治疗方案添加司美格鲁肽的成本效益分析。
Saudi Pharm J. 2024 May;32(5):102057. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2024.102057. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
6
Cardiorenal effectiveness of empagliflozin vs. glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: final-year results from the EMPRISE study.恩格列净与胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂对心肾的疗效:来自 EMPRISE 研究的最终年度结果。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024 Feb 8;23(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12933-024-02150-0.
7
Comparative effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors versus glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes and mild/moderate chronic kidney disease.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂在伴有 2 型糖尿病和轻度/中度慢性肾脏病患者中的疗效比较。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024 Apr;26(4):1273-1281. doi: 10.1111/dom.15427. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
8
Effectiveness of SGLT2is vs. GLP-1RAs on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular outcomes in T2D patients according to CVD status.根据心血管疾病(CVD)状态,比较钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2is)与胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)对2型糖尿病(T2D)患者心血管和脑血管结局的有效性。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 6;9:1011535. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1011535. eCollection 2022.
9
Commentary: SGLT2is vs. GLP1RAs reduce cardiovascular and all-cause mortality.评论:钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂与胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂可降低心血管疾病死亡率和全因死亡率。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Aug 4;9:987025. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.987025. eCollection 2022.
10
Healthcare Resource Utilization and Associated Costs in New Users of Empagliflozin versus DPP-4 Inhibitors and GLP-1 Agonists: A Comparative Analysis Based on Retrospective Real-World Data from German Sickness Funds.恩格列净新使用者与二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽-1激动剂相比的医疗资源利用及相关成本:基于德国疾病基金回顾性真实世界数据的比较分析
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2022 May 2;14:319-332. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S357540. eCollection 2022.