Hu Sisi, Zanwar Preeti Pushpalata, Jenkins Tara, Sevak Rajkumar J, Jasti Bhaskara R
Thomas J. Long School of Pharmacy, University of the Pacific, Stockton, CA, USA.
Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2025 Apr 25;17:121-134. doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S496619. eCollection 2025.
To compare the impact of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2 inhibitor), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA), with or without metformin, on out of pocket and total prescription expenditure and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
This observational study utilized 2017-2021 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data from patients with T2DM (≥18 years) on SGLT2 inhibitor, GLP-1 RA, with or without metformin, from payer and self-perspective. HRQoL was assessed using physical (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores based on Veterans Rand 12. This study estimated survey-weighed out-of-pocket (OOP) costs for prescription refills and total prescription expenditures. Propensity score matching was used to mitigate selection bias and health expenditures, and HRQoL were compared using the Mann-Whitney -test. P-value thresholds were recalculated using Bonferroni adjustment (Total prescription expenditure or OOP, PCS, and MCS: p=0.017).
Patients on GLP-1 RA alone had significantly higher OOP costs than those on SGLT2 inhibitor alone (median: $166.50 vs $81.00, p<0.01). No significant difference existed between the two treatments for total prescription expenditures (median: $9831.53vs. $9458.80, p=0.059), MCS (median:52.41 vs 53.48, p=0.40), or PCS (median: 45.22 vs 44.54, p=0.19). Patients on metformin with GLP-1 RA had higher OOP costs compared to those on SGLT2 inhibitor with metformin (median: $140.40 vs $107.33, p <0.01). There is a significant difference between the combination treatments for total prescription expenditure (median: $9453.96 vs $6711.47, p<0.01), MCS (median: 54.19 vs 54.30, p=0.70), or PCS (median: 45.69 vs 46.08, p=0.55).
Even though patients on GLP-1 RA have higher OOP costs, the difference in PCS or MCS scores between GLP-1 RA and SGLT2 inhibitor was not significant. Further investigation is needed to study the long-term impact on HRQoL and clinical outcomes.
比较钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2抑制剂)、胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RA),联合或不联合二甲双胍,对2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者自付费用、总处方费用及健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的影响。
本观察性研究使用了2017 - 2021年医疗支出面板调查(MEPS)数据,数据来自使用SGLT2抑制剂、GLP-1 RA联合或不联合二甲双胍的T2DM患者(≥18岁),从支付方和患者自身角度进行分析。基于退伍军人兰德12项量表,使用生理(PCS)和心理成分汇总(MCS)评分评估HRQoL。本研究估算了调查加权后的处方再填充自付费用(OOP)和总处方费用。采用倾向得分匹配法减轻选择偏倚,并使用Mann-Whitney检验比较健康支出和HRQoL。使用Bonferroni校正重新计算P值阈值(总处方费用或OOP、PCS和MCS:p = 0.017)。
仅使用GLP-1 RA的患者自付费用显著高于仅使用SGLT2抑制剂的患者(中位数:166.50美元对81.00美元,p<0.01)。两种治疗方案的总处方费用(中位数:9831.53美元对9458.80美元,p = 0.059)、MCS(中位数:52.41对53.48,p = 0.40)或PCS(中位数:45.22对44.54,p = 0.19)无显著差异。与使用二甲双胍联合SGLT2抑制剂的患者相比,使用二甲双胍联合GLP-1 RA的患者自付费用更高(中位数:140.40美元对107.33美元,p <0.01)。联合治疗方案在总处方费用(中位数:9453.96美元对6711.47美元,p<0.01)、MCS(中位数:54.19对54.30,p = 0.70)或PCS(中位数:45.69对46.08,p = 0.55)方面存在显著差异。
尽管使用GLP-1 RA的患者自付费用较高,但GLP-1 RA与SGLT2抑制剂在PCS或MCS评分上的差异并不显著。需要进一步研究其对HRQoL和临床结局的长期影响。