Suppr超能文献

一项系统评价显示,在运动性耻骨联合炎/运动性疝/核心肌肉损伤/腹股沟部破裂的治疗中,术语、手术技术、术前诊断措施以及地理差异存在高度变异性。

A Systematic Review Shows High Variation in Terminology, Surgical Techniques, Preoperative Diagnostic Measures, and Geographic Differences in the Treatment of Athletic Pubalgia/Sports Hernia/Core Muscle Injury/Inguinal Disruption.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St Joseph's University Medical Center, Paterson, New Jersey, U.S.A..

Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, U.S.A.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2021 Jul;37(7):2377-2390.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.03.049. Epub 2021 Apr 9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review of reported terminologies, surgical techniques, preoperative diagnostic measures, and geographic differences in the treatment of core muscle injury (CMI)/athletic pubalgia/inguinal disruption.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify clinical studies or articles that described a surgical technique to treat CMI refractory to nonoperative treatment. The search phrase used was "core muscle injury" OR "sports hernia" OR "athletic pubalgia" OR "inguinal disruption." The diagnostic terminology, country of publication, preoperative diagnostic measures, surgical technique, and subspecialty of the operating surgeons described in each article were extracted and reported.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, including 3 surgical technique articles and 28 clinical articles (2 Level I evidence, 1 Level II, 4 Level III, and 21 Level IV). A total of 1,571 patients were included. The most common terminology used to describe the diagnosis was "athletic pubalgia," followed by "sports hernia." Plain radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis were the most common imaging modalities used in the preoperative evaluation of CMI/athletic pubalgia/inguinal disruption. Tenderness-to-palpation testing was the most common technique performed during physical examination, although the specific locations assessed with this technique varied substantially. The operating surgeons were general surgeons (16 articles), a combination of orthopaedic and general surgeons (7 articles), or orthopaedic surgeons (5 articles). The most common procedures performed were open or laparoscopic mesh repair, adductor tenotomy, primary tissue (hernia) repair, and rectus abdominis repair. The procedures performed differed on the basis of surgeon subspecialty, geographic location, and year of publication.

CONCLUSIONS

A variety of diagnostic methods and surgical procedures have been used in the treatment of a CMI/athletic pubalgia/sports hernia/inguinal disruption. These procedures are performed by orthopaedic and/or general surgeons, with the procedures performed differing on the basis of surgeon subspecialty and geographic location.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V, systematic review of Level I to V studies.

摘要

目的

对报道的术语、手术技术、术前诊断措施以及核心肌肉损伤(CMI)/运动性疝/腹股沟破裂治疗的地域差异进行系统评价。

方法

通过搜索 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆和 Embase,对描述治疗非手术治疗无效的 CMI 的手术技术的临床研究或文章进行系统评价。使用的搜索词是“核心肌肉损伤”或“运动疝”或“运动性疝”或“腹股沟破裂”。提取并报告每篇文章中描述的诊断术语、出版国家/地区、术前诊断措施、手术技术和手术医生的专业领域。

结果

符合纳入和排除标准的研究有 31 项,包括 3 项手术技术文章和 28 项临床文章(2 项 I 级证据、1 项 II 级、4 项 III 级和 21 项 IV 级)。共纳入 1571 例患者。最常用于描述诊断的术语是“运动性疝”,其次是“运动疝”。骨盆的 X 线平片和磁共振成像(MRI)是 CMI/运动性疝/腹股沟破裂术前评估最常用的影像学检查方法。压痛触诊检查是体格检查中最常用的技术,但该技术评估的具体部位差异很大。手术医生是普通外科医生(16 篇文章)、骨科和普通外科医生的组合(7 篇文章)或骨科医生(5 篇文章)。最常进行的手术是开放式或腹腔镜网片修补术、内收肌切开术、原发组织(疝)修补术和腹直肌修补术。手术的实施因外科医生的专业领域、地理位置和发表年份而异。

结论

在 CMI/运动性疝/运动性疝/腹股沟破裂的治疗中,已经使用了多种诊断方法和手术程序。这些手术由骨科和/或普通外科医生进行,手术的实施因外科医生的专业领域和地理位置而异。

证据水平

V 级,对 I 至 V 级研究的系统评价。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验