• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体和群体知觉的比较:多个群体成员并不会增加刻板印象启动。

Comparing person and people perception: Multiple group members do not increase stereotype priming.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.

School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Aug;74(8):1418-1431. doi: 10.1177/17470218211012852. Epub 2021 Apr 26.

DOI:10.1177/17470218211012852
PMID:33845706
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8261783/
Abstract

A characteristic feature of daily life is encountering people in groups. Surprisingly, however, at least during the initial stages of processing, research has focused almost exclusively on the construal of single individuals. As such, it remains unclear whether person and people (i.e., group) perception yield comparable or divergent outcomes. Addressing this issue, here we explored a core social-cognitive topic-stereotype activation-by presenting both single and multiple facial primes in a sequential-priming task. In addition, the processes underlying task performance were probed using a drift diffusion model analysis. Based on prior work, it was hypothesised that multiple (vs. single) primes would increase stereotype-based responding. Across two experiments, a consistent pattern of results emerged. First, stereotype priming was insensitive to the number of primes that were presented and occurred only at a short prime-target stimulus onset asynchrony (i.e., 250 ms). Second, priming was underpinned by a bias towards congruent (vs. incongruent) prime-target responses. Collectively these findings advance understanding of the emergence and origin of stereotype priming during person and people perception.

摘要

日常生活的一个特点是经常会遇到成群的人。然而,令人惊讶的是,至少在处理的初始阶段,研究几乎完全集中在对单个个体的解释上。因此,人们不清楚个体和群体(即人群)感知是否会产生类似或不同的结果。为了解决这个问题,我们在一个连续启动任务中同时呈现单个和多个面部启动来探索一个核心的社会认知话题——刻板印象激活。此外,我们还使用漂移扩散模型分析来探究任务表现背后的过程。基于先前的工作,我们假设多个(而不是单个)启动会增加基于刻板印象的反应。在两个实验中,出现了一致的结果模式。首先,刻板印象启动对呈现的启动数量不敏感,仅在短的启动-目标刺激时距(即 250 毫秒)出现。其次,启动是由对一致(而非不一致)的启动-目标反应的偏向所支撑的。总的来说,这些发现增进了对个体和群体感知过程中刻板印象启动的出现和起源的理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3321/8261783/60aa275beeb3/10.1177_17470218211012852-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3321/8261783/47f76a2cfdf7/10.1177_17470218211012852-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3321/8261783/3d862b7f318b/10.1177_17470218211012852-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3321/8261783/277c2bffbb98/10.1177_17470218211012852-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3321/8261783/05beeef59572/10.1177_17470218211012852-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3321/8261783/60aa275beeb3/10.1177_17470218211012852-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3321/8261783/47f76a2cfdf7/10.1177_17470218211012852-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3321/8261783/3d862b7f318b/10.1177_17470218211012852-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3321/8261783/277c2bffbb98/10.1177_17470218211012852-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3321/8261783/05beeef59572/10.1177_17470218211012852-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3321/8261783/60aa275beeb3/10.1177_17470218211012852-fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing person and people perception: Multiple group members do not increase stereotype priming.个体和群体知觉的比较:多个群体成员并不会增加刻板印象启动。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Aug;74(8):1418-1431. doi: 10.1177/17470218211012852. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
2
Stereotype-based priming without stereotype activation: A tale of two priming tasks.基于刻板印象的启动而不激活刻板印象:两种启动任务的故事。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Nov;73(11):1939-1948. doi: 10.1177/1747021820925396. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
3
Sequential Stereotype Priming: A Meta-Analysis.连续刻板印象启动:一项元分析。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2018 Aug;22(3):199-227. doi: 10.1177/1088868317723532. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
4
People perception and stereotype-based responding: task context matters.人们的感知和基于刻板印象的反应:任务背景很重要。
Psychol Res. 2023 Jun;87(4):1219-1231. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01724-5. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
5
Predictably confirmatory: The influence of stereotypes during decisional processing.可预测的确认性:决策过程中刻板印象的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Oct;72(10):2437-2451. doi: 10.1177/1747021819844219. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
6
The power of the unexpected: Prediction errors enhance stereotype-based learning.意外的力量:预测误差增强基于刻板印象的学习。
Cognition. 2023 Jun;235:105386. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105386. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
7
Priming of disability and elderly stereotype in motor performance: similar or specific effects?运动表现中残疾和老年人刻板印象的启动:相似还是特定的影响?
Percept Mot Skills. 2012 Apr;114(2):397-406. doi: 10.2466/07.17.PMS.114.2.397-406.
8
Gender Stereotype Activation versus Lexical Semantic Activation: An ERP Study.性别刻板印象激活与词汇语义激活:一项事件相关电位研究
J Gen Psychol. 2017 Oct-Dec;144(4):283-308. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2017.1310714. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
9
Seeing is not stereotyping: the functional independence of categorization and stereotype activation.眼见并非成见:分类与刻板印象激活的功能独立性。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 May 1;12(5):758-764. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx009.
10
The effects of age-stereotype priming on the memory performance of older adults.年龄刻板印象启动对老年人记忆表现的影响。
Exp Aging Res. 2002 Apr-Jun;28(2):169-81. doi: 10.1080/03610730252800184.

引用本文的文献

1
Adult age differences in the integration of values for self and other.成人在自我与他人价值观整合方面的年龄差异。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 14;15(1):12776. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96656-6.
2
People perception and stereotype-based responding: task context matters.人们的感知和基于刻板印象的反应:任务背景很重要。
Psychol Res. 2023 Jun;87(4):1219-1231. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01724-5. Epub 2022 Aug 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Stereotype-based priming without stereotype activation: A tale of two priming tasks.基于刻板印象的启动而不激活刻板印象:两种启动任务的故事。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Nov;73(11):1939-1948. doi: 10.1177/1747021820925396. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
2
Is this my group or not? The role of ensemble coding of emotional expressions in group categorization.这是我的小组吗?情绪表达的整体编码在群体分类中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Mar;149(3):445-460. doi: 10.1037/xge0000651. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
3
The neural representation of mental beliefs held by two agents.
两个主体所持心理信念的神经表示。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Dec;19(6):1433-1443. doi: 10.3758/s13415-019-00714-2.
4
Predictably confirmatory: The influence of stereotypes during decisional processing.可预测的确认性:决策过程中刻板印象的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Oct;72(10):2437-2451. doi: 10.1177/1747021819844219. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
5
Groups at a glance: Perceivers infer social belonging in a group based on perceptual summaries of sex ratio.群体一览:感知者根据性别比例的感知总结来推断群体的社会归属。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Nov;147(11):1660-1676. doi: 10.1037/xge0000450.
6
The role of sensorimotor processes in social group contagion.感觉运动过程在社会群体传染中的作用。
Cogn Psychol. 2018 Jun;103:23-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
7
Ensemble Perception.整体感知。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2018 Jan 4;69:105-129. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044232. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
8
Sequential Stereotype Priming: A Meta-Analysis.连续刻板印象启动:一项元分析。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2018 Aug;22(3):199-227. doi: 10.1177/1088868317723532. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
9
Looking the part (to me): effects of racial prototypicality on race perception vary by prejudice.符合形象(在我看来):种族原型对种族认知的影响因偏见而异。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Apr 1;12(4):685-694. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsw177.
10
Diffusion Decision Model: Current Issues and History.扩散决策模型:当前问题与历史
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Apr;20(4):260-281. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Mar 5.