• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血栓弹力描记术是严重创伤性脑损伤中临床显著进行性出血性损伤的标志物。

Thromboelastography is a Marker for Clinically Significant Progressive Hemorrhagic Injury in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

Neurocrit Care. 2021 Dec;35(3):738-746. doi: 10.1007/s12028-021-01217-0. Epub 2021 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1007/s12028-021-01217-0
PMID:33846901
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Coagulopathy in traumatic brain injury (TBI) is associated with increased risk of poor outcomes, but accurate prediction of clinically significant progressive hemorrhagic injury (PHI) in patients with severe TBI remains a challenge. Thromboelastography (TEG) is a real-time test of whole blood coagulation that provides dynamic information about global hemostasis. This study aimed to identify differences in TEG values between patients with severe TBI who did or did not experience clinically significant PHI.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of adult patients with severe TBI. Patients were eligible for inclusion if initial Glasgow coma scale (GCS) was ≤ 8 and baseline head computed tomography (CT) imaging and TEG were available. Exclusion criteria included receipt of hemostatic agents prior to TEG. PHI was defined as bleeding expansion on CT within 24 h associated with 2-point drop in GCS, neurosurgical intervention, or mortality within 24 h. The primary endpoint was TEG value differences between patients with and without PHI. Secondary endpoints included differences in conventional coagulation tests (CCTs) between groups.

RESULTS

Of the 526 patients evaluated, 141 met inclusion criteria. The most common reason for exclusion was lack of baseline TEG and receipt of reversal product prior to TEG. Sixty-four patients experienced PHI in the first 24 h after presentation. K time (2.03 min vs. 1.33 min, P = 0.035) and alpha angle (65° vs. 69°, P = 0.015) were found to be significantly different in patients experiencing PHI. R time (5.25 min vs. 4.71 min), maximum amplitude (61 mm vs. 63 mm), and clot lysis at 30 min after maximum clot strength (3.5% vs. 1.7%) were not significantly different between groups. Of the CCTs, only activated partial thromboplastin time (30.3 s vs. 27.6 s, P = 0.014) was found to be different in patients with PHI.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged K time and narrower alpha angle were found to be associated with developing clinically significant PHI in patients with severe TBI. Despite differences detected in alpha angle, median values in both groups were within normal reference ranges. These abnormalities may reflect pathologic hypoactivity of fibrinogen, and further study is warranted to evaluate TEG-guided cryoprecipitate administration in this patient population.

摘要

背景

创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的凝血功能障碍与不良预后风险增加相关,但准确预测严重 TBI 患者临床显著进展性出血性损伤(PHI)仍然是一个挑战。血栓弹性描记术(TEG)是一种实时全血凝血检测,可提供关于整体止血的动态信息。本研究旨在确定 TEG 值在发生和未发生临床显著 PHI 的严重 TBI 患者之间的差异。

方法

这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究,纳入了严重 TBI 的成年患者。如果初始格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分≤8,且有基线头部 CT 成像和 TEG 可用,则患者符合纳入标准。排除标准包括在 TEG 之前接受止血剂。PHI 定义为在 24 小时内 CT 上的出血扩展,伴有 GCS 下降 2 分、神经外科干预或 24 小时内死亡。主要终点是 PHI 患者和非 PHI 患者之间的 TEG 值差异。次要终点包括两组之间常规凝血检测(CCTs)的差异。

结果

在评估的 526 名患者中,有 141 名符合纳入标准。排除的最常见原因是缺乏基线 TEG 和在 TEG 之前接受逆转产品。64 名患者在出现后 24 小时内发生 PHI。在发生 PHI 的患者中,K 时间(2.03 分钟比 1.33 分钟,P=0.035)和 alpha 角(65°比 69°,P=0.015)明显不同。R 时间(5.25 分钟比 4.71 分钟)、最大振幅(61 毫米比 63 毫米)和最大凝血强度后 30 分钟的血凝块溶解(3.5%比 1.7%)在两组之间无显著差异。在 CCT 中,仅活化部分凝血活酶时间(30.3 秒比 27.6 秒,P=0.014)在发生 PHI 的患者中存在差异。

结论

在严重 TBI 患者中,K 时间延长和 alpha 角变窄与发生临床显著 PHI 相关。尽管在 alpha 角检测到差异,但两组的中位数均在正常参考范围内。这些异常可能反映纤维蛋白原的病理性低活性,需要进一步研究来评估 TEG 指导下在该患者人群中使用冷沉淀。

相似文献

1
Thromboelastography is a Marker for Clinically Significant Progressive Hemorrhagic Injury in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.血栓弹力描记术是严重创伤性脑损伤中临床显著进行性出血性损伤的标志物。
Neurocrit Care. 2021 Dec;35(3):738-746. doi: 10.1007/s12028-021-01217-0. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
2
Association of Thromboelastography with Progression of Hemorrhagic Injury in Children with Traumatic Brain Injury.血栓弹力描记术与创伤性脑损伤患儿出血性损伤进展的相关性。
Neurocrit Care. 2023 Apr;38(2):326-334. doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01562-8. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
3
Critical traumatic brain injury is associated with worse coagulopathy.严重创伤性脑损伤与更严重的凝血功能障碍有关。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Aug 1;91(2):331-335. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003253.
4
Noncitrated whole blood is optimal for evaluation of postinjury coagulopathy with point-of-care rapid thrombelastography.对于使用即时护理快速血栓弹力图评估创伤后凝血病而言,未枸橼酸化的全血是最佳选择。
J Surg Res. 2009 Sep;156(1):133-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.03.046. Epub 2009 May 3.
5
Utility of Thromboelastography in Detecting NOAC-Related Coagulopathy in Traumatic Brain Injury.血栓弹力描记术在检测创伤性脑损伤中新型口服抗凝剂相关凝血障碍的作用。
J Surg Res. 2023 Mar;283:423-427. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.09.010. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
6
Predicting progressive hemorrhagic injury from isolated traumatic brain injury and coagulation.从单纯性创伤性脑损伤和凝血情况预测进行性出血性损伤。
Surgery. 2015 Sep;158(3):655-61. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.02.029. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
7
Ability of Fibrin Monomers to Predict Progressive Hemorrhagic Injury in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.纤维蛋白单体预测严重创伤性脑损伤患者进行性出血性损伤的能力。
Neurocrit Care. 2020 Aug;33(1):182-195. doi: 10.1007/s12028-019-00882-6.
8
Admission rapid thrombelastography can replace conventional coagulation tests in the emergency department: experience with 1974 consecutive trauma patients.急诊床旁血栓弹力图检测可替代常规凝血检测:1974 例连续创伤患者的应用经验。
Ann Surg. 2012 Sep;256(3):476-86. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182658180.
9
The correlation between conventional coagulation tests and thromboelastography in each phase of liver transplantation.常规凝血试验与血栓弹力描记术在肝移植各阶段的相关性。
Clin Transplant. 2019 Mar;33(3):e13478. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13478. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
10
Application of a TEG-Platelet Mapping Algorithm to Guide Reversal of Antiplatelet Agents in Adults with Mild-to-Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury: An Observational Pilot Study.应用血栓弹力图血小板功能分析算法指导轻度至中度创伤性脑损伤成人抗血小板药物的逆转:一项观察性试点研究。
Neurocrit Care. 2022 Dec;37(3):638-648. doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01535-x. Epub 2022 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Time-limited association between plasma transfusion and mortality in pediatric traumatic brain injury.小儿创伤性脑损伤中血浆输注与死亡率的限时关联。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2025 Jun 6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004694.
2
A study on the relationship between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in neurosurgery and the occurrence and prognosis of progressive hemorrhagic brain injury (PHI) in patients with traumatic brain injury.一项关于神经外科中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)与创伤性脑损伤患者进行性出血性脑损伤(PHI)发生及预后关系的研究。
BMC Neurol. 2024 Dec 19;24(1):484. doi: 10.1186/s12883-024-03986-5.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of in-house cryoprecipitate on transfusion usage and mortality in patients with multiple trauma with severe traumatic brain injury: a retrospective cohort study.内源性冷沉淀对伴有严重创伤性脑损伤的多发创伤患者输血使用和死亡率的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Blood Transfus. 2020 Jan;18(1):6-12. doi: 10.2450/2019.0198-18. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
SHock-INduced Endotheliopathy (SHINE): A mechanistic justification for viscoelastography-guided resuscitation of traumatic and non-traumatic shock.
休克诱导的内皮病变(SHINE):创伤性和非创伤性休克粘弹性成像引导复苏的机制依据
Front Physiol. 2023 Feb 27;14:1094845. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1094845. eCollection 2023.
4
Letter to the Editor Regarding "Viscoelastic Hemostatic Assays and Outcomes in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Literature Review".致编辑的信:关于“创伤性脑损伤中的粘弹性止血检测与结果:系统文献综述”
World Neurosurg. 2022 Oct;166:291-293. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.04.040.
5
Controversies and evidence gaps in the early management of severe traumatic brain injury: back to the ABCs.重度创伤性脑损伤早期管理中的争议与证据空白:回归基础生命支持。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2022 Jan 5;7(1):e000859. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2021-000859. eCollection 2022.
6
A predictive model for postoperative progressive haemorrhagic injury in traumatic brain injuries.创伤性脑损伤术后进行性出血性损伤的预测模型。
BMC Neurol. 2022 Jan 7;22(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12883-021-02541-w.
7
Viscoelastic Testing and Coagulopathy of Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤的粘弹性测试与凝血病
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 28;10(21):5039. doi: 10.3390/jcm10215039.
8
Use of Thromboelastography in the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.血栓弹力图在创伤性脑损伤患者评估与管理中的应用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Crit Care Explor. 2021 Sep 14;3(9):e0526. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000526. eCollection 2021 Sep.