Kvint Svetlana, Gutierrez Alexis, Venezia Anya, Maloney Eileen, Schuster James, Kumar Monisha A
Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street 3 Silverstein, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Neurocrit Care. 2022 Dec;37(3):638-648. doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01535-x. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
Traumatic intracranial hemorrhages expand in one third of cases, and antiplatelet medications may exacerbate hematoma expansion. However, the reversal of an antiplatelet effect with platelet transfusion has been associated with harm. We sought to determine whether a thromboelastography platelet mapping (TEG-PM)-guided algorithm could limit platelet transfusion in patients with hemorrhagic traumatic brain injury (TBI) prescribed antiplatelet medications without a resultant clinically significant increase in hemorrhage volume, late hemostatic treatments, or delayed operative intervention.
A total of 175 consecutive patients with TBI were admitted to our university-affiliated, level I trauma center between March 2016 and December 2019: 54 preintervention patients (control) and 121 patients with TEG-PM (study). After exclusion for anticoagulant administration, availability of neuroimaging and emergent neurosurgery, 62 study patients and 37 control patients remained. Intervention consisted of administration of desmopressin (DDAVP) for nonsurgical patients with significant inhibition at the arachidonic acid or adenosine diphosphate receptor sites. For surgical patients with significant inhibition, dual therapy with DDAVP and platelet transfusion was employed. Study patients were compared with a group of historical controls, which were identified from a prospectively maintained registry and typically treated with empiric platelet transfusion.
Median age was 75 years (interquartile range 85-67) and 77 years (interquartile range 81-65) in the TEG-PM and control patient groups, respectively. Admission hemorrhage volumes were similar (10.7 cm [20.1] in patients with TEG-PM vs. 14.1 cm [19.7] in controls; p = 0.41). There were no significant differences in admission Glasgow Coma Scale, mechanism of trauma, or baseline comorbidities. A total of 57% of controls versus 10% of patients with TEG-PM (p < 0.001) were transfused platelets; 52% of intervention patients and 0% controls were treated with DDAVP. Expansion hemorrhage volumes were not significantly different (14.0 cm [20.2] patients with TEG-PM versus 13.6 cm [23.7] controls; p = 0.93). There was no significant difference in rates of clinical deterioration, delayed neurosurgical intervention, or late platelet transfusion between groups.
Among patients with hemorrhagic TBI prescribed preinjury antiplatelet therapy, our study suggests that the use of a TEG-PM algorithm may reduce platelet transfusions without a concurrent increase in clinically significant hematoma expansion. Further study is required to prove a causative relationship.
三分之一的创伤性颅内出血会扩大,抗血小板药物可能会加剧血肿扩大。然而,通过输注血小板逆转抗血小板作用已被证明存在危害。我们试图确定血栓弹力图血小板功能分析(TEG-PM)指导的算法是否可以限制在服用抗血小板药物的出血性创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者中输注血小板,而不会导致出血体积、后期止血治疗或延迟手术干预出现临床上显著增加的情况。
2016年3月至2019年12月期间,共有175例连续的TBI患者被收治到我们大学附属的一级创伤中心:54例干预前患者(对照组)和121例接受TEG-PM的患者(研究组)。在排除抗凝剂使用、神经影像学检查可用性和急诊神经外科手术因素后,研究组剩余62例患者,对照组剩余37例患者。干预措施包括对在花生四烯酸或二磷酸腺苷受体位点有显著抑制作用的非手术患者给予去氨加压素(DDAVP)。对于有显著抑制作用的手术患者,采用DDAVP和血小板输注的联合治疗。将研究组患者与一组历史对照组进行比较,历史对照组从一个前瞻性维护的登记册中确定,通常接受经验性血小板输注治疗。
TEG-PM组和对照组患者的中位年龄分别为75岁(四分位间距85 - 67岁)和77岁(四分位间距81 - 65岁)。入院时的出血体积相似(TEG-PM组患者为10.7 cm³[20.1],对照组为14.1 cm³[19.7];p = 0.41)。入院时的格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分、创伤机制或基线合并症方面没有显著差异。对照组中有57%的患者接受了血小板输注,而TEG-PM组中这一比例为10%(p < 0.001);52%的干预患者和0%的对照组患者接受了DDAVP治疗。出血体积扩大情况无显著差异(TEG-PM组患者为14.0 cm³[20.2],对照组为13.6 cm³[23.7];p = 0.93)。两组之间在临床恶化率、延迟神经外科干预率或后期血小板输注率方面没有显著差异。
在受伤前接受抗血小板治疗的出血性TBI患者中,我们的研究表明,使用TEG-PM算法可能会减少血小板输注,同时不会导致临床上显著的血肿扩大增加。需要进一步研究来证明因果关系。