Department of Cardiology, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Obesity and Comorbidities Research Center, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Obes Rev. 2021 Jun;22(6):e13224. doi: 10.1111/obr.13224. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
Despite being approved for clinical use, evidence of cardiovascular safety (CV) is lacking for treatment with bupropion, naltrexone, or their combination (B-N). The purpose of the study is to determine the relationship between these treatments and the risk of major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE). Phase 3 randomized clinical trials (RCT) evaluating bupropion, naltrexone, or B-N versus control with reported incidence of MACE. The meta-analysis included 12 RCTs, 69% for weight loss and 29% for smoking cessation, with 19,176 patients and 7354 patient-years who were randomized to an active treatment (bupropion [n = 2965] or B-N [n = 6980] or naltrexone [n = 249]) versus control (placebo [n = 6968] or nicotine patch [n = 2014]). The mean age was 54 ± 8 years (55% female), and the baseline BMI was 32 ± 5 kg/m . The additive network meta-analysis model for random effects showed no association between bupropion, B-N, or naltrexone and MACE (odds ratio [OR] = 0.90 [95%CI 0.65-1.25], p = 0.52; OR = 0.97 [95%CI 0.75-1.24], p = 0.79; OR = 1.08 [95%CI 0.71-1.63], p = 0.73, respectively; I = 0%, p = 0.86). Meta-regression analyses showed no significant association between MACE and potential confounders from RCT demographic disparities (p = 0.58). The statistical power (post hoc two-tailed) for non-inferiority was 91%, giving a strong probability of validity. Naltrexone, bupropion, or B-N is not associated with the incidence of MACE as compared with placebo.
尽管已获准临床使用,但缺乏关于使用安非他酮、纳曲酮或两者联合(B-N)治疗的心血管安全性(CV)证据。本研究的目的是确定这些治疗方法与主要心血管不良事件(MACE)风险之间的关系。评估安非他酮、纳曲酮或 B-N 与对照治疗(MACE 发生率报告)的 3 期随机临床试验(RCT)。荟萃分析纳入了 12 项 RCT,其中 69%用于减肥,29%用于戒烟,共有 19176 名患者和 7354 患者年被随机分配至活性治疗(安非他酮 [n=2965] 或 B-N [n=6980] 或纳曲酮 [n=249])与对照(安慰剂 [n=6968] 或尼古丁贴片 [n=2014])。平均年龄为 54±8 岁(55%为女性),基线 BMI 为 32±5kg/m2。对于随机效应的附加网络荟萃分析模型,未发现安非他酮、B-N 或纳曲酮与 MACE 之间存在关联(比值比 [OR] =0.90[95%CI 0.65-1.25],p=0.52;OR=0.97[95%CI 0.75-1.24],p=0.79;OR=1.08[95%CI 0.71-1.63],p=0.73,I=0%,p=0.86)。荟萃回归分析显示,MACE 与 RCT 人群差异的潜在混杂因素之间无显著关联(p=0.58)。非劣效性事后双侧检验的统计功效(power)为 91%,具有较强的有效性概率。与安慰剂相比,纳曲酮、安非他酮或 B-N 与 MACE 的发生率无关。