Harris D A, Burns R A, Ali R
Mead Johnson Nutritional Group, Department of Food and Nutrition Research, Evansville, IN 47721.
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1988 Mar-Apr;71(2):353-7.
Two-week protein efficiency ratio (2-wk PER), net protein ratio (NPR), calculated-protein efficiency ratio (C-PER), and discriminant computed-protein efficiency ratio (DC-PER) of milk- and soy-based infant formulas were compared to a 4-week protein efficiency ratio (PER). Expressed relative to ANRC casein, 2-week PER and NPR correlated significantly (P less than 0.01, r = 0.90) with PER. Although C-PER and DC-PER also correlated significantly (P less than 0.01) with PER, r = 0.71 and r = 0.87, respectively, these in vitro methods did not distinguish differences in protein quality among soy-based infant formulas. C-PER and DC-PER, as currently designed, are not applicable to the measurement of protein quality for all types of infant formulas.
将基于牛奶和大豆的婴儿配方奶粉的两周蛋白质效率比(2-wk PER)、净蛋白质比(NPR)、计算蛋白质效率比(C-PER)和判别计算蛋白质效率比(DC-PER)与四周蛋白质效率比(PER)进行了比较。相对于ANRC酪蛋白表示,2周PER和NPR与PER显著相关(P小于0.01,r = 0.90)。尽管C-PER和DC-PER也与PER显著相关(P小于0.01),r分别为0.71和0.87,但这些体外方法并未区分基于大豆的婴儿配方奶粉之间蛋白质质量的差异。目前设计的C-PER和DC-PER不适用于所有类型婴儿配方奶粉蛋白质质量的测量。