Suppr超能文献

婴儿配方奶粉蛋白质质量评估:体外方法与体内方法的比较。

Evaluation of infant formula protein quality: comparison of in vitro with in vivo methods.

作者信息

Harris D A, Burns R A, Ali R

机构信息

Mead Johnson Nutritional Group, Department of Food and Nutrition Research, Evansville, IN 47721.

出版信息

J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1988 Mar-Apr;71(2):353-7.

PMID:3384784
Abstract

Two-week protein efficiency ratio (2-wk PER), net protein ratio (NPR), calculated-protein efficiency ratio (C-PER), and discriminant computed-protein efficiency ratio (DC-PER) of milk- and soy-based infant formulas were compared to a 4-week protein efficiency ratio (PER). Expressed relative to ANRC casein, 2-week PER and NPR correlated significantly (P less than 0.01, r = 0.90) with PER. Although C-PER and DC-PER also correlated significantly (P less than 0.01) with PER, r = 0.71 and r = 0.87, respectively, these in vitro methods did not distinguish differences in protein quality among soy-based infant formulas. C-PER and DC-PER, as currently designed, are not applicable to the measurement of protein quality for all types of infant formulas.

摘要

将基于牛奶和大豆的婴儿配方奶粉的两周蛋白质效率比(2-wk PER)、净蛋白质比(NPR)、计算蛋白质效率比(C-PER)和判别计算蛋白质效率比(DC-PER)与四周蛋白质效率比(PER)进行了比较。相对于ANRC酪蛋白表示,2周PER和NPR与PER显著相关(P小于0.01,r = 0.90)。尽管C-PER和DC-PER也与PER显著相关(P小于0.01),r分别为0.71和0.87,但这些体外方法并未区分基于大豆的婴儿配方奶粉之间蛋白质质量的差异。目前设计的C-PER和DC-PER不适用于所有类型婴儿配方奶粉蛋白质质量的测量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验