What is known about factors improving physiotherapists' adherence to high value interventions in nonspecific low back pain? A scoping review protocol.

INTRODUCTION

Despite multiple guidelines providing best practice treatment recommendations for managing low back pain (LBP), current evidence suggests that physiotherapists across the world often provide costly, ineffective, unnecessary, even harmful care. The purpose of this scoping review is to establish the body of evidence regarding factors that improve or hinder physiotherapist's adherence to high-value interventions in the management of non-specific LBP.

METHODS

This scoping review will be conducted based on the methodological framework for scoping review recommended by Arksey & O'Malley's and Levac. Three electronic databases will be searched: MEDLINE, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus. A search of grey literature will also be performed. The search will cover studies published in English from the inception of each database to the present date. The reference lists of all included reports and articles will be hand-searched for additional results. Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts for assessment against the eligibility criteria. Data will be extracted and presented in tabular form and a narrative summary that aligns with the review's aim.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This scoping review does not require ethics approval. Results of this scoping review will be disseminated via conference presentation and/or publication in a scientific journal. We will also disseminate the results as part of stakeholder meetings with physiotherapists including clinicians, academicians, researchers and administrators managing non-specific LBP. A summary of the key results will be shared across social networking sites in the form of infographics.