Suppr超能文献

体重对依诺肝素预防性抗凝治疗高危创伤患者抗 Xa 水平的影响。

Impact of Weight on Anti-Xa Attainment in High-Risk Trauma Patients on Enoxaparin Chemoprophylaxis.

机构信息

University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, Colorado; Department of Pharmacy Services, UC Health - University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.

Department of Pharmacy Services, UC Health - University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; University of Cincinnati James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, Cincinnati, Ohio.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2021 Aug;264:425-434. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.03.020. Epub 2021 Apr 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Serum anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) concentration may guide low molecular weight heparin chemoprophylaxis in trauma patients. Higher total body weight (TBW) is a risk factor for subprophylactic anti-Xa and venous thromboembolism (VTE). The purpose of this study was to evaluate TBW differences in patients with subprophylactic versus prophylactic trough anti-Xa.

METHODS

This retrospective study included adults admitted to the trauma service who received enoxaparin chemoprophylaxis, trough anti-Xa assessment, and screening duplex ultrasound. Initial enoxaparin dose was determined per trauma team weight-tiered protocol with subsequent 10 mg increase if anti-Xa was subprophylactic. Patients were stratified into subprophylactic (anti-Xa <0.1 IU/ml) and prophylactic (anti-Xa ≥0.1 IU/mL) groups. The primary outcome was difference in TBW. Secondary outcomes were weight-adjusted enoxaparin dose (mg/kg), VTE, red blood cell (pRBC) transfusions.

RESULTS

A total of 887 patients were included with 681 (76.8%) having subprophylactic anti-Xa. The subprophylactic group had significantly younger age, higher proportion male sex, higher Injury Severity Score (ISS), higher BMI, and longer length of hospital stay. The subprophylactic group had higher TBW (median [IQR], 87.8 [74-102] kg vs. 78.9 [68-91.8] kg; P < 0.001) which equated to a lower weight-adjusted dose (0.34 [0.3-0.41] mg/kg vs. 0.38 (0.33-0.44) mg/kg; P < 0.001). There were no differences in VTE (10.4% vs. 9.2%; P = 0.71) or pRBC administration (17.0% vs. 16.0%; P = 0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

TBW is higher and weight-adjusted enoxaparin dose is lower in high-risk trauma patients with subprophylactic anti-Xa concentrations. These data suggest TBW should be considered when determining the optimal prophylactic enoxaparin dose in high-risk trauma patients.

摘要

背景

血清抗因子 Xa(抗-Xa)浓度可指导创伤患者使用低分子肝素进行化学预防。较高的总体重(TBW)是亚预防抗-Xa 和静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的危险因素。本研究的目的是评估亚预防与预防性谷抗-Xa 相比患者的 TBW 差异。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了接受依诺肝素化学预防、谷抗-Xa 评估和筛查双能超声检查的成年创伤患者。初始依诺肝素剂量根据创伤团队体重分层方案确定,如果抗-Xa 为亚预防,则随后增加 10mg。患者分为亚预防(抗-Xa<0.1IU/ml)和预防(抗-Xa≥0.1IU/ml)组。主要结局是 TBW 的差异。次要结局是体重调整的依诺肝素剂量(mg/kg)、VTE、红细胞(pRBC)输血。

结果

共纳入 887 例患者,其中 681 例(76.8%)抗-Xa 为亚预防。亚预防组年龄较小,男性比例较高,损伤严重程度评分(ISS)较高,BMI 较高,住院时间较长。亚预防组 TBW 较高(中位数[IQR],87.8[74-102]kg 比 78.9[68-91.8]kg;P<0.001),相应的体重调整剂量较低(0.34[0.3-0.41]mg/kg 比 0.38[0.33-0.44]mg/kg;P<0.001)。VTE(10.4%比 9.2%;P=0.71)或 pRBC 给药(17.0%比 16.0%;P=0.81)无差异。

结论

TBW 较高,高危创伤患者亚预防抗-Xa 浓度时依诺肝素的体重调整剂量较低。这些数据表明,在确定高危创伤患者的最佳预防用依诺肝素剂量时应考虑 TBW。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验