Jeanson A L, Cooke S J, Danylchuk A J, Young N
Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario. K1S 5B6, Canada.
Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario. K1S 5B6, Canada.
J Environ Manage. 2021 Jul 1;289:112366. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112366. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
Pro-environmental behaviours (PEBs) are important for mitigation and restoration efforts in the Anthropocene. As recreationists are motivated to engage in leisure activities to increase their own personal wellbeing, we submit that threats to wellbeing (an egocentric motivator) predict engagement in PEBs amongst recreationists. We also predict that differences in experiences across groups of recreationists leads to differences in PEB engagement. Using an online survey, we test our two hypotheses (if recreationists perceive there is a threat to their wellbeing and that their behaviours can yield environmental successes, then they will be more likely to engage in PEBs, and if recreationists differ in recreational experiences then they will demonstrate differences in PEB engagement) amongst outdoor recreationists, specifically Canadian rainbow trout and steelhead anglers in British Columbia (n = 894 respondents). We define 'threat to wellbeing' as the interaction of environmental threat-perceptions of used environments for fishing, and level of centrality fishing has to one's lifestyle. To test our first hypothesis, we conducted three linear regressions corresponding to three different PEBs related to catch-and-release (C&R) fishing. Our egocentric predictor 'threat to wellbeing' was only significant for one out of the three PEBs tested, showing mixed support for our first hypothesis. It is of note that 'environmental threat perceptions' and one's belief in successes resulting from PEB engagement were found to be significant predictors for all three PEBs tested. These results suggest that predictors of PEB may not always be transferable across PEBs relating to recreational activities, and environmental threat perception and one's belief in successes resulting from PEB engagement are strong predictors of PEBs amongst recreationists. To test our second hypothesis, we conducted a Kruskal Wallis test to determine if there were significant differences across angler groups in PEB predictor scores and PEB engagement and conducted pairwise population Z-tests to determine proportional participation rates across angler groups for the three PEBs and PEB predictors investigated. Experiences were found to shape predictors of PEBs, as well as likelihood to engage in PEBs, as different angler groups targeting different fish (i.e., rainbow trout vs steelhead) and using different aquatic habitats (i.e., rivers vs. lakes) demonstrated significantly different scores for PEB predictors, as well as significantly different likelihood to engage in two of the three PEBs tested. These findings support the notion that recreationists are not a homogenous group, and that their beliefs and resulting behaviours during recreational activities are determined by their experiences in nature and can be influenced by the species with which they interact, and the habitats they use for recreation.
亲环境行为(PEBs)对于人类世的缓解和恢复努力至关重要。由于休闲者有动机参与休闲活动以提升自身的幸福感,我们认为对幸福感的威胁(一种以自我为中心的动机)能够预测休闲者参与亲环境行为的情况。我们还预测,不同休闲者群体的经历差异会导致亲环境行为参与度的不同。通过在线调查,我们在户外休闲者中,特别是不列颠哥伦比亚省的加拿大虹鳟和硬头鳟垂钓者(n = 894名受访者)中,检验了我们的两个假设(如果休闲者认为他们的幸福感受到威胁且其行为能够带来环境成效,那么他们将更有可能参与亲环境行为;如果休闲者的休闲经历不同,那么他们在亲环境行为参与度上会表现出差异)。我们将“对幸福感的威胁”定义为对钓鱼所用环境的环境威胁感知与钓鱼在个人生活方式中的核心程度之间的相互作用。为了检验我们的第一个假设,我们针对与钓后放流(C&R)钓鱼相关的三种不同亲环境行为进行了三次线性回归。我们以自我为中心的预测变量“对幸福感的威胁”在测试的三种亲环境行为中仅对其中一种显著,这表明我们的第一个假设得到了部分支持。值得注意的是,“环境威胁感知”以及个人对亲环境行为参与所带来成效的信念被发现是所有三种测试亲环境行为的显著预测因素。这些结果表明,亲环境行为的预测因素可能并非总是能在与休闲活动相关的亲环境行为之间通用,并且环境威胁感知以及个人对亲环境行为参与所带来成效的信念是休闲者中亲环境行为的有力预测因素。为了检验我们的第二个假设,我们进行了克鲁斯卡尔 - 沃利斯检验,以确定不同垂钓者群体在亲环境行为预测得分和亲环境行为参与度上是否存在显著差异,并进行了成对总体Z检验,以确定针对所调查的三种亲环境行为和亲环境行为预测因素,不同垂钓者群体的比例参与率。研究发现,经历会塑造亲环境行为的预测因素以及参与亲环境行为的可能性,因为不同的垂钓者群体以不同的鱼类(即虹鳟与硬头鳟)为目标,并使用不同的水生栖息地(即河流与湖泊),在亲环境行为预测因素上表现出显著不同的得分,并且在测试的三种亲环境行为中的两种行为上参与的可能性也显著不同。这些发现支持了这样一种观点,即休闲者不是一个同质化的群体,他们在休闲活动中的信念和由此产生的行为是由他们在自然中的经历所决定的,并且可能受到他们所互动的物种以及他们用于休闲的栖息地的影响。