Biomedicine Institute of Seville (IBIS), Medical Oncology Department, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, Sevilla, Spain.
Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Oncology. 2021;99 Suppl 1:8-16. doi: 10.1159/000515366. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
In the first-line setting of advanced soft tissue sarcomas (STS), the treatment aim generally drives decision-making. Anthracycline combinations with ifosfamide or dacarbazine are more appropriate when the aim is tumour shrinkage, and doxorubicin monotherapy is suitable for tumour control. In patients who progress on anthracycline-based regimens, scope exists for tumour shrinkage with trabectedin and concurrent low-dose radiotherapy. Selecting systemic treatment for patients with advanced STS unsuited to receive standard anthracycline-based therapy often involves complex decision-making as clinical trial evidence comparing alternative options is lacking. Key factors to consider are patient characteristics (e.g., age, medical history, performance status), disease characteristics (e.g., stage, histology), and treatment requirements such as the drug's safety profile, evidence of efficacy by subtype, and approved indication as an alternative first-line treatment option. Real-world data for elderly STS patients derived from retrospective studies and post hoc analyses of clinical trials have particular value in guiding treatment selection and improving the management of this populous but undertreated segment of the STS population.
在高级软组织肉瘤 (STS) 的一线治疗中,治疗目的通常是决策的驱动因素。当治疗目的是肿瘤缩小时,阿霉素联合异环磷酰胺或达卡巴嗪更为合适,而阿霉素单药治疗适用于肿瘤控制。对于接受基于蒽环类药物的方案治疗后进展的患者,使用曲贝替定联合低剂量放疗仍有肿瘤缩小的可能。对于不适合接受标准蒽环类药物治疗的晚期 STS 患者,选择系统治疗通常需要进行复杂的决策,因为缺乏比较替代方案的临床试验证据。需要考虑的关键因素包括患者特征(如年龄、病史、体能状态)、疾病特征(如分期、组织学)以及治疗要求,如药物的安全性特征、亚型疗效证据以及作为替代一线治疗选择的批准适应证。来自回顾性研究和临床试验事后分析的老年 STS 患者的真实世界数据在指导治疗选择和改善这一人群数量众多但治疗不足的 STS 人群的管理方面具有特别重要的价值。