Nees Lisa Katharina, Grozinger Philipp, Orthmann Natalie, Deutsch Thomas Maximilian, Hennigs André, Domschke Christoph, Wallwiener Markus, Rom Joachim, Riedel Fabian
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Asklepios Klinik Hamburg-Altona, Department of Gynecology and Obstetric, Hamburg, Germany.
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Apr 13;21(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02627-6.
The influence of music on the performance of surgical procedures such as laparoscopy is controversial and methodologically difficult to quantify. Here, outcome measurements using laparoscopic box training tools under standardized conditions might offer a feasible approach. To date, the effect of music exposure at different sound pressure levels (SPL) on outcome has not been evaluated systematically for laparoscopic novices.
Between May 2017 and October 2018, n = 87 students (49 males, 38 females) from Heidelberg University Medical School performed three different laparoscopy exercises using the "Luebecker Toolbox" that were repeated twice under standardized conditions. Time was recorded for each run. All students were randomly assigned to four groups exposed to the same music compilation but at different SPLs (50-80 dB), an acoustically shielded (earplug) group, or a control group (no intervention).
Best absolute performance was shown under exposure to 70 dB in all three exercises (a, b, c) with mean performance time of 121, 142, and 115 s (p < 0.05 for a and c). For the control group mean performance times were 157, 144, and 150 s, respectively. In the earplug group, no significant difference in performance was found compared to the control group (p > 0.05) except for exercise (a) (p = 0.011).
Music exposure seems to have beneficial effects on training performance. In comparison to the control group, significantly better results were reached at 70 dB SPL, while exposure to lower (50 or 60 dB) or higher (80 dB) SPL as well as under acoustic shielding did not influence performance.
音乐对外科手术(如腹腔镜手术)操作的影响存在争议,且在方法上难以量化。在此,在标准化条件下使用腹腔镜箱式训练工具进行结果测量可能提供一种可行的方法。迄今为止,尚未对腹腔镜新手在不同声压水平(SPL)下接触音乐对结果的影响进行系统评估。
2017年5月至2018年10月期间,来自海德堡大学医学院的n = 87名学生(49名男性,38名女性)使用“吕贝克工具箱”进行了三种不同的腹腔镜练习,并在标准化条件下重复两次。记录每次运行的时间。所有学生被随机分为四组,接触相同的音乐合辑,但声压水平不同(50 - 80分贝),一个隔音(耳塞)组,或一个对照组(无干预)。
在所有三项练习(a、b、c)中,接触70分贝时表现出最佳绝对成绩,平均成绩时间分别为121秒、142秒和115秒(a和c的p < 0.05)。对照组的平均成绩时间分别为157秒、144秒和150秒。在耳塞组中,除练习(a)外(p = 0.011),与对照组相比,表现无显著差异(p > 0.05)。
接触音乐似乎对训练表现有有益影响。与对照组相比,在70分贝声压水平下取得了显著更好的结果,而接触较低(50或60分贝)或较高(80分贝)声压水平以及在隔音条件下并未影响表现。