• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
An evaluation of the implementation of quality improvement (QI) in primary care dentistry: a multi-method approach.评价初级保健牙科中质量改进 (QI) 的实施情况:一种多方法的方法。
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Apr;10(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000839.
2
Implementation of quality improvement skills by primary care teams: case study of a large academic practice.基层医疗团队质量改进技能的实施:大型学术实践案例研究
J Prim Care Community Health. 2014 Apr 1;5(2):101-6. doi: 10.1177/2150131913520601. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
3
Successful implementation of a combined learning collaborative and mentoring intervention to improve neonatal quality of care in rural Rwanda.成功实施联合学习协作和指导干预措施,以提高卢旺达农村地区新生儿护理质量。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 4;18(1):941. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3752-z.
4
Factors associated with the impact of quality improvement collaboratives in mental healthcare: an exploratory study.与精神卫生保健中质量改进合作的影响相关的因素:一项探索性研究。
Implement Sci. 2012 Jan 9;7:1. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-1.
5
Nine states' use of collaboratives to improve children's health care quality in medicaid and CHIP.九个州利用合作组织提高医疗补助计划和儿童健康保险计划中儿童医疗保健质量的情况。
Acad Pediatr. 2013 Nov-Dec;13(6 Suppl):S95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.04.008.
6
Factors influencing measurement for improvement skills in healthcare staff: trainee, and trainer perspectives.影响医疗保健人员改进技能测量的因素:受训者和培训师的观点。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Apr 2;22(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03282-1.
7
Assessing fidelity to evidence-based quality improvement as an implementation strategy for patient-centered medical home transformation in the Veterans Health Administration.评估基于证据的质量改进的保真度,作为退伍军人健康管理局患者为中心的医疗之家转型的实施策略。
Implement Sci. 2020 Mar 18;15(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-0979-y.
8
Exploring the sustainability of quality improvement interventions in healthcare organisations: a multiple methods study of the 10-year impact of the 'Productive Ward: Releasing Time to Care' programme in English acute hospitals.探索医疗保健组织中质量改进干预措施的可持续性:一项为期 10 年的“生产病房:释放时间护理”计划在英国急性医院的影响的多方法研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Jan;29(1):31-40. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009457. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
9
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
10
Effects of facilitated team meetings and learning collaboratives on colorectal cancer screening rates in primary care practices: a cluster randomized trial.促进团队会议和学习协作对初级保健实践中结直肠癌筛查率的影响:一项群组随机试验。
Ann Fam Med. 2013 May-Jun;11(3):220-8, S1-8. doi: 10.1370/afm.1505.

本文引用的文献

1
Qualitative evaluation of the Safety and Improvement in Primary Care (SIPC) pilot collaborative in Scotland: perceptions and experiences of participating care teams.苏格兰基层医疗安全与改善(SIPC)试点合作项目的定性评估:参与护理团队的看法与经验
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 29;6(1):e009526. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009526.
2
Promotion of improvement as a science.将改进提升为一门科学。
Lancet. 2013 Feb 2;381(9864):419-21. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61850-9.
3
Determinants of success of quality improvement collaboratives: what does the literature show?质量改进合作的成功因素:文献有何显示?
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Jan;22(1):19-31. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000651. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
4
Theories of behaviour change synthesised into a set of theoretical groupings: introducing a thematic series on the theoretical domains framework.行为改变理论综合为一组理论分类:引入关于理论领域框架的主题系列。
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:35. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-35.
5
Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research.理论领域框架在行为改变和实施研究中的验证。
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:37. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-37.
6
Temporal trends in rates of patient harm resulting from medical care.医疗导致的患者伤害发生率的时间趋势。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Nov 25;363(22):2124-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1004404.
7
The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review.住院不良事件的发生率及性质:一项系统综述
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Jun;17(3):216-23. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.023622.
8
Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach.使心理学理论有助于实施循证实践:一种共识方法。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Feb;14(1):26-33. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.011155.
9
Quality collaboratives: lessons from research.质量协作:研究经验教训
Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Dec;11(4):345-51. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.4.345.
10
Quality improvement research: understanding the science of change in health care.质量改进研究:理解医疗保健中的变革科学。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Jun;11(2):110-1. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.2.110.

评价初级保健牙科中质量改进 (QI) 的实施情况:一种多方法的方法。

An evaluation of the implementation of quality improvement (QI) in primary care dentistry: a multi-method approach.

机构信息

School of Dentistry, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK

Clinical Effectiveness Workstream, NHS Education for Scotland, Dundee, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Apr;10(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000839.

DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000839
PMID:33849904
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8051365/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Ensuring that healthcare is patient-centred, safe and harm free is the cornerstone of the NHS. The Scottish Patient Safety Programme (SPSP) is a national initiative to support the provision of safe, high-quality care. SPSP promotes a coordinated approach to quality improvement (QI) in primary care by providing evidence-based methods, such as the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Breakthrough Series Collaborative methodology. These methods are relatively untested within dentistry. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact to inform the development and implementation of improvement collaboratives as a means for QI in primary care dentistry.

DESIGN

A multimethod study underpinned by the Theoretical Domains Framework and the Kirkpatrick model. Quantitative data were collected using baseline and follow-up questionnaires, designed to explore beliefs and behaviours towards improving quality in practice. Qualitative data were gathered using interviews with dental team members and practice-based case studies.

RESULTS

One hundred and eleven dental team members completed the baseline questionnaire. Follow-up questionnaires were returned by 79 team members. Twelve practices, including two case studies, participated in evaluation interviews. Findings identified positive beliefs and increased knowledge and skills towards QI, as well as increased confidence about using QI methodologies in practice. Barriers included time, poor patient and team engagement, communication and leadership. Facilitators included team working, clear roles, strong leadership, training, peer support and visible benefits. Participants' knowledge and skills were identified as an area for improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings demonstrate increased knowledge, skills and confidence in relation to QI methodology and highlight areas for improvement. This is an example of partnership working between the Scottish Government and NHSScotland towards a shared ambition to provide safe care to every patient. More work is required to evaluate the sustainability and transferability of improvement collaboratives as a means for QI in dentistry and wider primary care.

摘要

目的

确保医疗保健以患者为中心、安全且无伤害是国民保健制度的基石。苏格兰患者安全计划(SPSP)是一项支持提供安全、高质量护理的国家倡议。SPSP 通过提供循证方法(如医疗改进研究所的突破系列合作方法),促进初级保健中协调一致的质量改进(QI)方法。这些方法在牙科领域相对未经测试。本研究的目的是评估影响,为在初级保健牙科中作为 QI 手段的改进合作的开发和实施提供信息。

设计

一项基于理论领域框架和柯克帕特里克模型的多方法研究。使用基线和随访问卷收集定量数据,旨在探索改善实践质量的信念和行为。使用牙科团队成员的访谈和基于实践的案例研究收集定性数据。

结果

111 名牙科团队成员完成了基线问卷。79 名团队成员回复了随访问卷。12 家实践,包括 2 个案例研究,参与了评估访谈。调查结果确定了积极的信念以及对 QI 的知识和技能的提高,以及对在实践中使用 QI 方法的信心增强。障碍包括时间、患者和团队参与度差、沟通和领导力不足。促进因素包括团队合作、明确的角色、强大的领导力、培训、同行支持和明显的利益。参与者的知识和技能被确定为一个需要改进的领域。

结论

研究结果表明,参与者在 QI 方法方面的知识、技能和信心有所提高,并强调了需要改进的领域。这是苏格兰政府和 NHSScotland 之间合作的一个例子,旨在实现为每位患者提供安全护理的共同目标。需要进一步的工作来评估作为牙科和更广泛的初级保健中 QI 手段的改进合作的可持续性和可转移性。